Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Sziget 2023


#1SzigetFan

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, billybigballs said:

Iron Maiden in 2010. Korn (are they metal?) a couple of years later.

Nothing for a decade, basically. Not going to happen.

yep, sadly... 😕 In 2019 we had "Of Mice & Men" at the  A38, in 2022 "cleopatrick" at the Europe stage (not really metal, but it was good though ^^) .. I would love sziget to offer us at least 1 metal act per day, even on a small stage.. ! damn they have changed so much.. 😞

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/15/2022 at 6:19 AM, #1SzigetFan said:

The only metal band I can see headlining Sziget one day is Metallica.

Agreed. Maybe Rage too. it has to be someone that week ticket people will want to say they have seen like Foos in 2019

Edited by gfa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Nikky said:

Katy Parry is going on world tour next year. 

interesting, where did you see that ?

4 hours ago, thetime said:

foo fighters are hardly metal or even hard rock. 

agreed ; this is pure Rock. And it fits Sziget perfectly, a very nice souvenir from the 2019 edition 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Matt86 said:

FdEhKriWAAEM2GG.thumb.jpg.17c7db68293016872fbf5b9268227da0.jpg.7a47a081a4d5f1abc2dd3897e3be8c4b.jpg

 

If it's true : That's beautiful ^^ My dream of seing Blink-182 back at Sziget is reborn lol..

The first two headliners I saw in my life, at Sziget 2014, were Blink-182 followed by Deadmau5. I will always appreciate Blink because they set the bar so low that a pretty good show by Deadmau5 became a massive life-changing experience in comparison. As of today, they were the worst headliner I witnessed on the main stage, after Rihanna and David Guetta.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, who would you all like to see headline next year. Not necessarily who you think will, just who you'd like. Top three.

My eclectic mix:

- The Killers - not the greatest band but have a great back catalogue of bangers.

- Miley Cyrus - I'm not the right demographic to be a Miley fan, but love her voice and think she'd put on a great show

- Eminem - probably the only act that would guarantee my attendance in 2023.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, swelsbyuk said:

So, who would you all like to see headline next year. Not necessarily who you think will, just who you'd like. Top three.

My eclectic mix:

- The Killers - not the greatest band but have a great back catalogue of bangers.

- Miley Cyrus - I'm not the right demographic to be a Miley fan, but love her voice and think she'd put on a great show

- Eminem - probably the only act that would guarantee my attendance in 2023.

I would give a kind of "identity" to Sziget in their headliners choices, every year. And my 2023 babys would be :

* Rock act 1 : My Chemical Romance or Panic! at the Disco

* Classic / Legend act : R.E.M or No Doubt

* Female act : Katy Perry or P!nk

* EDM act : Armin Van Buuren or Martin Garrix

* Pop act : Imagine Dragons or Coldplay

* Rap / HipHop act : Eminem or Outkast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Went in 2019 and loved it, have tickets to next year already and hoping for a similarly balanced line up!

Top for me would be something like:

Pop Act - Coldplay

Rock Act - Green Day

EDM Act - Kygo

Rap Act - Stormzy

Classic Act - Elton John

Female Act - Pink

At least that’s my close to ideal! Would love to be surprised by some that I don’t know though!

 

 

Edited by Gloch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...