Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

 

50 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

I agree. There was no ban on summer holidays last year so it is hard to see why it would be needed more when the vaccination programme is so far under way.

I'm hoping to go away in October and fully prepared for it not to happen. But would be amazed if people didn't get to go to Europe in July/August. Would be a real shift from this government.

My biggest concern is that the "trade off" will see events restricted or banned to allow for the trips abroad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, JoeyT said:

In my local park earlier (which was absolutely rammed) there was a group of roughly 12 adults & children of mixed ages all together sat/ stood around a large bench. Clearly a birthday or celebration of some type with food etc laid out.

I know many people will say “not happening where I live” or “I only see couples walking together” but that really isn’t the case where I live.

Many people meeting outside and not just in a bumping in to each other kind of way.

FWIW we are at 19 cases per 100k.

I genuinely think (in an outside environment at least) people are now seeing the logic of minimal risk + low cases in the area mean they can do what they wish within reason.

Yeah, although I'm broadly in favour of the unlocking plan and the timescales, the restrictions on informal outdoors meeting can get in the sea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

 

My biggest concern is that the "trade off" will see events restricted or banned to allow for the trips abroad

by the summer hopefully third wave will be over in europe and cases will be much lower there too...and their vaccination programme will be going much better. Too early to say whether can travel there or not, I expect we will be able to with proof of vaccine or recent test or something.

Edited by steviewevie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

by the summer hopefully third wave will be over in europe and cases will be much lower there too...and there vaccination programme will be going much better. Too early to say whether can travel there or not, I expect we will be able to with proof of vaccine or recent test or something.

The EU green vaccination passport which will be introduced in June would be rather senseless if you can not travel in summer. The EU have made a lot of senseless things but I expect this to be working (also including the UK, maybe excluding some other places like France but who knows).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Yeah, although I'm broadly in favour of the unlocking plan and the timescales, the restrictions on informal outdoors meeting can get in the sea.

This and outdoors hospitality really are the things which I think should be earlier than they are currently scheduled.

It probably comes across as if I’m some kind of anti-lockdown nutter but all of my posts in regards to the roadmap have been towards outside stuff rather than inside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Barry Fish said:

USA is planning on reopening from Mid May to the UK.  

Again, ‘planning’ and if it does happen that doesn’t mean there will be much in the way of flights. And Vaccine Passports will probably be required if there is any. And they’re doing quite well with their Vaccine program.

Obviously things might change but I work in Aviation, there’s not much expectation of significant traffic in mid-May. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MEGABOWL said:

Again, ‘planning’ and if it does happen that doesn’t mean there will be much in the way of flights. And Vaccine Passports will probably be required if there is any. And they’re doing quite well with their Vaccine program.

Obviously things might change but I work in Aviation, there’s not much expectation of significant traffic in mid-May. 

How about late July?...my brother and family want to come to UK from US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, MEGABOWL said:

Again, ‘planning’ and if it does happen that doesn’t mean there will be much in the way of flights. And Vaccine Passports will probably be required if there is any. And they’re doing quite well with their Vaccine program.

Obviously things might change but I work in Aviation, there’s not much expectation of significant traffic in mid-May. 

Mate it’s simple fly into a hub airport such as Atlanta, New York or LAX and then get a domestic flight to your vacation city. Those flights have been running throughout the pandemic and will be busy come summer. As an American I am very much missing my home country

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, StuMalinas said:

Mate it’s simple fly into a hub airport such as Atlanta, New York or LAX and then get a domestic flight to your vacation city. Those flights have been running throughout the pandemic and will be busy come summer. As an American I am very much missing my home country

Getting past my original point now. All I said was ‘There’s bound to be a bit of panic in some quarters about holidays with parts of Europe struggling but by the time they’re likely to be allowed (July) things in Europe will be a lot better and there should be some kind of Vaccine/Test passport system in place. That should mitigate the (very low) risk of a Vaccine-dodging variant.’

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, efcfanwirral said:

 

My biggest concern is that the "trade off" will see events restricted or banned to allow for the trips abroad

I actually don't think so, but we don't have a precedent for big live events yet (apart from the distanced gigs etc that went on). And we have an absolute precedent for foreign holidays, which plenty of people I work with went on last summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, gooner1990 said:

Personally, I would opt for the pay rise and keep working 5 days a week. 

You just know some employers will start attempting to push five days worth of work out of people in four if they took that option.

Presumably they did the maths and realised that a 4 day week on their current salary would mean they're actually getting paid more per day/hour than they would on a 5 day week with a 20% rise.

And that'd be exacerbated even more when you consider that the way taxes are structured means that a 20% rise will result in significantly less than 20% extra take home pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...