Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, xxialac said:

That's a very good counter-argument.

That said, having no targets means the government can do whatever it wants with no accounatability.

I also see Johnson has said he is "VERY CONFIDENT" all restrictions will end on June 21.

This seems reckless to me, given the unknowns ahead.

Agreed on the target thing, although it does seem to be a bit of a rock and a hard place.

The very confident thing is similar. I think there needs to be an air of confidence that what he's doing is going ot work, otherwise it's even harder to justify the road map. We as the public need to see confidence in it, otherwis why would we trust it and go along with it? The whole minimum 5 week thing has given me a slightly higher level of confidence that he's not doing the "here to save Christmas" bollocks again.

He also, surprisingly for me, slapped down the dickhead from the  Heil last night who was twattering on about buccaneering Boris, so maybe some lessons have finally wormed their through his skull.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, fraybentos1 said:

What else could it possibly be, if not supply issues?

Not sure if it was ever officially confirmed or not but there's been suggestions that they've started holding back a certain number of doses so they can be sure of covering the second doses, which start coming due fairly soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, fraybentos1 said:

So if you had bad hayfever you wouldn't take an anti hystamine?

A bad headache you wouldn't take a painkiller?

Why would you do that to yourself?

If the hayfever's bad and really impairing my day then yes.  If it's just an irritant then no.

Ditto headache. If it's crippling me to the point that I'm struggling to function then yes. If it's unpleasant then no.

It's served me well enough over the years.  I don't like medication to be my default go to option as soon as something's wrong, and rightly or wrongly I trust my body and immune system to do its job and heal me unless it needs some additional support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, incident said:

Not sure if it was ever officially confirmed or not but there's been suggestions that they've started holding back a certain number of doses so they can be sure of covering the second doses, which start coming due fairly soon.

That kinda is supply issues even if it is that imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Quark said:

If the hayfever's bad and really impairing my day then yes.  If it's just an irritant then no.

Ditto headache. If it's crippling me to the point that I'm struggling to function then yes. If it's unpleasant then no.

It's served me well enough over the years.  I don't like medication to be my default go to option as soon as something's wrong, and rightly or wrongly I trust my body and immune system to do its job and heal me unless it needs some additional support.

Do you also only take caffeine and alcohol when absolutely necessary too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has it been confirmed yet what the plans are for the vaccine rollout for those under 50’s that fall outside the 1-9 priority groups?

Are they going to continue working their way through the age brackets and offering appointments, or if supplies allow, are they going to operate a ‘turn up’ and queue policy at the vaccination centres?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

That's very liberal use of 'lot of people'. Who on earth are these people you speak of.

OK I'll change it to "quite a few" doesn't really matter, the point is there are some who don't like to take medication, I was one, for many years I dIdn't bother with paracetamol etc when i had a cold, you know it's going away in a few days anyway, as I've got older I'm more inclined to take stuff, maybe I'm just getting soft!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DeanoL said:

Do you also only take caffeine and alcohol when absolutely necessary too?

No, I choose to enjoy those as I see fit because they're inherent parts of things I find enjoyable in life.  The others not so much.

I mean, I'm giving you an actual answer but I think we both know the question's pretty unnecessary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, zahidf said:

That tweet says 3.59 after the parliamentary announcement. 

 

Govt announcement c.3pm

Bristol Sounds announcement 6.51pm

Therefore in that 3 or 4 hour period, Bristol Sounds could verbally tell the Bristol Post reporter they're giving up on going ahead end of June.

We're talking a simple 5 minute call with a journalist, it's not complicated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Quark said:

No, I choose to enjoy those as I see fit because they're inherent parts of things I find enjoyable in life.  The others not so much.

I mean, I'm giving you an actual answer but I think we both know the question's pretty unnecessary. 

They make you feel better. Same reason you'd take any drug. 

It wasn't an unnecessary question, I know plenty of people who avoid meds as much as possible, don't drink or take caffeine or alcohol.

You can obviously draw your dividing line wherever you want and different things work for different people but there's no fundamental difference - drugs is drugs is drugs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Quark said:

If the hayfever's bad and really impairing my day then yes.  If it's just an irritant then no.

Ditto headache. If it's crippling me to the point that I'm struggling to function then yes. If it's unpleasant then no.

It's served me well enough over the years.  I don't like medication to be my default go to option as soon as something's wrong, and rightly or wrongly I trust my body and immune system to do its job and heal me unless it needs some additional support.

I preemptively take pain killers if I think I'm going to get a headache.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...