Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Exactly. If our government has acted when SAGE advised, had acted faster (in both waves) and harder in November then things would be much better when we went into the Christmas relaxation. As a result the numbers were too high as we are seeing now which is even before Christmas gets taken into account in the data.

The government have made mistake after mistake and refuse to learn. Everything we are seeing now is on them. 

They look purely at the science - they don't have to balance anything else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Copperface said:

Sacha Lord interviewed on 5 Live this morning, talking about tonight's streaming Hacienda NYE party, Parklife in September next year, and festival/live entertainment prospects in general for 2021. 

Starts at 2:40:09 in...specifically asked about festivals at 2:44:05

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m000qms2

Thanks for sharing that - sounds ominous for early summer, but positive from August onwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

They look purely at the science - they don't have to balance anything else. 

By acting too late the government harmed both public health and the economy. Whilst SAGE do look at the science, their advice can be helpful in the wider context too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No wonder the hospitals are full - a distant family member (who is 80) has been discharged today after just over 8 weeks in hospital.
They have done an amazing job in saving her life and the team all were incredible with the levels of care. This is what the NHS and it’s outstanding staff is all about. 

Just got me thinking though, 8 weeks is such a long time to keep a bed occupied, and this is just for one person in an ever busy hospital. And this scenario is very common. Pretty sure she wouldn’t have made it back in the Spring too. 
Can’t help thinking the Nightingale hospitals could have been used for those recovering weeks later after the initial worst of the symptoms and initial threat to life are over. I know there are the staffing issues, but she was receiving routine/non-specialist care for 4/5 weeks before she was let home. Not bring ungrateful at all and can’t thank the amazing staff enough, but not sure how long this can continue across the country in the coming months. 

Edited by st dan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

 

59EE8479-78E7-4681-A197-7A7C95C1D0B7.png

I knew he was a prick but this is on another level.

So if I understand right, Ross Clark, freelance journalist, knows better than not just SAGE and the UK government but governments in every corner of the world? 

Edited by xxialac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

By acting too late the government harmed both public health and the economy. Whilst SAGE do look at the science, their advice can be helpful in the wider context too. 

Its not being ignored, it's part of the decision making process. Its not the decision making process. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vandalise any Wetherspoons you see with that dangerous shit in the windows. Some ‘SAVE THE NHS’ graffiti over the windows or something nice*. 
 

* Tier permitting whether you should be out of your home. 

Edited by Andre91
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Andre91 said:

Vandalise any Wetherspoons you see with that dangerous shit in the windows. Some ‘SAVE THE NHS’ graffiti over the windows or something nice. 

That was the kind of thing I was thinking ....although I might go for a softer option ... like a poster over the top of theirs ... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

Its not being ignored, it's part of the decision making process. Its not the decision making process. 

Who said it’s being ignored? I’ve said they acted too slowly and then didn’t act hard enough as a result. of the government has followed the advice when it was advised to them then things wouldn’t have been as bad. As a result we have some of the highest death figures in the world and one of the heaviest recessions. We have the worst of both worlds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

R

59EE8479-78E7-4681-A197-7A7C95C1D0B7.png


On a positive note, I’ve just strolled past the vaccination centre at Kings by London Bridge and the queue was round the block. 
 

I’ve been struggling the last few days, but that was quite incredible to see and much needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

 

Problem with this is the same reason it actually would have been worse under Labour - the country is pro "freedom" so any attempts to lock down before there is overwhelming evidence that you definitely need to is going into the realms of authoritarian. For the Tories and their supporters, who make up the majority of this country, there needs to be numbers to support it 

If it'd been Labour trying to lock down in anticipation of something happening then compliance would've been too low and it could've been seen by many as the communists enacting the plan of control that they wanted to do anyway. This country was always a lost cause for stopping this virus because of the public. 

The stupidity and selfishness of many of the people in this country is why we are where we are. The majority don't believe in government control or being told what to do in any way, so no government could've stopped this without hugely authoritarian measures. The deaths and cases was inevitable here - lockdown too early and nobody complies and lock down hard too often and you'd probably end up with civil unrest and less restrictions overall. And those are the only options - we won't even accept proper quarantine of travellers so I dont know what chance we have in every day life 

And yet all the polling that I've seen has said that the majority of people are in favour of lockdowns; a majority supported a 2 week circuit breaker in October, a majority supported a lockdown over Christmas and in November You Gov published this

https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/8vylxqh84u/England lockdown snap poll.pdf

I can't find anything published since the new variant came to light which I suspect would increase lockdown support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, st dan said:

No wonder the hospitals are full - a distant family member (who is 80) has been discharged today after just over 8 weeks in hospital.
They have done an amazing job in saving her life and the team all were incredible with the levels of care. This is what the NHS and it’s outstanding staff is all about. 

Just got me thinking though, 8 weeks is such a long time to keep a bed occupied, and this is just for one person in an ever busy hospital. And this scenario is very common. Pretty sure she wouldn’t have made it back in the Spring too. 
Can’t help thinking the Nightingale hospitals could have been used for those recovering weeks later after the initial worst of the symptoms and initial threat to life are over. I know there are the staffing issues, but she was receiving routine/non-specialist care for 4/5 weeks before she was let home. 

 

11 minutes ago, st dan said:

No wonder the hospitals are full - a distant family member (who is 80) has been discharged today after just over 8 weeks in hospital.
They have done an amazing job in saving her life and the team all were incredible with the levels of care. This is what the NHS and it’s outstanding staff is all about. 

Just got me thinking though, 8 weeks is such a long time to keep a bed occupied, and this is just for one person in an ever busy hospital. And this scenario is very common. Pretty sure she wouldn’t have made it back in the Spring too. 
Can’t help thinking the Nightingale hospitals could have been used for those recovering weeks later after the initial worst of the symptoms and initial threat to life are over. I know there are the staffing issues, but she was receiving routine/non-specialist care for 4/5 weeks before she was let home. 

I was talking to my mum, a former hospital social worker about an article saying that hospitals were at 80% capacity or whatever the figure was. Her comments were so far that's a good year then as normally hospitals are manic now and people don't realise how bad it is every year. 

Obviously the pressures are different this year and the average stay seems to have gone up as treatment has improved.

Have the hospitals in the hardest hit areas stopped routine / non essential treatment at the moment? Granted this is awful for anyone affected by a cancellation but when you have limited resources difficult choices need to be made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mike46 said:


On a positive note, I’ve just strolled past the vaccination centre at Kings by London Bridge and the queue was round the block. 
 

I’ve been struggling the last few days, but that was quite incredible to see and much needed.

Hope it wasn’t 3 people with a bad sense of how big the social distance gaps need to be 🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mike46 said:


On a positive note, I’ve just strolled past the vaccination centre at Kings by London Bridge and the queue was round the block. 
 

I’ve been struggling the last few days, but that was quite incredible to see and much needed.

Hang around! Might be able to get any last minute available slots...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...