Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, FestivalJamie said:

Hi I work in a theme park (not LEGOLAND though) and they weren’t shut under tier 3.

I was thinking initially that we wouldn’t reopen in December but after last night’s leak I’m pretty confident we will be given only “wet pubs” and bookies seem to be affected by the strictest measures.

That being said though, I hope we toughen up our covid rules. Before we shut for lockdown it was chaos and most people were not respecting rule of 6 or social distancing, so we need to toughen up on those, and just something to be mindful of if you do go to Legoland this Christmas! :)


 

This one I find really weird. Bookies were getting shut left, right and centre under tier 3 rules before the lockdown. Is there some evidence that shows betting shops are responsible for outbreaks? I guess you want to shut down anywhere that encourages gatherings of older people (are bingo halls also closed?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

Yeah maybe. As I say it's public transport that worries me really and any test would be done before travel so it wouldn't really solve that bit. If we can avoid trains etc then quite a lot of the worry would be gone for me as we don't really get exposed to many people in our day to day.

I'm not big on Christmas and would happily spend it at home, just the two of us. It's more just trying to please everyone else really. Some conversations to be had! 

Would your family go with a postponement till the weather improves and you can be outside/medications are around?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, FestivalJamie said:

Hi I work in a theme park (not LEGOLAND though) and they weren’t shut under tier 3.

I was thinking initially that we wouldn’t reopen in December but after last night’s leak I’m pretty confident we will be given only “wet pubs” and bookies seem to be affected by the strictest measures.

That being said though, I hope we toughen up our covid rules. Before we shut for lockdown it was chaos and most people were not respecting rule of 6 or social distancing, so we need to toughen up on those, and just something to be mindful of if you do go to Legoland this Christmas! :)

I'm pretty shocked they were open under tier 3. I agree that whatever the toughened up "top tier" is, it's unlikely to allow Legoland to open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

If the tiers are being toughened up (which they probably should) then I don't think my life is going to feel much different from December 2nd. If the gym reopens I'll go back but other than that I think we'll stay pretty locked down. And I can definitely see the argument for keeping that closed too (I've managed to exercise pretty successfully at home during both lockdowns, but mainly because I do classes which are fairly easy to do from home). 

Really don't know what to do for the best re Christmas though. Main issue for us is public transport as I think hire cars will be even more expensive than they were back in summer. If the trains are normal levels of busy I don't know how great I feel about getting one to either of our sets of parents :(

Also a week is a pretty short time to get to see everyone in. If we get trains to and from one set and then either back home or straight to the other we will be coming into contact with more people than we have for the past two months or more in the space of a few days.

Don't know what the answer is really. Will see what Johnson says tomorrow and then try to come to some kind of decision about it all.

I think deep down I feel like it's quite a lot of risk to take when the vaccine is so close. If it wasn't for the public transport issue I think I'd feel happier about it.

Just my thoughts: not judging anyone else as I know these choices are tough and personal to all. 

I would either take the car route and have the windows open (wear coats!) or take a small foldup chair and sit next to an open window in between carriages. There's also talk of opening windows more generally on the trains which would help significantly and it would be reckless if they don't take this simple measure.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, xxialac said:

I would either take the car route and have the windows open (wear coats!) or take a small foldup chair and sit next to an open window in between carriages. There's also talk of opening windows more generally on the trains which would help significantly and it would be reckless if they don't take this simple measure.

 

That’s just nicer in general, I find trains can get so stuffy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ozanne said:

That’s just nicer in general, I find trains can get so stuffy. 

It would be so simple for the operators to write an email to their customers letting them know why they are bringing this in new measure and to wrap up to prepare for it. And would be just for that week.

I bet they don't...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, xxialac said:

It would be so simple for the operators to write an email to their customers letting them know why they are bringing this in new measure and to wrap up to prepare for it. And would be just for that week.

I bet they don't...

Pretty much sums up the past few months in general, people in leadership permission not even trying to reach out to the public to get them on board then left with an even tougher task. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Pretty much sums up the past few months in general, people in leadership permission not even trying to reach out to the public to get them on board then left with an even tougher task. 

Yeah, the messaging on this will be chaotic, confused and last minute.

Ironic that Johnson was sold to the public as a great communicator and he has presided over chronically bad communication on his watch. The Cabinet don't even know the rules - how can the public?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Would your family go with a postponement till the weather improves and you can be outside/medications are around?

They probably would, yeah. Hence why I'm so torn really. Seems mean to not see them for a fairly minimal risk and there will be added pressure as everyone else will be doing it, in their eyes at least. Throughout the pandemic me and my partner have been far more wary than all of our parents so it makes it a bit tricky to always be the bad guys saying no to stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

They probably would, yeah. Hence why I'm so torn really. Seems mean to not see them for a fairly minimal risk and there will be added pressure as everyone else will be doing it, in their eyes at least. Throughout the pandemic me and my partner have been far more wary than all of our parents so it makes it a bit tricky to always be the bad guys saying no to stuff.

Your parents were 'always the bad guys' in your childhood setting boundaries that were in your best long term interests.

The tables have simply turned!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, xxialac said:

I would either take the car route and have the windows open (wear coats!) or take a small foldup chair and sit next to an open window in between carriages. There's also talk of opening windows more generally on the trains which would help significantly and it would be reckless if they don't take this simple measure.

 

Yeah issue with hire car is cost really. We spent over £200 for a weekend visit back in July. God knows what it would be over Christmas! Will look into it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, eFestivals said:

Why do you think specifically the Jews are not permitted the same as other peoples?

Having told you repeatedly that I don't question Israel's right to exist, there's nothing more I can add.

3 hours ago, eFestivals said:

what's irrational about the idea of 'a people' having a place to collectively call home?

You've changed my words.  I specifically called Zionism irrational.  I’ve already explained why I think that, in terms of magic iron age books, but I’ll try to put it another way: “Sorry chaps, we’ve decided that it’s time that the worldwide disaspora of Celts and Druids finally get reparation for the Romans kicking them out so we’re re-homing them in the South West of England.  Let us know if you need any help with packing.”  You’re now going to pull me up for being facetious, but the true story is even more batshit-crazy than that:

If there ever was a historical Jesus, he was just a revolutionary Jew who was executed for opposing the Roman occupation.  After his death, his following evolved from radical anti-Roman ideology to a religion.  200 years later, in order to make this new religion palatable to the Romans, a bullshit story was added to the texts whereby the Romans didn’t want to execute God, but the Jews demanded it - even choosing to release a mass murderer rather than Jesus.  (In case anyone didn’t get the message, they even had these fictitious, comedy Jews wailing ‘this stain will be upon us for the rest of history.’)  This worked - Rome became Christian, and the Jews were now set up for exiles, pogroms, ghettos, Spanish Inquisition and the Holocaust. Throughout these 1700 years of brutality, Islamic countries were the most reliable refuges for the Jews, as they don’t accept the New Testament so don’t have that scriptural justification for antisemitism.

So… Muslims: generally okay with the Jews; Christians: not so much.  Then how did we end up with Christian countries paving the path to the creation of Israel with the Balfour declaration?  Turns out Balfour and Lloyd George were Christian fundamentalists, who believed the Jews returning to Jerusalem was a necessary first step before Armageddon and the second coming of Christ.  Prior to the fundamentalist Christians getting involved, ‘Zionism’ was just the Hebrew belief in the eventual coming of the Messiah - not a movement to physically repatriate Jews to their home of 2000 years ago.

I agree that Israel has a right to exist for pragmatic, rational reasons - I.e. the wars have been fought, the evictees are mostly dead, and the bodies are already in the ground - to try to reverse that would only result in more bloodshed.  However, the whole world opposes the continued illegal settlement process, as it pours petrol on the situation.  The only reason it continues is that the Zionist settlers believe they’re part of something which is greater than international law, and they’re supported by Christian fundamentalists in the US who’re still hoping for Armageddon.

If any of the above sounds in any way rational, you’ve got better eyesight than me.  If you do look at the link I’ve included above, click on the ‘about’ tab - that organisation's viewpoint on Israel/Palestine are exactly the same as mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Zoo Music Girl said:

Yeah issue with hire car is cost really. We spent over £200 for a weekend visit back in July. God knows what it would be over Christmas! Will look into it though.

Sounds painful. All the more reason to go down the train route.

People are overwhelmingly static on trains so you are only really at risk from the small number of people near you. And they'll be wearing masks. And the windows should be open. Doesn't feel like a major risk such as a maskless pub or a crammed tube train. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

They probably would, yeah. Hence why I'm so torn really. Seems mean to not see them for a fairly minimal risk and there will be added pressure as everyone else will be doing it, in their eyes at least. Throughout the pandemic me and my partner have been far more wary than all of our parents so it makes it a bit tricky to always be the bad guys saying no to stuff.

I know you guys have been very diligent with the rules so it’s gonna be tough!

 

9 minutes ago, xxialac said:

Yeah, the messaging on this will be chaotic, confused and last minute.

Ironic that Johnson was sold to the public as a great communicator and he has presided over chronically bad communication on his watch. The Cabinet don't even know the rules - how can the public?

That’s what happens when you put together a bunch of the Vote Leave tools in a cabinet and ask them to run a country in a crises. 
 

6 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/11/21/exclusive-two-covid-tests-week-could-win-people-freedom-pass/

I have a feeling this won't be as temporary as they say. Papers please....

I hate the phrasing in this type of thing ‘win freedom’, people have their freedom now. Try living in North Korea or in some of the countries in Africa where freedoms are truly limited. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

I know you guys have been very diligent with the rules so it’s gonna be tough!

 

That’s what happens when you put together a bunch of the Vote Leave tools in a cabinet and ask them to run a country in a crises. 
 

I hate the phrasing in this type of thing ‘win freedom’, people have their freedom now. Try living in North Korea or in some of the countries in Africa where freedoms are truly limited. 

Um, no. You can not argue that we have our freedom when people are literally banned from socialising with people they don’t live with. It’s perfectly legitimate to argue that these curbs are necessary and appropriate, but you cannot argue we have our freedom. You’re moving the goalposts here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, xxialac said:

Sounds painful. All the more reason to go down the train route.

People are overwhelmingly static on trains so you are only really at risk from the small number of people near you. And they'll be wearing masks. And the windows should be open. Doesn't feel like a major risk such as a maskless pub or a crammed tube train. 

No I know. We have got trains several times to visit people this year, so it's not like I haven't done it. Those trains were all very empty compared to normal though. My worry really is that if everyone is given one week to visit everyone then trains will be packed even more than they usually are around Christmas (so standing most of the way, rammed in between seats etc). We can get a cab to the station but not for visiting my parents as just too far away really, so tube will be involved too.

I know the risks are minimal in the grand scheme of things. I think my point really is just that I'm not arsed about Christmas so it feels weird to be taking risks when I don't need to, just because other people want us to. We made the assessment to visit people back in summer based on mainly being outdoors and numbers being low so feels weird to willingly go out of our way to introduce risk at this time of year.

Will see what happens in next few weeks. 

Edited by Zoo Music Girl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

don't know if anybody mentioned this one thats been doing the rounds from have i got news for you some days ago.

usually i'm all for comedy reaching into uncomfortable places, even if something close to my heart is the butt of the joke, but this guy jokes that he would see glastonbury bombed on account of its full of corbyn and bob dylan fans...

i found it hard to believe the bbc didn't edit it out?

it was shocking, but not witty, or funny at all really. & given in recent years there has been a pattern of attacks against for example the bataclan, the MEN and other large events - not to mention attacks by fascists on the left - utoya in norway, jo cox etc. i'd be lying if i said that it had never crossed my mind that glastonbury would presumably be a good target for terrorists. maybe it is just because its closer to home but i thought it was extremely poor taste. and even worse that nobody challenged him, including labour peer joan bakewell.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

No I know. We have got trains several times to visit people several times this year, so it's not like I haven't done it. Those trains were all very empty compared to normal though. My worry really is that if everyone is given one week to visit everyone than trains will be packed even more than they usually are around Christmas (so standing most of the way, rammed in between seats etc). We can get a cab to the station but not for visiting my parents as just too far away really, so tube will be involved too.

I know the risks are minimal in the grand scheme of things. I think my point really is just that I'm not arsed about Christmas so it feels weird to be taking risks when I don't need to, just because or her people want us too. We made the assessment to visit people back in summer based on mainly being outdoors and numbers being low so feels weird to willingly go out of our way to introduce risk at this time of year.

Will see what happens in next few weeks. 

Sounds very sensible to me. 

Your parents have presumably both had dozens and dozens of Christmases plus will be getting the vaccine early in the New Year. There's a real argument for Tough Love here. Easter or whenever can be celebrated exactly as you would have done Christmas only with the ability to hug, relax and feel like a proper celebration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, xxialac said:

Sounds very sensible to me. 

Your parents have presumably both had dozens and dozens of Christmases plus will be getting the vaccine early in the New Year. There's a real argument for Tough Love here. Easter or whenever can be celebrated exactly as you would have done Christmas only with the ability to hug, relax and feel like a proper celebration.

All true. I think my parents would understand if we made the call not to see them. My partner's parents, particularly his mum, will be more of an issue I feel!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...