Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, xxialac said:

Maybe if they stopped writing consulting guff about "deliverables being crystallised" and actually focused on the practicalities of what it needed to work, it wouldn't be such a disaster.

Along with sacking Dido Harding .... and paying people sensible amounts to isolate !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, crazyfool1 said:

aw crap :( 

But but but.....tests went up massively yesterdayby like 70k or so, so measured against today's positive cases means overall % Positivity is down again today.

Ooh...and just shouting out @stevieweviefor my 1000th upvote.  Cheers bud 👍

Edited by parsonjack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, parsonjack said:

But but but.....tests went up massively yesterdayby like 70k or so, so measured against today's positive cases means overall % Positivity is down again today.

Always there to steer me  back on course :) congrats on the 1000 .... I was beaten to it as id run out :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, crazyfool1 said:

Always there to steer me  back on course :) congrats on the 1000 .... I was beaten to it as id run out :) 

I know it’s hard mate but try not to isolate one particular days figures. If they are higher than you thought try not to worry overly and equally if they appear low then bear in mind that it’s probably outrider and they could go up again the next day. It is tough but try not to panic over them, look at the trends and where they are heading. Sorry if this is preachy, I don’t mean it to be!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

I know it’s hard mate but try not to isolate one particular days figures. If they are higher than you thought try not to worry overly and equally if they appear low then bear in mind that it’s probably outrider and they could go up again the next day. It is tough but try not to panic over them, look at the trends and where they are heading. Sorry if this is preachy, I don’t mean it to be!

All good :) ive been on the corona coaster for long enough :) thanks though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

I know it’s hard mate but try not to isolate one particular days figures. If they are higher than you thought try not to worry overly and equally if they appear low then bear in mind that it’s probably outrider and they could go up again the next day. It is tough but try not to panic over them, look at the trends and where they are heading. Sorry if this is preachy, I don’t mean it to be!

....and for the first time in many weeks the weekly case trend is down.  Are we turning a corner here?

 

Screenshot_20201119-181250_Chrome.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, parsonjack said:

....and for the first time in many weeks the weekly case trend is down.  Are we turning a corner here?

 

Screenshot_20201119-181250_Chrome.jpg

Potentially but the average is skewed by the 30k plus we saw last Thursday, so if anything I’d say we are kind of staying put. If you take out that 30k then for cases in England (20,291) it’s not much down from 21,237 two weeks ago, even if tests are up a bit lately. We aren’t seeing any large consistent rises but is this quick enough for the end of lockdown in 2 weeks? I’m not so sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Potentially but the average is skewed by the 30k plus we saw last Thursday, so if anything I’d say we are kind of staying put. If you take out that 30k then for cases in England (20,291) it’s not much down from 21,237 two weeks ago, even if tests are up a bit lately. We aren’t seeing any large consistent rises but is this quick enough for the end of lockdown in 2 weeks? I’m not so sure. 

if we move into tiers it might be .... it just won't be advertised as a national lockdown ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Potentially but the average is skewed by the 30k plus we saw last Thursday, so if anything I’d say we are kind of staying put. If you take out that 30k then for cases in England (20,291) it’s not much down from 21,237 two weeks ago, even if tests are up a bit lately. We aren’t seeing any large consistent rises but is this quick enough for the end of lockdown in 2 weeks? I’m not so sure. 

Good points....and yes, I'm far from certain we have enough evidence yet to end it in 13 days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

you would hope so...if this lockdown isn't working what next? Close schools etc?

I would think a week earlier breakup at Christmas would be quite a sensible idea ... not a lot of missed work and a benefit of not mixing for an extra week before visits to Grandparents .... for some anyway 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Potentially but the average is skewed by the 30k plus we saw last Thursday, so if anything I’d say we are kind of staying put. If you take out that 30k then for cases in England (20,291) it’s not much down from 21,237 two weeks ago, even if tests are up a bit lately. We aren’t seeing any large consistent rises but is this quick enough for the end of lockdown in 2 weeks? I’m not so sure

Not even remotely quick enough. But we knew this going into it. Apparently our prime minister didn't and will rely fully on semantics come next week's parliamentary debates

4 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

I would think a week earlier breakup at Christmas would be quite a sensible idea ... not a lot of missed work and a benefit of not mixing for an extra week before visits to Grandparents .... for some anyway 

To be honest it probably needs to be longer with the kids to parents transmission cycle but this will take some of the risk away 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

flu vaccines every year, that's what I mean...I know not same scale...

It's not the same scale, but it's certainly comparable. Given the resources being allocated, I suspect the bottleneck is likely to be vaccine supply rather than the ability to deliver it.

So - in a typical year (ie not this year) - approximately 15 million people would receive the flu vaccine over the space of about 8 weeks in October and November. This happens without causing significant strain on services, and without anywhere near the level of priority, attention, and funding that a COVID vaccine rollout is being given. While I've not seen any numbers for this year, the government said they wanted to increase that to 30m this year. I doubt they'll actually hit that, but from what I've heard the main problems have been about supply rather than capacity to carry it out and the number should still be way up on last year.

On that basis, it's reasonable to assume that if a vaccine is available (and can be manufactured in sufficient quantities) that can use the same infrastructure / people (which the Oxford one can), then it should be possible able to deliver well over 30 million shots by about Easter without extra resource. Add in extra resources (as provided for by the bill passed a couple months back that allows more people including medical students to deliver the shot) then it's not unrealistic to deliver a shot to every adult in the country by Easter.

That's ignoring and completely separate to the dedicated vaccination centres that every PCT has been asked to set up by the start of December, and that are seemingly designed for a rollout of the Pfizer vaccine - once those are in place they should create capacity for at minimum a million or so doses a week and if things work out a lot more than that - though obviously that's a lot more untested.

I increasingly get the impression that we're going to end up with 2 independent vaccination programmes running in parallel - the Oxford one using the same people and places that provided the flu vaccine over the past few weeks, and the Pfizer one using the dedicated centres. I wouldn't be surprised if a designation is made along the lines of Oxford goes to age range X, Pfizer to age range Y - with the effect that a lot of people not on the priority list get offered a shot sooner than some on the priority list do (as they're waiting on the other vaccine).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This might be the highest numbered thread for a long time... 

As per vaccines we now have 3 nearly ready to go.. Might take time but light at the end of the tunnel and all that.. Gotta hope that the Oxford one comes through as that's really the best of the lot.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, duke88 said:

Yes, but that's a two-dose one - so that leaves 5 million people for the whole of the UK by the end of the year, Scotland aren't going to get 20% of that allocation, when they make up 8% of the UK population

It must be on the assumption that Oxford/AZ is approved in the next 2-3 weeks. We have 100m of that on order and they started manufacturing is months ago. I just read a story from July saying they were starting production, aiming to be able to start rollout in autumn. I've not been able to find any figures, but it wouldn't surprise me if we had 20m doses already in the UK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ozanne said:

I know it’s hard mate but try not to isolate one particular days figures. If they are higher than you thought try not to worry overly and equally if they appear low then bear in mind that it’s probably outrider and they could go up again the next day. It is tough but try not to panic over them, look at the trends and where they are heading. Sorry if this is preachy, I don’t mean it to be!

Preach it brother! I've been looking at the Manchester numbers and getting concerned when the numbers don't drop every day, even though every single day shows a week on week decrease. The week on week number is the one to look at unless you're really straining to find a recent change in the trends. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...