Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, gordong said:

While I am increasingly optimistic for next year, does anyone else think June is slightly too soon? If they moved it to September as was previously rumoured, I reckon it’s almost a certainty. 

I think if they are going to be vaccinating with Pfizer end of this month and ( depending on how the results go) Oxford from December, they'll open up by end of March. They are waiting for the death rate to go down enough for them to put it in the background

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, zahidf said:

I think if they are going to be vaccinating with Pfizer end of this month and ( depending on how the results go) Oxford from December, they'll open up by end of March. They are waiting for the death rate to go down enough for them to put it in the background

Just like they did when opening things up this summer ... without a vaccine 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

Just like they did when opening things up this summer ... without a vaccine 

Yup. 

 

Its worth nothing that Merkel couldn't get her further restrictions passed their parliament equivalent and there were massive demonstrations in Italy and Spain against further restrictions.

The scientists will try to say we need restrictions with the vaccines but id say good luck with that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Snap polling by YouGov on Corbyn and divided parties:

 

Such an easy get out for the tories. They have the shite response to this pandemic, fuckknowswhat from brexit, and then everything...and they'll just keep on winning because labour will be bickering amongst themselve forever. Fuckin useless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, crazyfool1 said:

more brutal to me would be the loss of loved ones to the virus .... Its really only one day ... and hopefully plenty more to come ... that said I o understand that some might feel it more necessary 

Not my place to tell you what to do, but I question if seeing your family on their doorstep etc will really have much of an impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, xxialac said:

I think everyone who prioritises a meaningless day over the health of the people you share this island with is irresponsible. 

It's an arbitrary date.

Have your enjoyable family time once we are out of the woods, pick a day then and call it [insert name of preferred cultural celebration here].

 

This is just utter nonsense. Ok we get it- you don't like Xmas. It is not meaningless to so many. This forum is genuinely baffling at times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Ozanne said:

I also find it a bit strange that we are reportedly going to set aside these 5 days for Christmas, but didn't do that for Eid, why didn't people of that faith bet that treatment?

I'll probs face the wrath of some of the more politically correct efestivalers here but is it not blindingly obvious why there might be an exception for Xmas and not Eid?

Britain is at least to some degree still a christian country and Xmas is a national holiday every year. Why do kids get 2 weeks off at xmas and not Eid? Do you complain about that?

Easter is more important to Christians anyway and that was 'cancelled'. Not everything is a racist conspiracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

Not my place to tell you what to do, but I question if seeing your family on their doorstep etc will really have much of an impact.

Absolutely fair comment ... something I will be considering... unless they go to my brothers for the day ( up to them ) ... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DickButkis said:

https://twitter.com/margarethodge/status/1328771756056846336?s=20 

This from a woman who made money in apartheid South Africa during the boycott trying to smear a man who was arrested for protesting against it. But somehow Corbyn is the racist.

So because one person is a racist it logically follows that the person they're criticizing can't be a racist? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

I'll probs face the wrath of some of the more politically correct efestivalers here but is it not blindingly obvious why there might be an exception for Xmas and not Eid?

Britain is at least to some degree still a christian country and Xmas is a national holiday every year. Why do kids get 2 weeks off at xmas and not Eid? Do you complain about that?

Easter is more important to Christians anyway and that was 'cancelled'. Not everything is a racist conspiracy.

Eid and Diwali and Yom Kippur and other religious festivals simply aren’t important to the majority of people in the UK. Christmas is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, topmarksbri said:

So because one person is a racist it logically follows that the person they're criticizing can't be a racist? 

I can't understand even why it's acceptable she is a Labour MP to begin with. It also just further highlights an agenda against a man who has fought racism all his life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, topmarksbri said:

There is absolutely zero chance this kind of stuff would be posted had it been Boris/Islamaphobia. Really does blow my mind that otherwise tolerant people can't see the hurt it causes the jewish community. 

Its a false equivalence as Boris has said and published articles which contain islamophobic things whilst Corbyn hasn’t.

If Corbyn had been falsely accused of islamophobia I would still post that meme. It has nothing to do with Judaism and I’m so bored of this weird overreach by the campaign for antisemitism bods.
 

Honestly, someone had commented on Len McCluskey’s tweet yesterday saying that the fact he’d used the word persecution, whilst saying that Corbyn was being persecuted, was somehow a reference to that jewish ppl persecuted Jesus and therefore was some veiled antisemitism ’dogwhistle’ whatever the fudge a ’dogwhistle’ is. Thats another thing, seems like everything is a ’dogwhistle ’ or ’unconscionable’ these days. This weird thing where a Guardian journo uses a word in a column and then centrist twitter seems to repeat it ad-nauseum to express their fake shock and horror. Whats the word this week Marina? Do me a favour

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

Such an easy get out for the tories. They have the shite response to this pandemic, fuckknowswhat from brexit, and then everything...and they'll just keep on winning because labour will be bickering amongst themselve forever. Fuckin useless.

Yep. It's fucking pathetic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, topmarksbri said:

There is absolutely zero chance this kind of stuff would be posted had it been Boris/Islamaphobia. Really does blow my mind that otherwise tolerant people can't see the hurt it causes the jewish community. 

If there was an attack on Labour from a fundamentalist Muslim group who were keen on female genital mutilation, I'd tell them to fuck off.  If there were an attack on Labour from Christian fundamentalists who were upset about contraception or abortion, I'd tell them to fuck off.  The source of these antisemitism claims are the Jewish Labour Movement, who are opposed by left wing Jewish groups for being a politically-motivated Zionist group.  Zionism comes with the same irrational baggage as the rest of the religious fundamentalist nutters, e.g. believing their magic Iron Age book gives them a divine right to lands which other people are already living on.

If you want to stand by the fundamentalists along with Trump and co., that's your choice, but left wing Jewish groups will get extremely angry and offended that you're equating that with standing up for Jews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mattiloy said:

Its a false equivalence as Boris has said and published articles which contain islamophobic things whilst Corbyn hasn’t.

Zionists don't understand Irony? Liking/commenting on a mural showing clearly antisemitic tropes?

5 minutes ago, mattiloy said:

Honestly, someone had commented on Len McCluskey’s tweet yesterday saying that the fact he’d used the word persecution, whilst saying that Corbyn was being persecuted, was somehow a reference to that jewish ppl persecuted Jesus and therefore was some veiled antisemitism ’dogwhistle’ whatever the fudge a ’dogwhistle’ is. Thats another thing, seems like everything is a ’dogwhistle ’ or ’unconscionable’ these days. This weird thing where a Guardian journo uses a word in a column and then centrist twitter seems to repeat it ad-nauseum to express their fake shock and horror. Whats the word this week Marina? Do me a favour

This is clearly rubbish and not antisemitism but this doesn't mean that there issues that are aren't an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...