Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Billie Eilish


Matt42

Recommended Posts

Just now, Matt42 said:

Said in the other thread but surely there’s a chance she has some kind of guest now. Can’t think who it would be though.

I think no time to die will come back into the setlist for Glasto tho.

Yeah I’d expect her to bring somebody out, but don’t see her just repeating the Damon thing.

My head goes directly to our mate Chris, but think he might still be hurt from the ‘19 ‘backlash’ so perhaps he’ll stay away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, FloorFiller said:

Yeah I’d expect her to bring somebody out, but don’t see her just repeating the Damon thing.

My head goes directly to our mate Chris, but think he might still be hurt from the ‘19 ‘backlash’ so perhaps he’ll stay away.

Maybe Stormzy as they are pals? Slightly unforeseen but welcomed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FloorFiller said:

Yeah I’d expect her to bring somebody out, but don’t see her just repeating the Damon thing.

My head goes directly to our mate Chris, but think he might still be hurt from the ‘19 ‘backlash’ so perhaps he’ll stay away.

He can't stay away after 4 years surely! No doubt in my mind he'll be somewhere after the gap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Said in the other thread but surely there’s a chance she has some kind of guest now. Can’t think who it would be though.

I think no time to die will come back into the setlist for Glasto tho.

Yeah if she doesn’t play her only UK number one during a Pyramid headline show then she’s asking for trouble 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

Yeah if she doesn’t play her only UK number one during a Pyramid headline show then she’s asking for trouble 

I wouldn’t be surprised if she does play it, but be in trouble if she doesn’t play a pretty mediocre Bond ballad? I don’t think so; it ain’t Skyfall, and she’s certainly got enough to fill a set without it as she’s been doing all tour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Genuinely think Billie Eilish will go down as one of the worst headliners ever at Glastonbury. Not only is her music bad, her live show is flat and boring, and as stated above she doesn't have the hits for a pyramid headline slot. The average person would probably only recognise Bad Guy and No Time to Die. Not a Taylor Swift fan (although Folklore was decent), but its a massive step down going from her to Billie.

Edited by downtherabbithole
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FloorFiller said:

I wouldn’t be surprised if she does play it, but be in trouble if she doesn’t play a pretty mediocre Bond ballad? I don’t think so; it ain’t Skyfall, and she’s certainly got enough to fill a set without it as she’s been doing all tour.

Not saying it’s any good but for casual fans (which will be 90% of the Pyramid crowd) it’s her second biggest second song behind Bad Guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Matt42 said:

I personally think Foals will have quite a measly crowd against Billie. Billie will pull a lot of people + the casuals. Also think Primal Scream at the same time will chip away at Foals crowd a fair bit.

Do we have into Primal Scream are Friday? Had them in my head for Sunday if anything, when there doesn’t seem to be another rock headliner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Do we have into Primal Scream are Friday? Had them in my head for Sunday if anything, when there doesn’t seem to be another rock headliner. 

I was literally about to ask this off @Matt42's post. I thought they were Sunday? I haven't seen Primal Scream live since 2006!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Do we have into Primal Scream are Friday? Had them in my head for Sunday if anything, when there doesn’t seem to be another rock headliner. 

I thought it was Primal, ???, Charli in that order?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

It’s very hard to keep up this year 

Largely because there are so many big acts on the poster who could either realistically be taking smaller stage headliner slots or midday larger stage slots, and with little indication of what day they’re all playing. Gonna be a lot of surprises and ‘duh’ moments from us come the full lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Yeah I’d expect her to bring somebody out, but don’t see her just repeating the Damon thing.

My head goes directly to our mate Chris, but think he might still be hurt from the ‘19 ‘backlash’ so perhaps he’ll stay away.

Quick deep dive: Gorillaz have a show in Berlin on Glasto-Friday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...