Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Hot Chip


suzie sue

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, morph100 said:

Saw they covered beastie boys sabotage, looked good, shame they clash with everyone I want to see 

That clash is killing me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

You saw them at Gorilla, do you need to see the same (admittedly very good) set again in a different place where you can't see them as well?

By the time Glasto comes around I'll have seen Hot Chip three times in 2.5 months. 

Still can't decide between Hot Chip and Chems. Even considering first half of Chems and then up for most of Hot Chip but that seems silly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Woffy said:

See you at Hot Chip fella. 

We both know this ??

41 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

You saw them at Gorilla, do you need to see the same (admittedly very good) set again in a different place where you can't see them as well?

I am going to Bluedot and seeing them in Amsterdam. There will also be another Manchester date. It is still a killer clash. Hot Chip is a sure fire great time ?‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, eastynh said:

That clash is killing me.

A genuine dilemma.

It’s beyond music now, I’m going to have to factor in the stage, where I’m likely to be before hand and where I want to go straight after.

On music alone I can’t separate them. 

When the full line up and times are out I’ll decide. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, nikkic said:

A genuine dilemma.

It’s beyond music now, I’m going to have to factor in the stage, where I’m likely to be before hand and where I want to go straight after.

On music alone I can’t separate them. 

When the full line up and times are out I’ll decide. 

Yeah this exactly. 

APE has made it worse for me if anything. I enjoyed Chems more on the day but then it wasn’t a fair comparison because Hot Chip need to be given their chance to shine during a longer headline set (plus it’s on the Park stage!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Phoenix Girl said:

Yeah this exactly. 

APE has made it worse for me if anything. I enjoyed Chems more on the day but then it wasn’t a fair comparison because Hot Chip need to be given their chance to shine during a longer headline set (plus it’s on the Park stage!)

I’ve never seen a Park headliner so that’s a huge draw. 

Plus the Chems set is likely to be fairly similar, where as HC will obvs get more time than at APE. 

But still, it’s The Chems.

Let’s see how the subs pan out first.

I’ll take solace in knowing whichever choice we make, it will be awesome!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Phoenix Girl said:

Yeah this exactly. 

APE has made it worse for me if anything. I enjoyed Chems more on the day but then it wasn’t a fair comparison because Hot Chip need to be given their chance to shine during a longer headline set (plus it’s on the Park stage!)

Whoaaa there little lady, you were chastising me the other day for having doubts ??

Its got to be Hot Chip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, eastynh said:

Whoaaa there little lady, you were chastising me the other day for having doubts ??

Its got to be Hot Chip.

I know, I know ?. Honestly, I think this is the hardest decision I’ve ever had to make! 

I think @nikkic is right, we just need to stop thinking about it now until we have all the relevant information.

And then we’ll all go to Hot Chip on the Park and have an absolute blast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, zeppelin said:

Fixed that for you ;)

???

14 minutes ago, Phoenix Girl said:

?? 

I once had to choose between David Guetta and the Stone Roses. I chose Guetta and do not regret it, had a ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2019 at 6:51 PM, briddj said:

They confirmed your rock-solid Ally Pally info at APE yesterday.

Oh did they? Haha. I saw something flash across the screen but wasn’t sure if it was for hot chip or someone else, is that what you meant? Thought they were fantastic, it’ll be great to see them play a longer set in October. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Martini Police said:

Oh did they? Haha. I saw something flash across the screen but wasn’t sure if it was for hot chip or someone else, is that what you meant? Thought they were fantastic, it’ll be great to see them play a longer set in October. 

No the band confirmed on stage that there next london gig is ally pally

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2019 at 11:13 PM, briddj said:

By the time Glasto comes around I'll have seen Hot Chip three times in 2.5 months. 

Still can't decide between Hot Chip and Chems. Even considering first half of Chems and then up for most of Hot Chip but that seems silly. 

Any chance of getting close for Hot Chip if you do that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...