Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, Wooderson said:

'15 and '16 werent great were they? Yuck.

Radiohead last time round restored my faith however. Crystal clear audio and unless you were up the front an absolute blancmange visually.

Trippy and fabulous.

I had a ticket for Radiohead at Old Trafford for later in the year, so I watched The Flaming Lips on the Park. I heard mixed reviews of Radiohead... but when I watched it back - it looked good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

Less likely to headline if anything but definitely doesn't rule them out

Surely Glastonbury aren’t going to have 3 of the APE headers?! Christine and the Queens, The Strokes and The Chemical Brothers all heavily linked.  

Not sure that’ll be right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sisco said:

Surely Glastonbury aren’t going to have 3 of the APE headers?! Christine and the Queens, The Strokes and The Chemical Brothers all heavily linked.  

Not sure that’ll be right. 

Don't see why not, it's not like any of them are exclusive and of those three only one will headline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hugh Jass said:

Don't see why not, it's not like any of them are exclusive and of those three only one will headline.

Wasn’t really talking from Glastonbury’s point of view it was more from APE.  Hardly a great selling point that you can see all our headers at another festival.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sisco said:

Wasn’t really talking from Glastonbury’s point of view it was more from APE.  Hardly a great selling point that you can see all our headers at another festival.  

Depending on how they're selling they could always ask GF to leave Christine and/or the Chems off of the first poster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
2 minutes ago, sisco said:

Wasn’t really talking from Glastonbury’s point of view it was more from APE.  Hardly a great selling point that you can see all our headers at another festival.  

but only if you already have a ticket.

And anyway, as one-day events in the middle of a major city they're mainly selling to a different market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know APE hasn't been going that long (to my knowledge) but from what I can see from previous lineups it seems to be Pyramid sub/Other headliners topping the bill from what I can see. I really can't see The Strokes accepting a sub slot at Glastonbury if they're headlining everywhere else they play

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First time poster! Been reading this forum since 2014. 

Not sure if it’s been discussed, but is there no chance Bon Iver could be headlining? Arguably much bigger than most mentioned. Would be divisive I’m sure, but perfect headliner for me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

but only if you already have a ticket.

And anyway, as one-day events in the middle of a major city they're mainly selling to a different market.

Yeah I do appreciate it, but it’d still surprise me if at least 3 of their headliners play prominent spots at the same festival. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
2 minutes ago, sisco said:

Yeah I do appreciate it, but it’d still surprise me if at least 3 of their headliners play prominent spots at the same festival. 

It wouldn't me. The nature of things is that there's only so many bands to go round, and with Glastonbury having such a big line-up it's impossible not to have a lot of acts at both.

And if APE wants exclusive that's going to cost them more to book that act - which is probably pretty risky when they couldn't sell out many of last year's shows when there wasn't the competition of Glastonbury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

Less likely to headline if anything but definitely doesn't rule them out

If they have a headline slot somewhere else, they’re not taking a lower paying, lower slot at Glastonbury. I think if anything it’s ruled out the chances of that.

I would say the headline slot is still on the table. It’s quite clear that all six APE headliners aren’t the same size as one another - just like The Killers and Solange aren’t equal headliners, nor are Florence and whoever else is headlining Boardmasters this year - so any equations like ‘APE headliner equals Pyramid sub’ is daft.

Also if Glastonbury stops booking headliners that are doing any festival less than about 60k then it’ll run out of headliners pretty fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, emmo88 said:

First time poster! Been reading this forum since 2014. 

Not sure if it’s been discussed, but is there no chance Bon Iver could be headlining? Arguably much bigger than most mentioned. Would be divisive I’m sure, but perfect headliner for me!

No chance Bon Ivor’s headlining. At least people have actually heard of The Strokes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, emmo88 said:

First time poster! Been reading this forum since 2014. 

Not sure if it’s been discussed, but is there no chance Bon Iver could be headlining? Arguably much bigger than most mentioned. Would be divisive I’m sure, but perfect headliner for me!

I am so Rubbish, are Bon Iver big? do they have a big following , or are they a new band ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

No chance Bon Ivor’s headlining. At least people have actually heard of The Strokes.

I have heard of the strokes, 

 

didn't realise they were still alive, are they doing new music?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, emmo88 said:

First time poster! Been reading this forum since 2014. 

Not sure if it’s been discussed, but is there no chance Bon Iver could be headlining? Arguably much bigger than most mentioned. Would be divisive I’m sure, but perfect headliner for me!

No chance of Bon Iver playing I'm afraid, they're in the US that weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dentalplan said:

Kanye coming on to ruin Bon Iver’s headline set.

i watched the whole Kanye set again recently, it was brilliant up until those 15-20mins in the middle when he killed the vibe completely. take that out, and the 5mins fannying around getting on the boom lift and it would have been excellent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...