Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2016


thewayiam

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

word I heard is that Glastonbury don't see them as headliners, tho I can't verify that's true.

And if Biffy are co-headining Reading/Leeds this year as I've been told they are, then I think it's fair to say that Glastonbury have a fair point.

Yeah, you said before. Personally I think the festival has little to lose and much to gain by giving borderline acts a shot at it, but obviously the Eavii disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just now, theevilfridge said:

Yeah, you said before. Personally I think the festival has little to lose and much to gain by giving borderline acts a shot at it, but obviously the Eavii disagree.

But surely Biffys shot when they were a borderline act was in 2013 when they headlined R/L? Not Glastonbury HQs fault that, in their eyes, they didn't manage to sustain the momentum given by that. How many shots at headlining do a band need to be given? Until they stick as a headliner? I know by all accounts they nailed those festival headline sets, but for one reason or another they're now not deemed worthy to repeat them (even at a festival they did one at) so why should Glastonbury have a weak headliner because of it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Grayman said:

I agree... Vertigo of Bliss in full would be amazing. Not sure how many people would be there for that though. Lots of people got into Biffy since they've become more 'poppy'.  Still, it would be great to have us long time fans having a sing song of toys toys toys...

I had my tongue firmly planted in my cheek with that comment :P there's more of a chance of Pink Floyd and TOOL doing a co-headline deal than there is of Biffy headlining Glastonbury playing Vertigo in full!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
13 minutes ago, theevilfridge said:

Yeah, you said before. Personally I think the festival has little to lose and much to gain by giving borderline acts a shot at it, but obviously the Eavii disagree.

while that's true, should the festival be turning away bigger and better options if they're available instead?

I'm sure that's a dilemma for every booker every year, and they have to manage their way thru it in the way they think is best for the festival for both the year they're booking for and for future years.

And with regard to the bands who are still coming up rather than strongly established as headliners, the up-coming bands are far easier to book so can be slotted in at any time, while the biggest acts tend to have much more erratic availability - meaning you have to book the big acts when available, and fall back towards the upcoming acts when they're not.

Given that Glastonbury has es6tablished itself as the best festival in the world by doing things the way it does things, I don't think they can really be knocked for it. They're definitely doing something right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

Given that Glastonbury has es6tablished itself as the best festival in the world by doing things the way it does things, I don't think they can really be knocked for it. They're definitely doing something right.

Interestingly though the things that make Glastonbury "the best festival" are all the things that aren't the Pyramid and Other stage in my opinion.  If you removed West Holts, Park, Dance area, Night time, Cabaret, etc. and just had Pyramid, Other, JP and maybe BBC Introducing, I think it would struggle to differentiate itself from IOW or Reading. ... it is everything outside of these big bookings that sprinkle the magic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, HoTWire said:

Interestingly though the things that make Glastonbury "the best festival" are all the things that aren't the Pyramid and Other stage in my opinion.  If you removed West Holts, Park, Dance area, Night time, Cabaret, etc. and just had Pyramid, Other, JP and maybe BBC Introducing, I think it would struggle to differentiate itself from IOW or Reading. ... it is everything outside of these big bookings that sprinkle the magic. 

Maybe true but it's the overall reputation of the festival that leads to big acts wanting to do it, so whether or not Adele headlining is your thing, it's not something any of those other festivals could've dreamed of making happen (if it does happen, that is). Remove the Pyramid and those special headliners and you remove a piece of what it is (or at least, what it's become, for better or for worse). It definitely wouldn't have the same esteem without them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gnomicide said:

So... we're coming up to 10am, last Friday in February... What's the chances?

Higher than most times as we know we are in the "2 weeks" window Emily mentioned.

With 6 days to go on it. I'd say slightly better than 6/1 as I dont remember any saturday announcements previously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
13 minutes ago, HoTWire said:

Interestingly though the things that make Glastonbury "the best festival" are all the things that aren't the Pyramid and Other stage in my opinion.  If you removed West Holts, Park, Dance area, Night time, Cabaret, etc. and just had Pyramid, Other, JP and maybe BBC Introducing, I think it would struggle to differentiate itself from IOW or Reading. ... it is everything outside of these big bookings that sprinkle the magic. 

You're not wrong.

But it's only by having the biggest most popular bands on those stages that it's able to achieve the rest of it. Synergy, :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Maybe true but it's the overall reputation of the festival that leads to big acts wanting to do it, so whether or not Adele headlining is your thing, it's not something any of those other festivals could've dreamed of making happen (if it does happen, that is). Remove the Pyramid and those special headliners and you remove a piece of what it is (or at least, what it's become, for better or for worse). It definitely wouldn't have the same esteem without them

Maybe it is a symbiotic relationship... but I think Isle Of Wight does alright*, look at the last 10 years of headliners (look at the last 11 and find David Bowie).

 

*although I'm not sure Stereophonics and Faithless would find themselves in a headline at Glastonbury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

word I heard is that Glastonbury don't see them as headliners, tho I can't verify that's true.

And if Biffy are co-headining Reading/Leeds this year as I've been told they are, then I think it's fair to say that Glastonbury have a fair point.

Is it feasible that Reading already had FOB as a co-header booked before a pull out, and therefore Biffys booking is to just take that slot? It's strange they co-headline if FOB were only subs?. I don't see any other way than R&L not seeing them as outright headers themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thewayiam said:

They have all but confirmed an announcement with actually saying those words before March by replying to tweet saying Feb isn't over yet, probably not likely to do that if it wasn't going ro happen. 

 

Have they? Do you have a link to the tweet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FuzzyDunlop said:

I'll go for Tuesday 7pm on Radio 1

Is this based on any information in particular? If this is true, it'll be an Adele to headline announcement. Radio 1 certainly won't be the platform for announcing Radiohead. Maybe Muse though. Roll on a 6 Music announcement!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...