Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2016


thewayiam

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, SwedgeAntilles said:

Always strikes me that people who have a pop at the Beatles sound like they haven't listened to anything released after 'Help', well apart from Hey Jude and Let It Be.

Or maybe they have and simply didnt like it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

2 minutes ago, mrf said:

Or maybe they have and simply didnt like it?

Always a possibility, I just think it’s mental that someone could listen to the likes of Tomorrow Never Knows, Helter Skelter, Dear Prudence, Something, Glass Onion, I Want You, She’s Leaving Home and say they’re ‘boring’.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SwedgeAntilles said:

Always a possibility, I just think it’s mental that someone could listen to the likes of Tomorrow Never Knows, Helter Skelter, Dear Prudence, Something, Glass Onion, I Want You, She’s Leaving Home and say they’re ‘boring’.

Dont get me wrong, there are moments of genius. But the same can be said of so many bands that never get put up on the same pedestal as them. Unfortunately (for me) the moments of genius are spread too thinly to justify their godlike status.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't say I have any real strong feelings on the Beatles either way. It's impossible not to respect and admire their achievements and how they changed the landscape, but in terms of their actual music I can't say I've ever had that moment where it all clicks in to place. Some great songs and classic albums without a doubt, but for some reason I have never seen them as anything more than just a great band. I guess becoming a music fan in the 90s, with so much fantastic music to get up to speed with from previous generations, as well as the music being released at the time, it's difficult to fully contextualise the Beatles.

This thread is really running its course :P Arguments about the Beatles is the efestivals equivalent of every debate eventually leading to arguments about the Nazi party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mrf said:

Dont get me wrong, there are moments of genius. But the same can be said of so many bands that never get put up on the same pedestal as them. Unfortunately (for me) the moments of genius are spread too thinly to justify their godlike status.

I think a lot of their genius is in their production and the "never-been-done-before" tag which they have. Some of the stuff they were coming up with at the time really was ridiculous and so beyond their time it boggles the mind. Some of the recording techniques were revolutionary, the way they spanned across numerous genres etc... was something which had never been done before and influenced so many after them. Even if you don't like them, it's hard to deny their Godlike status.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, thatcrazypenguin said:

One of the few here probably who thinks the Beatles were an overrated act in their time, better musicians out there, better songwriters out there, better performers out there at the time.....but the Beatles got the plaudits because they after all were the good looking Liverpool lads who came along at the right time for their guitar based pop act to take off and attain cult status as it did (even if it wasn't original in the slightest)  They weren't crap, not by any means but to me I dont hear `superstars` in their music as they were made out to be. Cant help but wonder if wed remember them so fondly but for what happened away from the music and the headlines it generated. 

what the fuck are you fucking on about you fucking pikey c**t

 

 

R4B x x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of my happiest memories was on a short break to M'Bour, Southern Senegal a few years ago when I was feeling a bit down in the dumps about stuff and needed a bit of me time. Was sat at this lovely beachside bar, looking out over the Atlantic Ocean when 'Yellow Submarine' and 'Come Together' came on over the speakers. It was bloody heaven for those few minutes and I've rarely been happier. 

Never understood anyone who say's they don't like the Beatles songs. Such a variety and you can't find one or two that leave you daydreaming or bring a smile to your face?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've listened to a lot of Beatles, and alway struggled to fully get why they are classed as the best band ever. They have a lot of songs which i think are ok, and I 100% can see how they were frequently very innovative, but there isn't a single song that I absolutely adore. My favourite is Here Comes The Sun, which I think is nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eFestivals said:

banned.

Not ever coming back.

Jesus. ;)

 

Good for you, Neil. Just out of interest, did my report of that get through? I tried to report it, but it kind of froze when I submitted it and I wasn't sure. Glad to see the back of him, anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Listening to Abbey Road now.  Sublime.  I was going to make a snide remark about the Lennon songs being better (which they certainly are on Side A), but Side B of this album must be Paul's finest hour.

Tends to change but I find it hard not to have Abbey Road as my favourite Beatles album. The entire medley is just a brilliant composition from start to finish. That, She’s Leaving Home and a couple of his contributions to the White Album are Paul at his very best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The beatles output is so vast, there is a lot of crap. They also did so much good stuff. It was so varied too.

Has any other band been responsible for tunes with the variety of..

I wanna hold your hand

Blackbird

Tomorrow Never Knows

Hey Jude

Revolution #9

-------

Abbey Road is by far my favourite Beatles album. Sgt. Pepper is vastly over rated in my opinion.

 

As for Roses4Baggie... what a tool. He must get a kick out of it. 

Edited by FuzzyDunlop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...