Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

Look I don't know mate. I've brought up this forum to friends at parties and gatherings, just in general chit chat. This guy has referenced me twice now with no motivation whatsoever.

My mate (I use the term loosely) Jason, is known for a) his love of the stone roses, oasis and all things Gallagher and B) for trolling people online.

Its either him or im losing my marbles and this knob is just fucking with me. If it is him I can only apologise for what I've brought to this place!

Careful....could seem like you are in fact R4B? very suspect if i may add!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy on Facebook seems legit. He's posted up 2 separate photos with ME.

He also just added:

"They may well announce all except the third headliner.." in reference to the June headliner announcement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1454 pages of speculation, assumptions, secret run-ins with ME, tips from someone 'in the know'..

Have we not learned anything?

EDIT: 1454 now!

Edited by pentura
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael also said we'd have the third headliner on April 1st. Do you believe everything you read?

Would you prefer that I didn't at least make the forum aware of what appears to have been a very legitimate conversation between an eager Glasto goer and Michael today which concerned the lineup/3rd headliner. We all know Michael has come out with a lot that hasn't turned out to be true but I think you'll agree that posting the story is relevant and of interest to the forum?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unsure if I Can take another 6 weeks of this

I'm past the point of caring about the third headliner, I just want some of the other bands!!

Full lineup would be fantastic, but at this agonising rate an early poster with most of but not all of the lineup like they did last year with the TBA for Metallica would do me fine!

Fuck it, even if they just announced the subheadliners, or the other stage headliners and maybe 3/4 others dotted around the other big stages I would be happy!

Edited by DL50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very good spot that, I reckon there's a possibility that it's connected.

Do Glasto and Lollapalooza usually share similar headliners???

They did with Mum-farts in 2013

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a change Matt, I think you might be on to something, I don't see them holding off until June 1st to announce Muse, doesn't make any sense

It does though make sense that it could be the same act as playing glasto, someone that's not currently active and won't announce a return until then, il leave it with my thoughts for now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very good spot that, I reckon there's a possibility that it's connected.

Do Glasto and Lollapalooza usually share similar headliners???

It's the first ever European Lollapolooza I believe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a change Matt, I think you might be on to something, I don't see them holding off until June 1st to announce Muse, doesn't make any sense

It does though make sense that it could be the same act as playing glasto, someone that's not currently active and won't announce a return until then, il leave it with my thoughts for now

Does that point more to someone like Bowie or Prince or is that just extremely wishful thinking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a change Matt, I think you might be on to something, I don't see them holding off until June 1st to announce Muse, doesn't make any sense

It does though make sense that it could be the same act as playing glasto, someone that's not currently active and won't announce a return until then, il leave it with my thoughts for now

Nah it's Muse. They can't announce until that date because it's the day after they play two German fests they are exclusive to. Even if it doesn't end up being Muse, I can't work out why it would be connected when they're almost three months apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we think of contractual we usually think of another event or festival etc.

Could be just finishing/overproducing Roses comeback song?

Idk

Taylor Swift has sold out her BST show hasn't she?

Maybe Florence is also going to announce another date like Besitval?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...