Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

Yes, I am aware they headlined last year. They're one of the headliners in recent years I never understood - they played a bingo hall in Galway a few months before.

A lot of bands play small gigs to warm up for big shows. They also played to 60k people in Leicester the week before headlining Glasto.

(Can't beleive I'm having to defend Kasabian).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of bands play small gigs to warm up for big shows. They also played to 60k people in Leicester the week before headlining Glasto.

(Can't beleive I'm having to defend Kasabian).

When Biffy Clyro get announced next year it will be the same.

Have headined basically every festival but aren't headline status!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see both sides of the argument. The only way this will be settled is if the lineup is released today.

Personally I've never thought it would be today and have always said tomorrow so only time will tell.

Wouldn't settle it at all. There is someone on here saying it will be every day. And someone will eventually get it 'right' claiming to be in the know. A stopped clock is right twice a day.

This last bit isn't aimed at you but some of the hysteria in this thread is baffling. Really can't see why people are getting themselves worked up to the point of near insanity. Some people are having fun but others seem to genuinely spending a lot of time looking for hidden meanings in anything at all where there are none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I am aware they headlined last year. They're one of the headliners in recent years I never understood - they played a bingo hall in Galway a few months before.

What a bizarre point. There was also a band that played to approx 500 people in a club called "Echoplex" two months before headlining the festival. Care to take a guess?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With regards to releasing a poster with TBA on, would they keep two acts off this poster. As if the first one fell through and they bumped someone up, they would still need to appear as a TBA. Otherwise people would want to know who the original TBA was going to be if they do bump up.

I know I could have worded this better but hopefully people get the gist!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this stage, is anyone actually arsed about the 3rd headliner if they were to get a poster with a lot of the main stages on there? I certainly couldn't give two hoots.

I'd rather have park and west holts line up than third pyramid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shangri La doing the countdown and then saying were put on hold....WH announcing that their line up is complete but nothing leaks...

I start to believe that the Eavii want to see how many people would pay the balance with only a few acts announced and with one of them quite controversial..

If they do have someone big lined up, even if half of the people would throw back their ticket in the pot, they announce the big one before resale and the festival will be sold out in a matter of hours...

And if most of the people would pay the balance even without the line up, just confirms that the majority still goes to Glastonbury because of Glastonbury and not because of a black rapper or some white guys with guitars..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with the post by the restaurant is the "all should be revealed 2morrow" bit only says "should", and didn't necessarily come from Michael's lips. As Neil said yesterday, they might be saying that based on the comment last year about April 1st. Would be a little misleading, but that might not have been intentional.

The tweet by the waitress (presuming that's what she does there) didn't say anything about an announcement time, nor did their subsequent comment (that I've quoted above somewhere).

But by God I bloody hope something comes soon!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is exhausting...I really felt like something was coming today.

To make it worse for everyone, I still think it is Madonna.

Did Jo Whiley not ask her anything about Glastonbury at all? If she did not, that's weird. Jo Whiley talks about Glastonbury every minute that she can, why wouldn't she ask one of the rumoured headliners if it is true or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't speak for 'everyone', that would be brilliant for me. :P

I would love it too, I meant that I'm adding someone back into the mix as soon as they were pretty much ruled out!

I have two weeks off now, this announcement better come soon! Can't get anything done with it lingering around

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate the thought of Madonna headlining. I'm not gonna make a big song and dance about it, and hopefully just go and see someone else on another stage (Or like last year just go to the naughty corner). I just feel she's so irrelevant, without her appearing at the Brits, her name wouldn't be banded about at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...