Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

yes.

But i'm not saying how what when or what way.

However, a conclusion that it *must* be Prince form these words of mine would be a wrong assumption to take from my words.

No, we're all going to take your words wildly out of context and all agree you've confirmed Prince. :nyam:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not sure how much to believe you, but i believe you a hell of a lot more than the people saying they are playing (mainly because i don't want it to be the Roses)

He said he was 99% sure its not them and he would know. Told me about the reunion before it was announced.

I would want it to be the Roses only reason I asked him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never understood why Florence's only UK festival appearance would be a sub at Glastonbury? Especially in a year when she had an album to promote. Granted a Pyramid sub is fairly big .. But not huge. Headlining would make much more sense ... But then why not just announce it? .... Why this wait?

To be honest I don't even want to find out who it is anymore! I'm enjoying this convincing myself that its a different act every day!

Cuz the album mightnt be the best? Given the negative feedback Reading got for their lack of female performers it wouldnt surprise me that the G would have her on that basis alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He said he was 99% sure its not them and he would know. Told me about the reunion before it was announced.

I would want it to be the Roses only reason I asked him.

well obviously we get shitloads of people claiming to know people in the know, but i believe you! i hope we can now lay that 'rumour' to rest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

don;t think there's ever been so much uncertainty over the headliners / lineup all together - really seems like they're trying very hard to keep it all hushed this year

Which is surely why it won't be Florence? Hardly worth all the hush hush? Which in turn adds fuel to the fire for the purple one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cuz the album mightnt be the best? Given the negative feedback Reading got for their lack of female performers it wouldnt surprise me that the G would have her on that basis alone.

aye the album definitely doesn't seem like it's gonna fall on the commercial side of her first album if the first two released songs are anything to go by - i don't think Flo would have a problem subbing a mega-act like Prince (and possibly stepping up if needs be)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see myself really enjoying Prince if he plays, I'd reluctantly decide to stay for one song after Swift finishes (which IS happening, btw), be thinking "God I hate this purple prick, I'll see what the fuss is about, though". And then

DEARLY BELOVED... WE ARE GATHERED HERE TODAY TO GET THROUGH THIS THING CALLED LIFE
Cue two hours of me going mental down the front.

Edited by GETOFFAMYLAWN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, it sounds to me like he just hasn't heard anything, not that he knows that he isn't doing any UK festivals.

and it'd definitely be in Glastonbury's best interest to keep a Prince headline set as hushed as possible, especially considering their supposed history with trying to get him etc. if any act requires such silence, it's him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not the organisers, so I don't know the reason why the announcements have been staggered the way they have. Just like I don't know the reason every single other festival has staggered headliners, and for the most part, have been difficult to call this year, with probably the exception of Reading, which it appears was piss easy apart from Metallica.

As for it not being the same as before with how easy it's been leaked, maybe they're just doing better this year?

It honestly feels like people are latching onto things which are now ridiculously straight forward, and trying to blow them up into their own narrative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It honestly feels like people are latching onto things which are now ridiculously straight forward, and trying to blow them up into their own narrative.

we're possibly days away from an announcement and we have nothing - of course people are blowing things out of proportion!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What cannot be countenanced - this much is true dear friends - is that the proprietor of this fair website suggested that Emile Sandé was a potential headliner...against the better judgement of his fair maiden into the bargain.

:D

This level of grande pisstakery has had me yelling "AH FOR FUCKS SAKE!" at my computer screen more than once this winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Would you say that if it was Prince, though? Have you been asked to keep a lid on an announcement at all?

How many times?

I have not been asked to keep a lid on things. I do not know.

I have made a guess on Prince, based on a few different bits of info - not all about Prince - which have tenuously been linked together in a way that might be right but might also be wrong. I have not even moved Prince from 'rumour' status in the rumours, because there is nothing I know of to give it a better status than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...