Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

How about you start pursuing Prince to piss off his people so he doesn't end up playing again?

:sarcastic:

I bet pursuing Prince wouldn't be that hard either, he's only got little legs so you could gain ground on him pretty quickly. Then when you catch up to him, do a comedy rugby tackle and watch his funky little hat and glasses go flying, it would be excellent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When was the last time that everything (including all headliners) was released at the same time?

I think since I've been going (05 onwards) it's never happened like that and there has always been some form of confirmation from an artist or the festival prior to "line up day"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When was the last time that everything (including all headliners) was released at the same time?

I think since I've been going (05 onwards) it's never happened like that and there has always been some form of confirmation from an artist or the festival prior to "line up day"

2013 we got a big massive massive dump (inc all 3 headliners) at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I was not on efests then......

Was anything much known (i.e. TBC) prior to that?

I don't think what he said is right.

I know I was only certain about the stones on about the day they were announced (tho before they were announced). I'm pretty sure I had Arctic Monkeys a long time before that. I perhaps didn't have Mumfords as TBC before they were announced, tho they were defo rumoured.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember we weren't sure about the stones, then on the morning of the announcment they said they had an announcement. Neil got info a glasto announcment could be coming, then we drew the dots together that a glasto announcement and a stones announcement was coming at the same time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember we weren't sure about the stones, then on the morning of the announcment they said they had an announcement. Neil got info a glasto announcment could be coming, then we drew the dots together that a glasto announcement and a stones announcement was coming at the same time

I doubt that's what happened, seeing as The Stones were TBC on here before they were announced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think what he said is right.

I know I was only certain about the stones on about the day they were announced (tho before they were announced). I'm pretty sure I had Arctic Monkeys a long time before that. I perhaps didn't have Mumfords as TBC before they were announced, tho they were defo rumoured.

I have just been looking back at the very long 2013 headliners thread and I think very little was known about anything.

Oddly enough Prince was being discussed lots from page 400 onwards!!

The Stones went TBC on the morning of the annpouncement I think looking at that thread.

Edited by mattyc1965
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah we're talking in terms of what Neil had confirmed? Loads in 2013, I thought we were referring specifically to what was officially announced, where we got everything at once, but Neil had The Arctics very early on, I think it was November. Not too sure whether Mumford were SR or TBC, but we pretty much knew they'd be playing for a long time, we just all thought they'd be on before The Stones, who Neil got down as TBC shortly before the official poster. IIRC we also had Chic and Portishead as TBC? And quite a few others across the line-up. We also got a very exciting heads up from Neil "stand by yer beds!" about an hour before announcement, after 2 years of speculation because of the fallow, the boards melted with excitement. What a time it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The initial question was about confirmations from the artist or festival, mattyc1965 then asked about what was known to Neil/on here. Geoffamylawn's recollection sounds right, except I'm pretty sure Portishead were a surprise.

Looking back at the old thread I think quite a lot was unknown over all, especially at the end of Jan.

Lots of people going quite insane without any information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...