Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

The Flaming Lips show at Bestival was anything but a 'greatest hits' set for non-fans. Wayne stood on a big plinth holding a bloody baby doll if I remember correctly. Very weird. Race for the Prize (massively slowed down) and Do You Realize?? were the only 'hits' played.

Has it gone back to being a bit more fun now? That changes whether I'd be interested in seeing them or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

The Flaming Lips show at Bestival was anything but a 'greatest hits' set for non-fans. Wayne stood on a big plinth holding a bloody baby doll if I remember correctly. Very weird. Race for the Prize (massively slowed down) and Do You Realize?? were the only 'hits' played.

Has it gone back to being a bit more fun now? That changes whether I'd be interested in seeing them or not.

I honestly dont know what "hits" they have really. They are a band you either know or you dont aren they? I dont think a casual fan would know any songs at all! This was the setlist I got in May this year. I was happy with it anyway (though could have done with more pre-soft bulletin stuff as ever)

  1. Encore:
  2. Encore 2:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly dont know what "hits" they have really. They are a band you either know or you dont aren they? I dont think a casual fan would know any songs at all!

Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots, The Yeah Yeah Yeah Song, Do You Realize??, She Don't Use Jelly, Race for the Prize are all alternative 'hits'. People who aren't that into them specifically but do follow alternative music have usually heard those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still don't get this Florence headline status. Really can't see it.

Well they're British, state how much they love the festival and it seems the festival likes them too.

Not my thing musically and I think they work best inside a tent/club type venue.

Can't say they're not popular enough, and if a new album has a couple of belting songs I reckon they'll be there, given the past 2 years Sunday headliners.

I still think they'd have Adele before them though, if it was a choice.

Sundays on the pyramid, remember when they used to be good?

Headliners have gone from:

The Who

The Verve

Blur

Stevie Wonder

to

Beyonce

Mumford and Sons

Kasabian (I'll let them off 50% as I like some of their stuff)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots, The Yeah Yeah Yeah Song, Do You Realize??, She Don't Use Jelly, Race for the Prize are all alternative 'hits'. People who aren't that into them specifically but do follow alternative music have usually heard those.

fair dos. I cant recall ever hearing a flaming lips song anywhere in real life. Actually I think a couple of songs of at war with mystics got used in adverts now I think about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still don't get this Florence headline status. Really can't see it.

Number of albums reaching top 10:

Kings of Leon (in 2008) – 3

Mumford & Sons (in 2013) – 2

Arcade Fire (in 2014) – 3

Florence & The Machine (now) – 2

Number of albums reaching #1:

Kings of Leon (in 2008) – 1

Mumford & Sons (in 2013) – 1

Arcade Fire (in 2014) – 2

Florence & The Machine (now) – 2

Number of singles reaching top 10:

Kings of Leon (in 2008) – 0

Mumford & Sons (in 2013) – 0

Arcade Fire (in 2014) – 0

Florence & The Machine (now) – 2 (3 if you include Sweet Nothing)

Number of singles reaching #1:

Kings of Leon (in 2008) – 0

Mumford & Sons (in 2013) – 0

Arcade Fire (in 2014) – 0

Florence & The Machine (now) – 1 (2 if you include Sweet Nothing)

And then factor in that she would have almost certainly have a new album out by this time next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When has being awful ever stopped a terrible act of the right size and mainstream popularity headlining? :P

true

just living in the past with the older demographic i suppose! Couple of her songs are catchy and people (including Glasto) seem to like florence but when i seen her live she failed to live up to that standard.

Kasabian on the other hand seemed to go down well with the majority

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adele would be a fresh new headliner for G. I can't think of many bands/people except Gaga who isn't as big as she was massive a couple of years ago that haven't already headlined.

I can't see it being Biffy somehow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not arguing with the record sales, it's just not something I could imagining happening, I might well be totally wrong like. I'd not be anywhere near it, not my thing. I don't get why people get so arsed about every Pyramid headliner slot though, there's always something elsewhere. Mumford & Sons was the pits last year, sat on my arse bored shitless and ruined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not arguing with the record sales, it's just not something I could imagining happening, I might well be totally wrong like. I'd not be anywhere near it, not my thing. I don't get why people get so arsed about every Pyramid headliner slot though, there's always something elsewhere. Mumford & Sons was the pits last year, sat on my arse bored shitless and ruined.

If there's always something on elsewhere, why did you sit bored shitless while Mumford were playing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why are people even mentioning the name Florence and the Machine, if she headlined it would have more of a negative reaction than Mumford and Kasabian put together. Just don't mention her name again or it might actually happen.

I think the headliner should be based on how good the act is live not the commercial success of how many single sales they have. Plus if the act turns out to be a rubbish headliner it could damage their reputation and future bookings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why are people even mentioning the name Florence and the Machine, if she headlined it would have more of a negative reaction than Mumford and Kasabian put together. Just don't mention her name again or it might actually happen.

I think the headliner should be based on how good the act is live not the commercial success of how many single sales they have. Plus if the act turns out to be a rubbish headliner it could damage their reputation and future bookings.

Mumford and Kasabian were very popular headliners in the real world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...