Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Oasis


Guest

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, TheGoodOldDays said:

Just been reading through the opening pages of this thread. Hilarious how quickly we shot down the rumours in hindsight 

Had so many people mansplaining the "yearly oasis rumours" to me here and elsewhere too 😭

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, FuzzyDunlop said:

Anyone who's bought tickets through see tickets.

 

My sister bought 4 for Wembley for 2nd August, still not on the See Tickets App. My Heaton Park ones came through about 3 weeks before.

 

Anyone else had them come through very late with see?

Just checked mine and not ready yet for the same date 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FuzzyDunlop said:

Anyone who's bought tickets through see tickets.

 

My sister bought 4 for Wembley for 2nd August, still not on the See Tickets App. My Heaton Park ones came through about 3 weeks before.

 

Anyone else had them come through very late with see?

Mine are ready for 30 July on seetickets 

Edited by runningbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, TheGoodOldDays said:

Just been reading through the opening pages of this thread. Hilarious how quickly we shot down the rumours in hindsight 

 

I've just read the first 12 pages back, in the lead up to the announcement.

 

Wonderful 😅

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ben7amin_ said:

 

i am massively sorry for the disbeleif  - it felt like an outrageous suggestion at the time 

 

Hahaha.

 

I think people's doubt was completely understandable. 

 

Despite where the news came from, and being there in person the first time I had it - even I still had my doubts.

 

Things just seemed to have got so personal between the two of them.

Edited by mufcok
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mufcok said:

 

Hahaha.

 

I think people's doubt was completely understandable. 

 

Despite where the news came from, and being there in person the first time I had it - even I still had my doubts.

 

Things just seemed to have got so personal between the two of them.

 

I have heard my mate deffo knows Oasis are reforming so many times from people that the words became meaningless 

 

I guess it had to be right at some point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, mufcok said:

 

I've just read the first 12 pages back, in the lead up to the announcement.

 

Wonderful 😅

I've just done the same, but I couldn't stop at 12 so got up until the announcement. 

 

90% of the comments have aged like milk haha.

 

If you hear any 2026 whispers you'll have to put your neck on the line again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, raincityhc said:

I've just done the same, but I couldn't stop at 12 so got up until the announcement. 

 

90% of the comments have aged like milk haha.

 

If you hear any 2026 whispers you'll have to put your neck on the line again!

 

I've already started digging.

 

That screenshot that was in here a page or two back has been sent to a few people who would be in a position to find out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Ben7amin_ said:

 

I have heard my mate deffo knows Oasis are reforming so many times from people that the words became meaningless 

 

I guess it had to be right at some point

I remember a friend told me at Glastonbury in 2023 that he 'knows someone' in the industry and it was all done - what he told me at the time turned out to be exactly right, with timings of announcement and everything. 

 

I of course didn't believe a word based on exactly what you say, heard it so many times. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, danmarks said:

Just had a link for resale/limited view tickets wembley. Can help out anyone (up to 4 but depends if my car.card can take it so realistically 2 poss 3) . I know i tried for someone before and if they're on here and want them only fair for priority.  Go on sale at 5pm

 

Just wondering how much they are charging for limited view tickets if you don't mind sharing. We got tickets in the original sale for £150 each and they are in section 248 which looks as though it's behind the stage. The tickets do say 'Side Possible Restricted View' but I wondered if they are still charging the same price now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got 140 inc fees show up but couldn't check out. Don't know if that was limited though - it was all that was available. I know the black sabbath thing was 85quid for no view of the stage (son didn't bother and now he had regrets. )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, elias said:

 

Just wondering how much they are charging for limited view tickets if you don't mind sharing. We got tickets in the original sale for £150 each and they are in section 248 which looks as though it's behind the stage. The tickets do say 'Side Possible Restricted View' but I wondered if they are still charging the same price now.

Sorry. Yeah that sounds right.  Limited view caveat but still charge 150. So guessing it would be the same tickets 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ben7amin_ said:

 

i am massively sorry for the disbeleif  - it felt like an outrageous suggestion at the time 

Its almost as if a lot of the sibling disharmony was feined in the media to make a reunion seem incredibly unlikely to help stoke some sort of frenzy for tickets when the unbelievable healing of wounds was announced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Chef said:

I remember a friend told me at Glastonbury in 2023 that he 'knows someone' in the industry and it was all done - what he told me at the time turned out to be exactly right, with timings of announcement and everything. 

 

I of course didn't believe a word based on exactly what you say, heard it so many times. 

 

Had someone last week bite my head off for saying I heard the first whispers of the reunion in 2023. Man was convinced nothing had been done before spring 24 😭

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, dumbsaints said:

 

Had someone last week bite my head off for saying I heard the first whispers of the reunion in 2023. Man was convinced nothing had been done before spring 24 😭

 

Do you think they had made up by that point, or the powers that be had just set the logistics up for a 2025 reunion tour and then it was a case of getting them to bury the hatchet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, elias said:

 

Just wondering how much they are charging for limited view tickets if you don't mind sharing. We got tickets in the original sale for £150 each and they are in section 248 which looks as though it's behind the stage. The tickets do say 'Side Possible Restricted View' but I wondered if they are still charging the same price now.

A few pals went to Cardiff (Production release tickets), they paid £47.50 each. These were "restricted view" side of stage. The people they were stood by had paid £136.50 for the same view from the initial release....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Hershamboy said:

 

Do you think they had made up by that point, or the powers that be had just set the logistics up for a 2025 reunion tour and then it was a case of getting them to bury the hatchet?

 

It was the latter.

 

I said that very thing early on in this thread at the time, it didn't go down too well.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...