Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Oasis


Guest

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Franky said:

Is it only TM that do this "In demand tickets pricing"? Would make sense if no See and G&T's only had 2 tickets to sell anyway

Nobody can report on see because it doesnt work. I doubt anyone got in. Im sure they do this also on other gigs if you check. Dua Lipa for example had it. But itll be impossible to check such a thing right now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gigs and tours and seetickets are the same entity so they’ll both be down together. 
Reached the front of the line on Ticketmaster then was told that it was no longer valid and was made to join the back of 250,000 people queue. 
Managed to get through and get a cheap seat on a Wembley night and will decide nearer the time whether to go or give to a friend who’s a bigger fan 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Franky said:

Wow !!! you must have bought the only 2 tickets they had

 

I tried to pick a less in demand date (Wednesday) and it has been refreshing for 1 hour 35 mins. But I guess at least there is life in them. Got standing too, didn't look like there were any sold out bits, maybe everyone will start getting through now? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Franky said:

Surely not!!!!!!

If you think in terms of - Single date vs Festival that you have to pre sign up for and don't know the line up for. They're already in favour in terms of 'when' people can go. 
Heaton Park and Wembley Stadium capacity will both be around 80k. 
5 Heaton dates, 5 Wembley dates. Thats 800k tickets. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, chazwwe said:

If you think in terms of - Single date vs Festival that you have to pre sign up for and don't know the line up for. They're already in favour in terms of 'when' people can go. 
Heaton Park and Wembley Stadium capacity will both be around 80k. 
5 Heaton dates, 5 Wembley dates. Thats 800k tickets. 
 

Meh, Glastonbury is better than these mugs lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, neil_clarky said:

Got through for Wednesday Wembley tickets on ticketmaster and my card got rejected for regular standing and then a different card rejected for seats. Strangely enough the card magically worked for the 358 surge priced tickets

 


 

watching the people on reddit just discovering that dynamic pricing is a thing is incredible. 
 

im still shocked that theyre really gonna make these dates take this long and then add dates. If they could actually add the other dates it would make those queues not as bad and sell fast and you move traffic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely if you are See tickets, it would be less of a PR disaster to let ticketmaster take the full allocation and handle the Oasis sale exclusively, than seemingly have a tiny number of tickets and look comparatively inept as no one gets through on your site all morning and ends up having to resort to TM anyway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...