Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Oasis


Guest

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Calvin Klein said:

I can assure you the amount of people from abroad that are already planning to go is insane. It'll be a nightmare to get tickets. 


Yeah, I’m mega nervous already about getting a ticket. Will try every possible route, Oasis have been my favourite band since I was 15 so I could never forgive myself if I didn’t go. I’d probably pay up to £750 for a ticket 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, foals98 said:

Has there been any news flow on the monkeys stuff recently? I remember reading your posts about it which influenced me to nab a ticket for the last Dublin gig. Are they done for good pretty much? 

 

That's what I was told, and I say that as a Monkeys obsessive.

 

I had to move heaven & earth to make that Dublin gig happen. I also have a horror story from it, but that's not for today.

 

I was told a month before that they're on an 'indefinite hiatus', effectively done. Alex would be doing solo + likely TLSP 3 at some point; I suspect solo to come first.

 

I really hope that one is wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hodgey123 said:


Yeah, I’m mega nervous already about getting a ticket. Will try every possible route, Oasis have been my favourite band since I was 15 so I could never forgive myself if I didn’t go. I’d probably pay up to £750 for a ticket 

If you're flexible on dates, I think you'll be fine. There's enough of them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd imagine tickets will be difficult. I saw them in 2008 for £30, probably going to cost about 5x that this time around if not more.

 

Can Noel & Liam stay on good terms for 20+ nights of shows? If we are to be believe that the relationship has been as bad as it's made out to be then that is surely a concern, although I guess for ~£50 million each they will do their best

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Calvin Klein said:

I can assure you the amount of people from abroad that are already planning to go is insane. It'll be a nightmare to get tickets. 

it will be a nightmare. But nothing can be worse than taylor swfit in my humble opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, hodgey123 said:


Yeah, I’m mega nervous already about getting a ticket. Will try every possible route, Oasis have been my favourite band since I was 15 so I could never forgive myself if I didn’t go. I’d probably pay up to £750 for a ticket 


I'll have to see. It's way too much money for me to make the trip. And I've already seen them 4 times although never in their homeland. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, mufcok said:

 

That's what I was told, and I say that as a Monkeys obsessive.

 

I had to move heaven & earth to make that Dublin gig happen. I also have a horror story from it, but that's not for today.

 

I was told a month before that they're on an 'indefinite hiatus', effectively done. Alex would be doing solo + likely TLSP 3 at some point; I suspect solo to come first.

 

I really hope that one is wrong.

I was probably one of the people giving you sh*t for this at the time, not sure. I really hope that isn't true. I don't really get why would they would stop to be honest. How much different could an Alex solo thing really be from their last 2 albums? And they're obviously all great friends. Long hiatus maybe but done for good i really don't think so 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, fraybentos1 said:

I was probably one of the people giving you sh*t for this at the time, not sure. I really hope that isn't true. I don't really get why would they would stop to be honest. How much different could an Alex solo thing really be from their last 2 albums? And they're obviously all great friends. Long hiatus maybe but done for good i really don't think so 

 

Yeah that I don't know. I was told at the time they hadn't been getting on, but that's not forced to be as friends; could just be musical differences.

 

Anyway, back to Oasis!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, sildante said:

You're right that it's not a dead cert, it depends how much of a one-off the reunion shows are, however I don't believe there is any way that Emily / the GF team would not want Oasis headlining if presented with the chance of it, regardless of how many shows they are playing or a dud set 20 years ago - great relationship with the festival, massively wide appeal, one of the most iconic British bands of all time. Would be the biggest headliner they have had in years/ever due to the anticipation, the only concern might be whether the field is big enough as it would be the biggest crowd the Pyramid stage has seen. 

If there’s any chance of Oasis playing Glastonbury Emily will be doing everything she can to make it happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, briddj said:

People who think Oasis won't sell these dates out as quickly as they can possibly be sold are being very naive.

 

This is going to be way worse that Glastonbury T day in demand. Global demand.

Without a shadow of doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, briddj said:

People who think Oasis won't sell these dates out as quickly as they can possibly be sold are being very naive.

 

This is going to be way worse that Glastonbury T day in demand. Global demand.

similar to eras tour you'd imagine but way more UK focused of course. Huge demand but they're clearly playing a load of dates

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, briddj said:

People who think Oasis won't sell these dates out as quickly as they can possibly be sold are being very naive.

 

This is going to be way worse that Glastonbury T day in demand. Global demand.

i don't think it will be worse than glasto because you can always buy from a friend after. If you miss the sale you can grab from resellers or from a friend that gave up. Glasto is way harder so when you don't get you just don't get it.

I'm truly afraid about the glasto sales - it will be worse than usual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, douglasmanso said:

it will be a nightmare. But nothing can be worse than taylor swfit in my humble opinion. 

I guess the edge they may have over Taylor is their fanbase will typically skew slightly older so may have more disposable income to splash in tickets. But yeah hope Ticketmaster has beefed up the servers 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, MEGABOWL said:

If there’s any chance of Oasis playing Glastonbury Emily will be doing everything she can to make it happen.

She might want to see them live 1st to see if they're actually any good given their last gig at the farm has gone down in history very badly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MrHew said:

She might want to see them live 1st to see if they're actually any good given their last gig at the farm has gone down in history very badly 

i think that nobody cares abou their last glasto gig 20 years ago... people wants to see it and BBC wants to broadcast. It's a no brainer for Emily. Actually its no brainer for every event producer/festival in the world. Is "the headliner that was promised" hahaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...