Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

I was bought up listening to Neil Young and was lucky enough to see him with my Dad when I was 15 at Sheffield arena in 2001. I couldn't believe my luck when he was announced for Glastonbury 2009. 

Really hoping he's confirmed again but do understand the lack of appeal for some of the younger Glastonbury goers but also isn't Glastonbury all about listening to new music and going to see things you wouldn't normally see.

 

If Neil is announced then there will be plenty of time for those unaware of his work to do some listening and get really excited ahead of seeing a proper legend. 

 

After 30+years of listening to the Weld live album I know I will never get bored of it. I believe the eclectic breadth of his music is pretty unrivalled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neil young is a headliner of any festival he plays - that's a fact. 

If Neil Young plays Glastonbury next year he headlines  -  that's a fact

 

I would not dispute either of the above, 

 

However, whilst appreciating his status as an artist and in stating I am quite a fan myself. He is a bit Niche

 

Fans of his will flock in their droves to see him and defend his back catalogue ( and rightly so as its full of beautiful songs) but outside of his fanbase I am not sure most people would be able to name 1 song by him and certainly not a handful of songs. I think other than Ring of Fire Johnny Cash falls in to the same bracket. 

 

That's the difference between Neil Young and many of the other artists mentioned above (Stevie, Bowie, Elton etc). 

 

It doesn't make NY less worthy of headlining, nor does it mean he's any less of an artist or performer, it simply means that (rightly or wrongly) his songs are not as universally well known. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100 Greatest Artists of All Time (Rolling Stone 2012). There’s only about 5 ahead of Neil still potentially available, and maybe Smokey R will be there too!:

1. The Beatles
2. Bob Dylan
3. Elvis Presley
4. Rolling Stones
5. Chuck Berry
6. Jimi Hendrix
7. James Brown
8. Little Richard
9. Aretha Franklin
10. Ray Charles
11. Bob Marley
12. The Beach Boys
13. Buddy Holly
14. Led Zeppelin
15. Stevie Wonder
16. Sam Cooke
17. Muddy Waters
18. Marvin Gaye
19. The Velvet Underground
20. Bo Diddley
21. Otis Redding
22. U2
23. Bruce Springsteen
24. Jerry Lee Lewis
25. Fats Domino
26. The Ramones
27. Nirvana
28. Prince
29. The Who
30. The Clash
31. Johnny Cash
32. Smokey Robinson & The Miracles
33. The Everly Brothers
34. Neil Young
35. Michael Jackson
36. Madonna
37. Roy Orbison
38. John Lennon
39. David Bowie
40. Simon and Garfunkel
 

Edited by Avalon_Fields
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Avalon_Fields said:

100 Greatest Artists of All Time (Rolling Stone 2012). There’s only about 5 ahead of Neil still potentially available, and maybe Smokey R will be there too!:

1. The Beatles
2. Bob Dylan
3. Elvis Presley
4. Rolling Stones
5. Chuck Berry
6. Jimi Hendrix
7. James Brown
8. Little Richard
9. Aretha Franklin
10. Ray Charles
11. Bob Marley
12. The Beach Boys
13. Buddy Holly
14. Led Zeppelin
15. Stevie Wonder
16. Sam Cooke
17. Muddy Waters
18. Marvin Gaye
19. The Velvet Underground
20. Bo Diddley
21. Otis Redding
22. U2
23. Bruce Springsteen
24. Jerry Lee Lewis
25. Fats Domino
26. The Ramones
27. Nirvana
28. Prince
29. The Who
30. The Clash
31. Johnny Cash
32. Smokey Robinson & The Miracles
33. The Everly Brothers
34. Neil Young
35. Michael Jackson
36. Madonna
37. Roy Orbison
38. John Lennon
39. David Bowie
40. Simon and Garfunkel
 

There are some wild shouts on that list. Lennon's solo work at 38 ahead of Bowie?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

Elsewhere, Banks wants a million from Healy.

 

 


I’ve no idea why presumably highly skilled and experienced attorneys write things like “I am legal counsel to superstar Azealia Banks”. It comes off as so sycophantic to their client, and the tone instantly gives the impression of delegitimising their position. Almost as if the letter is being dictated by them directly. Like when Trump’s physician’s report claimed he was in “perfect health”.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

If someone is big enough to headline the G and I'm not really familiar with their music I would usually assume that that's a skill issue on my side and boot up Spotify.


100%. Doesn’t mean I’m going to personally enjoy them or be pleased with their headline position, but at least I’ll have more appreciation.

 

I wasn’t that familiar with Neil Young, for example. I’ve enjoyed what I’ve heard so far. Took the advice to start with Everybody Knows This Is Nowhere, and moved on to Harvest. Can’t say I’ll be in his crowd (depends on clashes) but I’m sure he’ll entertain everyone who’s there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Avalon_Fields said:

Yes, that was the clear anomaly for me, I’m sure a British list would have Bowie much higher. 

If it's the NME or The Guardian that write that, Bowie comes top. That's a 2012 list though too - imagine he'd rank higher now, having since stuck out two acclaimed albums and passed on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Avalon_Fields said:

Ohio (Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young, written by Neil), a massively important political song written about the police killing 4 in a Vietnam war protest, easily one of the most influential songs of that era and I’m guessing every American would have known of the song. 

You just proved my point there tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Avalon_Fields said:

Ohio (Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young, written by Neil), a massively important political song written about the police killing 4 in a Vietnam war protest, easily one of the most influential songs of that era and I’m guessing every American would have known of the song. 

Festivals in the UK though - point doesn't really hold up!

 

Bad Bunny is a headliner in the US but not over here etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bold statement:

 

Other than dedicated fans of the individual artists, your average festival goer could not name 5 songs by any of Olivia, The 1975, or Neil Young. Further to that, they could not name 5 songs between them.

 

I really don't know what naming songs has to do with whether an act could or should headline Glastonbury or not.

 

Most attendees couldn't name 5 Cure songs, 5 Springsteen songs, 5 Radiohead songs, 5 Kendrick Lamar songs, 5 Billie Eilish songs or 1 SZA song - the list goes on. It doesn't matter.

 

He is who he is, and he has the status he has. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...