Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Be surprised if he's back on the road doing mega-gigs quite so soon.  More like 2026.

 

8 minutes ago, FloopFiller said:

Yeah I doubt he’s in any rush to get a new album out given he could take as long as he wants and people will be waiting, so ‘26 seems more realistic. 

Maybe, but so far there's been a 2.5 year gap between each of his solo releases, which would mean a new album late this year/early next if he carries on at the same rate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, charlierc said:

Though the question is if his tour bookers think there's more value in just doing his own dates.

a much better payday for everyone!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Aromaticmusic1 said:

Could he possibly do it next year? I think that would be really good then if maybe like Harry, Rihanna, fender 

Feels a bit too "current" for lack of a better word.. I know Rihanna's been around a while but you sort of feel they'd look to balance with an older act like in recent years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2024: Dua Lipa / Coldplay / Stevie Wonder
2025: The 1975 / Rihanna / Billy Joel
2026: Sam Fender / Harry Styles / ???

Struggling to hit on an obvious "heritage" headliner. Like, at what point do you qualify for a heritage headliner slot? Ten years after your last hit record, but when you're still pulling crowds to arenas and stadiums on name recognition?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, JRhys29 said:

Feels a bit too "current" for lack of a better word.. I know Rihanna's been around a while but you sort of feel they'd look to balance with an older act like in recent years.

While I kind of agree..   a quick check tells me Rihanna is now 19 years from her debut single...

Umbrella cane out in 2007!!!!! :0 

So probably is now in the older act category, which is slightly terrifying

I think the pool of older acts is dwindling a bit these days. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

2024: Dua Lipa / Coldplay / Stevie Wonder
2025: The 1975 / Rihanna / Billy Joel
2026: Sam Fender / Harry Styles / ???

Struggling to hit on an obvious "heritage" headliner. Like, at what point do you qualify for a heritage headliner slot? Ten years after your last hit record, but when you're still pulling crowds to arenas and stadiums on name recognition?

I thought the 1975 were f**king off for a year or two

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gfa said:

I thought the 1975 were f**king off for a year or two

they are - https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/the-1975-matty-healy-hiatus-clarification-break-up-1234835154/

" Matty Healy told an audience in Sacramento that an “indefinite hiatus of shows” has been planned following the run of concerts. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, charlierc said:

I think if you play 2 shows at Wembley Stadium one year then come back and play another 4, you're probably at Pyramid Stage level already.

Though the question is if his tour bookers think there's more value in just doing his own dates.

 

8 hours ago, Neil said:

a much better payday for everyone!

It's not all about the payday... a young Brit from Worcestershire turned into a worldwide star will be more than aware of the cultural significance of Glastonbury and playing the pyramid probably formed part of his wildest dreams when he was an unknown auditioning for X Factor. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aye, I assume The 1975 come back summer 2025. Wouldn't be surprised if it's a string of festival dates to start too - and that could well be Glastonbury. 

1 hour ago, SomeoneListeningIn said:

Even if The 1975 are about, they're not gonna be picked over Sam Fender or Dave next year.

Reckon the prospects of the three are interchangable. Honestly depends when they are touring respectively.

1 hour ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Unless the Dave in a non headline slot rumours this year have some substance to them...

Such a fascinating rumour, but one I am keen to see whether there is truth to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, stuie said:

 

It's not all about the payday... a young Brit from Worcestershire turned into a worldwide star will be more than aware of the cultural significance of Glastonbury and playing the pyramid probably formed part of his wildest dreams when he was an unknown auditioning for X Factor. 

 

There was an article the other day speculating on why big names in touring music are sacking off festivals in America to do their own shows and I guess it tied into that. But then equally knowing the cultural significance of Glastonbury as a show plus the broadcast opportunity of having your set as a full TV broadcast are both big selling points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

Reckon the prospects of the three are interchangable. Honestly depends when they are touring respectively.

I'm sure all three would make themselves available if they got the call. I just can't see The 1975 getting the call before Dave or Fender, especially after Healy has somewhat tarnished his public image over the past year or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, SomeoneListeningIn said:

I'm sure all three would make themselves available if they got the call. I just can't see The 1975 getting the call before Dave or Fender, especially after Healy has somewhat tarnished his public image over the past year or so.

Yeah, I think that's the thing for me too. There's possibly an element of wishful thinking on my part - think, squarely, The 1975 are the best live act of the three, having caught them all over the past few years.

But yeah. They're probably third of the three on the pecking order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

Aye, I assume The 1975 come back summer 2025. Wouldn't be surprised if it's a string of festival dates to start too - and that could well be Glastonbury. 

Reckon the prospects of the three are interchangable. Honestly depends when they are touring respectively.

Such a fascinating rumour, but one I am keen to see whether there is truth to.

I imagine we'll see a new Sam Fender album this summer or back half of the year. From there it could be a pre-Christmas / early 2025 Glasto announcement, with a string of stadium / outdoor shows around the same time. Maybe not quite the mega stadia but similar sizes and locations to what Arctic Monkeys did last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, JRhys29 said:

I imagine we'll see a new Sam Fender album this summer or back half of the year. From there it could be a pre-Christmas / early 2025 Glasto announcement, with a string of stadium / outdoor shows around the same time. Maybe not quite the mega stadia but similar sizes and locations to what Arctic Monkeys did last year.

Could Fender do a stadium run of that size? (The provincial football club run, as my mate called it after The Killers did similar grounds.)

I'd expect him to run a string of arena dates off the bat to help gauge demand. Could see them in the autumn - the usual four or five, in London, Manchester, Glasgow, Birmingham and Cardiff - followed by an announcement for stadium shows in 2025.

We've not got any major sporting events here in 2025, have we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hugh Jass II said:

If The 1975 were going to headline Glastonbury they would have by now.

We can consign them to the "almost got there but never quite did" bin alongside Foals and Biffy.

The difference with them is that they are still at their peak of popularity in comparison to the other two

Edited by Sam Y
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Aromaticmusic1 said:

Could he possibly do it next year? I think that would be really good then if maybe like Harry, Rihanna, fender 

I wouldn’t be in anyway surprised if that was the 3. With Styles (and Rihanna actually) it’s simply a case of if they want to. I’m sure the festival would book them in a heartbeat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hugh Jass II said:

We can consign them to the "almost got there but never quite did" bin alongside Foals and Biffy.

Biffy, I get on this, but don't think Foals were ever at that level, surely? They never even got to The O2. (Granted, selling out double nights at Alexandra Palace makes the same, but still a glaring omission.)

Edited by NorthernSoul52
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...