Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, DeanoL said:

What jobs won't be viable by October if all restrictions are lifted at that point and everyone has been jabbed?

I'm not saying it won't be viable by October per se, but I think the theatre industry could well take a long time to get properly going again. Not so much in the West End, where the big, long-running musicals should be able to up and start again as soon as they're able, but smaller and regional theatres are reliant on touring shows, which take a lot of organisation, logistics, pre-planning etc. which are far harder/less likely to have been undertaken during the last year or so, especially with almost no certainty around an end date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, zahidf said:

Usual tabloid leaks. with the thrilling prospect (according to The Sun) of being able at some point next March to visit the three remaining clothes retailers, so as to buy a lovely new outfit to sit in at home. Followed by meeting with one other household outside at Easter. I'm practically wetting myself with excitement.

Meanwhile, apparently overnight stays are off until June (if we're lucky - the Government will probably stall and string the suffering out beyond that.) Pubs by September? Any interesting cultural event April 2022?

and let's have ebery single child back in school and licking each others faces. What could go wrong?

Really does sum up what is likely to be a very disappointing announcement for a lot of us. Meeting one household outside when it’s still constantly raining. Great!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, hodgey123 said:

Really does sum up what is likely to be a very disappointing announcement for a lot of us. Meeting one household outside when it’s still constantly raining. Great!

I agree with this. Being too cautious now. It's ridiculous 

All sense of "not one second longer than necessary" has melted away to "well probably just keep doing something like that for a while becuase it'll help". 

After the over 50s are done, the negatives of lockdown outweigh the positives IMO. We should be looking to reopen a lot faster.

Edited by zahidf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, hodgey123 said:

Really does sum up what is likely to be a very disappointing announcement for a lot of us. Meeting one household outside when it’s still constantly raining. Great!

Is it possible they’re underplaying the plans in all these leaks?
Spaffer likes nothing more than being popular and to show up on Monday with better news than most are expecting would put a spring in his step - and a bounce in the polls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, waltere said:

I'm not saying it won't be viable by October per se, but I think the theatre industry could well take a long time to get properly going again. Not so much in the West End, where the big, long-running musicals should be able to up and start again as soon as they're able, but smaller and regional theatres are reliant on touring shows, which take a lot of organisation, logistics, pre-planning etc. which are far harder/less likely to have been undertaken during the last year or so, especially with almost no certainty around an end date.

There’s some truth in that but equally there will be summer to start getting stuff together, plus all the cancelled shows from last year that are ready to go, plus you have stand-ups, smaller bands and smaller 1/2 person plays that don’t need that level of production, all competing for slots. Almost every comic I know has written a new show in lockdown and wants to go tour it. 
Actually think the west end may struggle more as it relies so much on completely selling out shows and does that with lots of foreign tourism and people on business trips, which won’t be happening half as much now people are seeing it’s not necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ryan1984 said:

Is it possible they’re underplaying the plans in all these leaks?
Spaffer likes nothing more than being popular and to show up on Monday with better news than most are expecting would put a spring in his step - and a bounce in the polls.

Think that is quite optimistic but let’s hope. Would be strange to actively brief newspapers with different information all week though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

So, govt not going to make a final decision before Monday and until they have got all the data, meanwhile briefing their newpaper mates all week.

Well, they're not making any final decisions apart from the very first relaxations. That's why it looks like they're doing it right this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Ryan1984 said:

Is it possible they’re underplaying the plans in all these leaks?
Spaffer likes nothing more than being popular and to show up on Monday with better news than most are expecting would put a spring in his step - and a bounce in the polls.

I don’t think so, as we get closer to Monday the leaks will become more like the real thing. The leaks are increasingly showing a cautious approach which is the right one, we want to make sure we stay out of lockdown once we come out of it and never have to go back into one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Of course, following the data means that if hospitalisations fall off a cliff by the end of March, then we can probably open up more quickly. If not, it could take as long as some of the more pessimistic scenarios. We won't do anything "just in case". We hopefully will follow the data.

It will probably be a mixture of different data points not just cases for example. I can’t see them publishing a roadmap and speeding it up just because of the risks that would involve politically. But if they set out a firm schedule then people can start to plan and have some things to look forward to. If these leaks are true then the government are taking the right approach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that leak is true then we’re going to be in tier 4 (minus outdoor sport) in April even with all over 50’s offered a vaccine?! Diabolical. 
 

Do the government not realise that this will lead to a lot of people saying “fuck this” and to start meeting their family and friends anyway, potentially indoors. They need to be reasonable and give people covid secure places to meet up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea that it will be a criminal offense to visit my partner even beyond the date when it looks like all over-40's will be vaccinated is a genuine disgrace. If they truly want to keep it to outdoor mixing for the time being could they not at least let non-cohabiting couples form support bubbles?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

There’s some truth in that but equally there will be summer to start getting stuff together, plus all the cancelled shows from last year that are ready to go, plus you have stand-ups, smaller bands and smaller 1/2 person plays that don’t need that level of production, all competing for slots. Almost every comic I know has written a new show in lockdown and wants to go tour it. 
Actually think the west end may struggle more as it relies so much on completely selling out shows and does that with lots of foreign tourism and people on business trips, which won’t be happening half as much now people are seeing it’s not necessary.

Yeah these are all valid points. I may be being slightly skewed by the fact that the manager of where I work (large 'traditional' theatre in London but not West End) said in his latest e-mail to staff that even if things reopen then the calendar for the rest of the year is still currently empty. Also I mentioned the West End more for the fact that the technical setups etc. are still, presumably, in situations and ready to go, rather than the financial aspect of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, waltere said:

Yeah these are all valid points. I may be being slightly skewed by the fact that the manager of where I work (large 'traditional' theatre in London but not West End) said in his latest e-mail to staff that even if things reopen then the calendar for the rest of the year is still currently empty. Also I mentioned the West End more for the fact that the technical setups etc. are still, presumably, in situations and ready to go, rather than the financial aspect of it.

I wonder if a lot of theatres will go slowly at first but then all out for panto season. A risky approach...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ryan1984 said:

I wonder if a lot of theatres will go slowly at first but then all out for panto season. A risky approach...

Oh no it’s not!!

 

 

(You gave me literally no choice).

Edited by Mellotr0n
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, xxialac said:

*THIS* is the key to controlled mass events like festivals re-opening.

For festivals it's perfect.

The cost of the event is already high so the extra test cost can be built into the pricing model.

It's quick.

It's reliable.

Some festivals in 2021 should now go ahead.

Think the issue for something like this is the accuracy. Say you got Glastonbury tickets and you get to the festival and they deny you. That would be worse than not getting a ticket. At that point, Glastonbury are out of pocket, you're out of pocket. 

 

I personally think that once everyone is 2 jabbed up we should need them but for the interim its fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...