Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, lobo said:

For beck i was surrounded by people angrily waiting for Coldplay in silence.  

Coldplay fans impatiently and pointedly tapping their inert readytoflash wristbands.

TBH I can't imagine Coldplay fans getting angry. I assumed they're all a bit Stepford Wivesish.

3 minutes ago, SwedgeAntilles said:

 

So what you're saying is Radiohead are back to headline again this year?

Yes. Subbing the Strokes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Woffy said:

Coldplay fans impatiently and pointedly tapping their inert readytoflash wristbands.

TBH I can't imagine Coldplay fans getting angry. I assumed they're all a bit Stepford Wivesish.

Yes. Subbing the Strokes.

Ah, it's 2002 and everything's right with the world

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Woffy said:

Coldplay fans impatiently and pointedly tapping their inert readytoflash wristbands.

TBH I can't imagine Coldplay fans getting angry. I assumed they're all a bit Stepford Wivesish.

Hahaha. Yeah, nobody complained actually. Lots of huffing and looking at watches. I think one person said ‘I am looking forward to Coldplay. I think they will be good. I hope they arrive on stage on time but don’t stay on too late as I’m going to bed after this’.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Sorry if this is annoying but can someone take the time out and reply to me with the actual evidence that Nick Grimshaw said the Stroked

all I’ve seen is people saying they’d heard him mention it on the radio

He said it 2 days in a row, the one I heard is on this below (the 2nd of the two days he said it I think). He says it very early on so you shouldn't have to listen too long

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0001y6n 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

I actually think I could have a chance in the re sale.

Same.

Not really fussed about any of these rumoured headliners. Unless they get Madonna, which I doubt.

In fact I'd much rather they followed Coachella's lead and gave Tame Impala a bump up over a washed up Strokes. they were excellent in the sub slot in 2016 and have a new record coming which is out before the summer supposedly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Woffy said:

Upvoted for listening to Radio 1 two days on the bounce.

Hahaha no no I can't take that credit. I only listened the 2nd day and that was on iPlayer. Someone else mentioned it on here which led me to listen back as I'm in the minority who would absolutely love to see The Strokes there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mufcok said:

Hahaha no no I can't take that credit. I only listened the 2nd day and that was on iPlayer. Someone else mentioned it on here which led me to listen back as I'm in the minority who would absolutely love to see The Strokes there

:)

FWIW, I prefer it how@Matt42 refers to them: 'The Stroked'.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ghostdancer1 said:

Radiohead won't play the Pyramid as the PA/speaker system isn't to their liking apparently.

For what it’s worth, for a while I actually believed that one lol.

 

Edited by Matt42
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Matt42 said:

“I have heard a hot rumour that the strokes are going to be performing at glastonbury”

did we just gloss over that? He didn’t mention headlining at all.

unless he mentioned it again on the other day

We connected that with some news someone got on here that they were headlining with The Cure and Stormzy and how low the odds are which have seemed back ages ago. If they play, they headline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Matt42 said:

“I have heard a hot rumour that the strokes are going to be performing at glastonbury”

did we just gloss over that? He didn’t mention headlining at all.

unless he mentioned it again on the other day

No that has been mentioned, Neil mentioned it again earlier as well when I asked if he thought they'd headline

The headline bit came from someone on here who heard (prior to Macca being ruled out) that it was Stormzy, The Strokes and The Cure from someone who works for a big promoter 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

“I have heard a hot rumour that the strokes are going to be performing at glastonbury”

did we just gloss over that? He didn’t mention headlining at all.

unless he mentioned it again on the other day

It's been mentioned multiple times that he didn't say headlining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

“I have heard a hot rumour that the strokes are going to be performing at glastonbury”

did we just gloss over that? He didn’t mention headlining at all.

unless he mentioned it again on the other day

As DandyB said (great username by the way, gonna whack SIAS on now!), I would be very shocked if Strokes agreed to play but not headline. They pretty much only do festivals now to get the cash in, i.e. Gov Ball. I don't think they'll be arsed otherwise, I'm sure they've been asked before but not to headline and they've turned it down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, woyski said:

As DandyB said (great username by the way, gonna whack SIAS on now!), I would be very shocked if Strokes agreed to play but not headline. They pretty much only do festivals now to get the cash in, i.e. Gov Ball. I don't think they'll be arsed otherwise, I'm sure they've been asked before but not to headline and they've turned it down.

Thank you. Have an up-vote xxx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

“I have heard a hot rumour that the strokes are going to be performing at glastonbury”

did we just gloss over that? He didn’t mention headlining at all.

unless he mentioned it again on the other day

People tried to say the same about The Cure. That the bassist’s (don’t start) daughter only said they were playing Glastonbury. They eventually saw sense though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...