Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Liam Gallagher


plaskins

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, Homer said:

Bestival get away with this a bit (Crystal Castles subbing the main stage/The Cure!).

The Cure aren't a punt :P 

37 minutes ago, Homer said:

If the three releases are anything to go by, I'm struggling as to why he's selling so well.

Its a shite album but sounds like Oasis, so that was always going to be safe bet for the success he wanted 

Edited by MattDavies__
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I quite like Liam and the album, but the confusing thing for me is how well this solo thing is doing compared to Beady Eye when the music is albeit a little better but very similar. 

Also don't quite understand the 'fans' who have to compare everything Liam and Noel do and seemingly feel they can only pick one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DMCJ2 said:

I quite like Liam and the album, but the confusing thing for me is how well this solo thing is doing compared to Beady Eye when the music is albeit a little better but very similar. 

Cos he’s always in the press being a man of the people, not afraid to speak his mind, one of us and the type of bloke you could share a pint with. Who knew this was so popular among Britons?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dentalplan said:

Cos he’s always in the press being a man of the people, not afraid to speak his mind, one of us and the type of bloke you could share a pint with. Who knew this was so popular among Britons?

How do you explain the Stone Roses then, who were being utterly ridiculed before their demise after Reading 20 odd years ago, only to resurrect and become a stadium selling band without actually doing anything during their hiatus.

Liams resurgence is pretty similar and goes to show that hype sells. similar thing happened with LCD soundsystem on a smaller scale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, eastynh said:

How do you explain the Stone Roses then, who were being utterly ridiculed before their demise after Reading 20 odd years ago, only to resurrect and become a stadium selling band without actually doing anything during their hiatus.

Liams resurgence is pretty similar and goes to show that hype sells. similar thing happened with LCD soundsystem on a smaller scale.

Are the pre-split Stone Roses meant to be Beady Eye in this scenario? Cos their reputation hasn’t been revised - they’re still reviled. Stone Roses are similar to Oasis in that, given enough time, they’re elusive to young fans and old ones forget about the bad years but I’m not sure that’s the same as Liam in this case unless people really wanna hear those Beady Eye anthems.

Anyway, I guess his personality is refreshing for Oasis fans who are past bored of Noel’s dad rock and U2-chumming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As dental mentions I think the sudden popularity is pretty much down to his personality. He's not really done anything outrageous for a while and in the last year or so he's been everywhere giving out entertaining sound bites, to the point where in some circles he's almost became some sort of national treasure. People seem to have really bought into it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a bit unfair on LCD who are very, very talented. Stone Roses at least used to be (three of them anyway). 

 

Liam really isn't at all - bar his incredibly distinctive voice, which I also think is also his achillies heel weirdly. It's SO distinctive that he just sounds repetitive (I suppose Oasis didn't help themselves on that front!). Like a quite a few people, I was done with it after two albums and all those b-sides. It doesn't  help  that he only seems to have one gear: hitting you over the head with it. I guess it's not for twatty, (6) music snobs like me, but the Kasabian-loving lads are mad fer it (generalisation alert!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has been away for 5 years. Whether people on here like him or not, he was an act that half generation of people wanted to see. 

I have work colleagues who are 20 ish who never saw Oasis. Never saw Liam, and this is their chance.

Popularity is often down to perception. He is a star. He attracts attention for doing fuck all. You either have that kind of pull or you don't.

Most people think his album is better than anticipated too.

Edited by FuzzyDunlop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, eastynh said:

How do you explain the Stone Roses then, who were being utterly ridiculed before their demise after Reading 20 odd years ago, only to resurrect and become a stadium selling band without actually doing anything during their hiatus.

Urban Outfitters, mainly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Homer said:

Struggling to think who would want him. V?

Reading would comfortably book him seeing how quick Finsbury went....he might have sold generally and including his arenas as quicker or quicker than Noel. And as much as his voice night not be there....you are paying for the original voice of Oasis, people did it time and time again for GNR with just Axl. 

15 hours ago, sisco said:

He’s certainly done the sensible thing by including at least 50% oasis songs.

Impressed with his new album tbf too

Yup.....just like Noel did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, thewayiam said:

Reading would comfortably book him seeing how quick Finsbury went....he might have sold generally and including his arenas as quicker or quicker than Noel. And as much as his voice night not be there....you are paying for the original voice of Oasis, people did it time and time again for GNR with just Axl. 

Yup.....just like Noel did.

Eh he subbed Reading this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, FloorFiller said:

Liam and BMTH subbing were made with the hindsight of them taking off massively, which paid off. Bugg and Macklemore were made with the assumption that their flash in the pan rises would continue onwards, which they did not. Bugg has somehow managed to stay far more popular than I thought he would though.

Bugg above Pixies.

Never forgive. Never forget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, kingcrawler said:

As dental mentions I think the sudden popularity is pretty much down to his personality. He's not really done anything outrageous for a while and in the last year or so he's been everywhere giving out entertaining sound bites, to the point where in some circles he's almost became some sort of national treasure. People seem to have really bought into it. 

Not much of a conspiracy here if you ask me. The album has a selection of songs on it which are far superior to anything Beady Eye did. He made a few high profile appearances this summer (including One Love on TV, R&L) which seemed quite successful.

The irony is, Liam's output has got better since Beady Eye split and if Noel's new single is anything to go by his is getting worse! Be interesting to see what his album is like. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, GlastoSimon said:

Not much of a conspiracy here if you ask me. The album has a selection of songs on it which are far superior to anything Beady Eye did. He made a few high profile appearances this summer (including One Love on TV, R&L) which seemed quite successful.

The irony is, Liam's output has got better since Beady Eye split and if Noel's new single is anything to go by his is getting worse! Be interesting to see what his album is like. 

Oh I wasn't trying to suggest there was any sort of conspiracy or anything like that, I'm a fan and I'm glad he's back making music. I just think the general perception of Liam has changed slightly this year, I think a lot of people now see him as someone they find quite funny and could sit down the pub with rather than an embarrassing, loutish singer who's always up to no good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly what has been said above, he’s been very clever with his PR, he’s a pretty funny guy (wether you are laughing with him or at him is a different question) I can’t scroll more than 5 cm on Facebook without seeing a video of him commenting on something. The album is actually pretty good, and last but not least he has ridden the Oasis nostalgia buy covering loads of their songs and gained lots of popularity that way. He’s been very clever with that too, he’s played different Oasis songs and hinted that he may play others too. People are going along to see him with the expectation he may play their favourite Oasis song.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

The album is actually pretty good, and last but not least he has ridden the Oasis nostalgia buy covering loads of their songs and gained lots of popularity that way. He’s been very clever with that too, he’s played different Oasis songs and hinted that he may play others too. People are going along to see him with the expectation he may play their favourite Oasis song.

He came across well in the Supersonic film too and has endeared himself to fans more by embracing Oasis while Noel is seemingly dismissive towards questions about Oasis or Liam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

Exactly what has been said above, he’s been very clever with his PR, he’s a pretty funny guy (wether you are laughing with him or at him is a different question) I can’t scroll more than 5 cm on Facebook without seeing a video of him commenting on something. The album is actually pretty good, and last but not least he has ridden the Oasis nostalgia buy covering loads of their songs and gained lots of popularity that way. He’s been very clever with that too, he’s played different Oasis songs and hinted that he may play others too. People are going along to see him with the expectation he may play their favourite Oasis song.

Yeah tbf I don't even like Oasis or Liam Gallagher but I went to see him at Glasto as there was nowt else on I wanted to see and he played my favourite Oasis song in Slide Away which was nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can put it anyway you want, at the end of the day he's calmed down a bit and has settled into being a gobby but ultimately likable guy who seems to be coming across as honest in interviews which resonates these days. I loved Oasis when I was younger, thought his new album was okay enough to listen through twice but his interviews have gotten a smile out of me so he's alroght in my books. As said above I think Supersonic was massive in getting people to come round again.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...