Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

TITP 2017


Fezzy_buzzer

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, foolee said:

So is it actually a fact this isn't going ahead next year or is it just an assumption? I've had some of my best times at T and think it's a cracking fest, although I've not been to the new site I like they've got the mixture of rock, pop, dance etc. If it goes ahead who are the rumours? 

It really shouldn't be hard to grab headliners for next year either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 357
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

On 11/9/2016 at 4:02 PM, eFestivals said:

You personally might go back, but how many of the same mates you used to go with also would? Surely you've all grown up and got grown up lives, where getting a pass off the missus for an expensive weekend at a festie isn't necessarily going to be top of everyone's list?

If T were to alter who it books to be more to your liking it still wouldn't be like it used to be, because the focus would still be towards satisfying today's youngsters rather than you. Anything else wouldn't make much sense as a long term thing.

The mates I used to go with drive past T to other festivals with me! I did 7 festivals this year. T was the first on the list in the past, now it doesn't make it at all. I'm probably not representative of the old crowd that used to go though, there are those that would never go back because they are either too old or just over that kind of weekend. All it would take for me would be a decent line up again, released early enough so that I hadn't booked other festivals for the summer. I don't want it to be the same as it used to be other than there has to be stuff I like. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 13/11/2016 at 8:54 AM, eFestivals said:

Scott phoned FR (anonymously) two weeks ago and asked because we were thinking the same, and person on phone went off and asked someone, and then came back and gave a definite yes.

While it's not beyond a promoter to keep its options open and so we might have got a reply based on that, I think it's probably going ahead.

Wonder why there's been no advertising for it. The website hasn't updated from last year, no early bird sale and their social media activity is almost non-existent  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
2 hours ago, hamishrankin said:

Wonder why there's been no advertising for it. The website hasn't updated from last year, no early bird sale and their social media activity is almost non-existent  

That's why Scott phoned. 

I'm guessing there's some 3rd party issues to be ironed out, and they're not inflaming what might be a sensitive situation by announcing something before those issues are dealt with.

Or alternatively, perhaps, they're reviewing aspects of the festival structure - the number of stages, perhaps - so don't want to announce anything which might later be changed.

Just about anything is possible, but what I do know is that a couple of weeks ago they were saying it's definitely going ahead. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

That's why Scott phoned. 

I'm guessing there's some 3rd party issues to be ironed out, and they're not inflaming what might be a sensitive situation by announcing something before those issues are dealt with.

Or alternatively, perhaps, they're reviewing aspects of the festival structure - the number of stages, perhaps - so don't want to announce anything which might later be changed.

Just about anything is possible, but what I do know is that a couple of weeks ago they were saying it's definitely going ahead. 

 

Maybe they've had a boot up the sack came to there senses and strathallan is in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

Possible.

I've no idea about other plans but saw what someone suggested on here. After this year I could see why they might want to give up on the camping side of things.

I think they're in a 3 year agreement with Strathallan.  I'd be fairly sure it'll go ahead there on the usual weekend in July, but what the future holds after that is anyone's guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DomDom1984 said:

Didn't this same "they've not been advertising!" stuff come up last year with the same doubts over the festival? I'm not exactly thinking there's anything to read into here.

Yeah but I think Stone Roses had already been announced by this time last year. Also, usually the twitter is fairly active chatting pish before any announcement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, dandandan95 said:

Yeah but I think Stone Roses had already been announced by this time last year. Also, usually the twitter is fairly active chatting pish before any announcement.

:lol: the twitter feed chatted pish on a daily basis. I used to cringe reading some of the shit. Written to sound like a right ned

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Colfaedee said:

Maybe I'm just being nostalgic for T's glory years but I just want them to bring back the Ceilidh tent which mysteriously disappeared,

was always rammed and always a great atmosphere.   maybe the kids just aren't into the Gay Gordons anymore!

Unless thats the name of the latest new tenner banger then no.

Edited by SilverLining
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sunday mail running a front page today suggesting the three day festival at Glasgow Green is being discussed and possibility of T taking year out at Strathallan.  For year out, I'd read finished.  Apologies in advance for printing a link to the rag below 

 

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/t-in-the-park-9294981

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Red Day said:

Sunday mail running a front page today suggesting the three day festival at Glasgow Green is being discussed and possibility of T taking year out at Strathallan.  For year out, I'd read finished.  Apologies in advance for printing a link to the rag below 

 

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/t-in-the-park-9294981

Looks like I was given the correction information! I found this out in August. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LOCHLAND5 said:

Looks like I was given the correction information! I found this out in August. 

Looks like it. Unless that horrid paper has been lurking on here and made the story from previous posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Red Day said:

If it's as described it could be a decent day or days out.  I'd suspect it would spell the end of T

It wouldn't surprise me after last year. They've booked themselves into a corner with the current set up and that corner is filled with bams. At least this might allow them to restart with something of a clean state. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SwedgeAntilles said:

It wouldn't surprise me after last year. They've booked themselves into a corner with the current set up and that corner is filled with bams. At least this might allow them to restart with something of a clean state. 

Nicely put.  The year out maybe isn't the worst idea to look at where they are and look at options for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...