Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

TITP 2017


Fezzy_buzzer

Recommended Posts

Know people who are just back from there first time at creamfields and the ones I've spoke to says everything about it puts titp to shame.

From the festival site to the stages to the sound.

Titp has just lost another 20+ camping ticket sales because of strathalan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 357
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Going by their show at Bellahouston (which did sell out in the end) and good showings at L/R I'd still say Biffy are safe as potential headliners. On that gig, was quite impressed with the setup at Bellahouston Park, general feeling between myself and friends was there was potential room for them to expand it to allow for an extra tent stage in the fields either side of the stage and make it a day long/weekend wide things to potentially replace T, maybe even having it there and another similar sized site somewhere else in the country to split potential crowds. Would mean sacrificing camping but that might not be the worst thing in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Shootenanny! said:

Went to both days of Summer Sessions and found it in many ways a more enjoyable experience than recent trips to TITP. Barring a real rebirth in the strength of T's lineups and a drop in the number of neds going I could see Summer Sessions becoming my new regular Scottish festival.

It's not a festival though, it's just an open field for the days it runs with a main stage.

Edited by thewayiam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 02/09/2016 at 7:53 PM, thewayiam said:

It's not a festival though, it's just an open field for the days it runs with a main stage.

True, realise I'm not comparing like for like, just mean that I could see Summer Sessions taking the place of TITP as my main Scottish outdoor music event if it continues with line ups like this year. I live in Glasgow so its very handy for me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Shootenanny! said:

True, realise I'm not comparing like for like, just mean that I could see Summer Sessions taking the place of TITP as my main Scottish outdoor music event if it continues with line ups like this year. I live in Glasgow so its very handy for me!

That's kind of what I could see if the lineups keep as strong as this year happening with Victorious over R&L, I haven't been to R&L for a few years but with that fest you are close enough to make a bit of a south coast trip out of it visiting Bournemouth, around Portsmouth, Southampton, Poole etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Kings of Leon are a good shout with the new album out next month, however they could do the summer sessions again instead. 

Catfish will be high up the card if they are back next year, will be headliners one day. 

I could see Foals easy headline on Friday night. 

I'd welcome and Eminem or Kanye headliner that would pull in big crowds.

Richard Ashcroft should be there! 

SHM would be big draw if they were to reform.

Black Sabbath would be nice addition before they finish for good.

God forbid but Bieber would also be a big headline draw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 06/09/2016 at 9:32 PM, CAMF111 said:

Green Day just announced their Europe tour... 3 English dates but no Scottish ones. Perhaps a shout for T

Yeah it's a good shout. They'll be around for BST as well so puts them in the area. I couldn't have seen it before RHCP were booked this year but yeah, it could be a goer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Matthew McNally said:

Kings of Leon are a good shout with the new album out next month, however they could do the summer sessions again instead. 

Catfish will be high up the card if they are back next year, will be headliners one day. 

I could see Foals easy headline on Friday night. 

I'd welcome and Eminem or Kanye headliner that would pull in big crowds.

Richard Ashcroft should be there! 

SHM would be big draw if they were to reform.

Black Sabbath would be nice addition before they finish for good.

God forbid but Bieber would also be a big headline draw.

I think as the above poster said that Green Day looks a lock for me, coming back after the trio album stint and everything I don't think they'll be so choosy where they play.

If SHM were to I think it's either TITP or Sessions as I can imagine Cream would go in hard for them being 20th Anniversary as well and it probably guarantees a sellout there.

KOL I think it's very much T or Sessions depending on where they are, kind of tempted to say Sessions just as I reckon V might poach them.

Ashcroft I think will sub main stage one day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dandandan95 said:

Could they afford that though? Surely must be struggling a bit with poor sales last 2 years

Do you mean the headline set or Biffy subbing?

Despite the bailouts I don't think T will be in a position where they're rummaging for change any time soon as long as Live Nation is behind them and yeah, I think they could manage that set of headliners in a normal year.

I doubt Biffy Clyro's people will be negotiating themselves out of festival slots that they need; I feel that after nobody wanting them this year they'll be happy to take sub slots and be priced accordingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dentalplan said:

Do you mean the headline set or Biffy subbing?

Despite the bailouts I don't think T will be in a position where they're rummaging for change any time soon as long as Live Nation is behind them and yeah, I think they could manage that set of headliners in a normal year.

I doubt Biffy Clyro's people will be negotiating themselves out of festival slots that they need; I feel that after nobody wanting them this year they'll be happy to take sub slots and be priced accordingly.

Yeah man I just assumed Daft Punk would be so expensive, and the Scottish factor I think would mean Biffy are still a headliner. Can defo see Greenday being there similar to RHCP from this year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dandandan95 said:

Yeah man I just assumed Daft Punk would be so expensive, and the Scottish factor I think would mean Biffy are still a headliner. Can defo see Greenday being there similar to RHCP from this year

I'm not convinced they'll be treated any better for being Scottish tbh  This year would have been a prime time to have them return but they were passed on and left in the wilderness until a spot opened up at R+L, and IIRC they were supposedly offered a sub slot the year they headlined R+L and then T only went back for them once they'd been broken in as headliners. Obviously festivals aren't in the business of shrinking the headliner pool and it's quite possible they'll be brought in to balance out a headline trio or something but I really wouldn't be surprised if they start stepping down the bill next year onwards.

Not sure what the Daft Punk deal is other than they asked for a lot off Coachella all those years back to build their stage setup and barely made a profit but went on to play a bunch of festivals to make that up. When they played Rock Ness and Wireless and stuff it won't have been breaking the bank back then. Not sure now but that's anyone's guess.

Edited by dentalplan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coldplay are in Ireland on T weekend and Cardiff a couple of days after, they seem a decent shout for the Sunday now.

edit: Just seen their Cardiff gig billed as a UK stadium exclusive which makes them playing festivals seem very likely.

Edited by kingcrawler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...