Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

TITP 2017


Fezzy_buzzer

Recommended Posts

Good points about melvin being asked to have overview. While the line up has deteriorated the move from balado appears to be the biggest disaster. Maybe reinventing in a city location, similar to Reading is something being considered. Rock day, edm day and general pop day maybe a decent idea. Glasgow Green has hosted festivals before with gig on the green, which was basically the spare day of the reading/Leeds festival 

Edited by Red Day
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 357
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Admin
21 minutes ago, Red Day said:

Good points about melvin being asked to have overview. While the line up has deteriorated the move from balado appears to be the biggest disaster. Maybe reinventing in a city location, similar to Reading is something being considered. Rock day, edm day and general pop day maybe a decent idea. Glasgow Green has hosted festivals before with gig on the green, which was basically the spare day of the reading/Leeds festival 

Glasgow Green was where T started, wasn't it...?

(I might be wrong).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hamishrankin said:

Taking away camping in my opinion would not help, the majority of young punters go along to get pissed in the campsite and the music comes as a nice addition, taking away camping would severely reduce the demand from the younger punters. 

You say that as if it's a bad thing. What you argue for is one of the main reason why T has gone to shit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Red Day said:

You say that as if it's a bad thing. What you argue for is one of the main reason why T has gone to shit

They'd lose out more moving it to a non camping festival at Glasgow Green than keep plugging away at the festival at Strath Castle. 

The numbers will have decreased in recent years but no where near as much as they would if it became a day festival. You seriously think younger people would come to a day festival and pay extortionate prices for booze in the site? They'd rather camp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, hamishrankin said:

They'd lose out more moving it to a non camping festival at Glasgow Green than keep plugging away at the festival at Strath Castle. 

The numbers will have decreased in recent years but no where near as much as they would if it became a day festival. You seriously think younger people would come to a day festival and pay extortionate prices for booze in the site? They'd rather camp

Strathallan is the problem that and Dj's playing the mainstage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
15 hours ago, hamishrankin said:

Taking away camping in my opinion would not help, the majority of young punters go along to get pissed in the campsite and the music comes as a nice addition, taking away camping would severely reduce the demand from the younger punters. 

From one angle you're definitely right.

But from another the campsite has got out of control to the extent of putting some off from attending, and an embedded culture of going nuts is hard to reverse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know if this has been discussed and already dismissed here but the only things that would make me attend TITP this year coming is Radiohead or Arcade Fire (already ruled out).

Anything on the radiohead front? Hoping they get announced for Pukkelpop which is easily the best large festival ive ever went to by far but really unlikely as at RW so holding out for T. 

Would prop up ticket sales but the army of 16-30 year old eckied bams which is T's target market apparently wouldn't really appreciate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
2 hours ago, devilman said:

Oh I don't know, about 5 years of decent music should do it. It worked the other way to get us here :)

You personally might go back, but how many of the same mates you used to go with also would? Surely you've all grown up and got grown up lives, where getting a pass off the missus for an expensive weekend at a festie isn't necessarily going to be top of everyone's list?

If T were to alter who it books to be more to your liking it still wouldn't be like it used to be, because the focus would still be towards satisfying today's youngsters rather than you. Anything else wouldn't make much sense as a long term thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, eFestivals said:

From one angle you're definitely right.

But from another the campsite has got out of control to the extent of putting some off from attending, and an embedded culture of going nuts is hard to reverse.

Think this is spot on. How many people didn't see the videos from the campsite this year.

I only walked through it but it was edgy by early afternoon. Not like it used to be.

If you can't reverse it then reinvent it. In fairness it's maybe not ALL T's fault. Different times although I agree with folk saying the musical direction hasn't helped.

Would be interesting to know what the % of ticket sales was for day tickets this year. With numbers way down on what they used to get its maybe just not worth the hassle.

Fingers crossed Wickerman is back next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think someone posted on here it was about 25-30,000 people per day this year. The DJ/Pop act direction I think was less to do with appealing to younger people and maybe more of a way to save money after the loss of sharing their line up with Oxygen in 2011 (its probably no coincidence that was their last great line up). I've probably said it before but maybe an idea would be to hold the festival a week later next year and share their bill with Longitude.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Went to T this year for my first festival and despite all the negative stuff said about it I didn't think it was as bad as what it's been made out to be,then again I only have a day at Leeds to compare it to but still didn't see a massive difference in the two!

This year I'm swaying towards Mad Cool in Madrid,Green Day and Foos are my 2 favourite bands of all time so both of them at the same festival is a god send.Not sure how this sets up either of those for T this year as I know both are pretty much a strong favourite to be a headliner...am I right in thinking Mad Cool could clash with T this year (Second week of July)?That's if T is even on this year...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/11/2016 at 10:23 AM, eFestivals said:

erm ... Festival Republic, not DF.

Management of the festival got transferred to FR for the last festival, presumably to use Melvin's experience to help lessen the issues with the site.

I'm guessing that Melvin is going to keep that oversight, tho whether it goes as far as booking policy I'm not entirely sure. His success at 'modernising' Reading/Leeds certainly looks like something T could use tho.

If they actually transferred the management of the festival over to FR they done so very discretely. I know Melvin Benn came on board last year as Executive Producer, but i think the festival is still ran by DF with Melvin Benn just working for them. Of course i could be wrong, but i couldn't find anything online to suggest that FR were in control of the festival now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
8 hours ago, MJ171717 said:

Went to T this year for my first festival and despite all the negative stuff said about it I didn't think it was as bad as what it's been made out to be,then again I only have a day at Leeds to compare it to but still didn't see a massive difference in the two!

there's a bit of a hate thing going on with T. ;)

It might not be perfect, but it's the biggest and best Scotland has. I think it's a shame some seem so determined to destroy it, and i'm not meaning the smash-it-up (or whatever) types that attend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eFestivals said:

there's a bit of a hate thing going on with T. ;)

It might not be perfect, but it's the biggest and best Scotland has. I think it's a shame some seem so determined to destroy it, and i'm not meaning the smash-it-up (or whatever) types that attend.

Have you attended T in the past couple of years? I don't really blame the booking policy i just blame the effect social media etc is taking on teens which is totally changing the attitude towards a decent party. its obviously good for them. just a cause of too much member berries for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eFestivals said:

there's a bit of a hate thing going on with T. ;)

It might not be perfect, but it's the biggest and best Scotland has. I think it's a shame some seem so determined to destroy it, and i'm not meaning the smash-it-up (or whatever) types that attend.

Neil, said it before but I don't think anyone has a hate or desire to see it fail.  People like me and devilman have been pretty regular attendees over the years and have stopped going.  Generally what we post is an explanation as to why we've stopped going.  For me, I'm not in their target age range and accept that, but if line up had some appeal I'd maybe go.

For me, the biggest mistake T have made is moving to the current location.  Just doesn't seem to work and the campsite now has a reputation that puts a lot of people off.  I stayed off site every year at T but that seems to be almost impossible now.  

In Scotland these days, it's seen as a weekend away on the piss for school leavers who would rather spend the weekend in the campsite than actually watch the music.  For me the bands on the line up are the important thing, whereas that doesn't seem to be the case with T now.

I have no desire to see it die, but honestly Geoff Ellis and his team are totally at fault for its demise.  They are the ones in charge of the strategy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mezhyp1 said:

If they actually transferred the management of the festival over to FR they done so very discretely. I know Melvin Benn came on board last year as Executive Producer, but i think the festival is still ran by DF with Melvin Benn just working for them. Of course i could be wrong, but i couldn't find anything online to suggest that FR were in control of the festival now.

 

It was FR production team that was involved right from the build, they also use APL Events as they have done for years. There was very little DF involvement in the production/site management side of things. Thimk DF mainly deal with the artist, booking and press related matters.
Might be wrong, but that's the impression I got, similar to Download last year where it has moved from LN management to FR management (even though they are in part the same company) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is it actually a fact this isn't going ahead next year or is it just an assumption? I've had some of my best times at T and think it's a cracking fest, although I've not been to the new site I like they've got the mixture of rock, pop, dance etc. If it goes ahead who are the rumours? 

Edited by foolee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
7 hours ago, foolee said:

So is it actually a fact this isn't going ahead next year or is it just an assumption? I've had some of my best times at T and think it's a cracking fest, although I've not been to the new site I like they've got the mixture of rock, pop, dance etc. If it goes ahead who are the rumours? 

Scott phoned FR (anonymously) two weeks ago and asked because we were thinking the same, and person on phone went off and asked someone, and then came back and gave a definite yes.

While it's not beyond a promoter to keep its options open and so we might have got a reply based on that, I think it's probably going ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...