Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

TITP 2017


Fezzy_buzzer

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 357
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

44 minutes ago, dentalplan said:

Certainly in with a shout but I'd expect it more so if Croke Park was on a Friday or something. They all seem to be a few days apart but with it being a festival show it might not be a concern.

Also has that been confirmed as T weekend? Can't find the info on that anywhere.

I just assumed it would be that weekend, not really any obvious reason to change it from being that weekend is there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, kingcrawler said:

I just assumed it would be that weekend, not really any obvious reason to change it from being that weekend is there?

Dunno - it's pretty fluid ain't it?

4 minutes ago, Muppetmark said:

Coldplay

Biffy x some dj 

Green day

You don't have to do this whenever a new headliner gets mentioned. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, dentalplan said:

Dunno - it's pretty fluid ain't it?

You don't have to do this whenever a new headliner gets mentioned. :P

Well yeah I guess but it's pretty much always the second weekend in July and two weeks after Glastonbury isn't it? Don't see why they'd change that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
21 hours ago, Muppetmark said:

drake has 6 dates in london but only 1 in scotland. Headliner?

There's more than 6 times the population within easy range of London than the central belt has within easy range - plus a bigger scene - so I reckon the proportions are about right without need for any further 'hidden' shows to be part of the thinking.

You could be right all the same, but the basis you've used to reach your conclusion doesn't really hold up.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I reckon Coldplay and Biffy will headline for sure, with the other one most likely being KOL but possibly Green Day. Which ever one doesn't play T will be at GSS. To be honest, that's 3 pretty strong headliners but it's the under card that will let the festival down. Calvin Harris will no doubt show up some where to play his 26th TITP on the trot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LSF said:

I reckon Coldplay and Biffy will headline for sure, with the other one most likely being KOL but possibly Green Day. Which ever one doesn't play T will be at GSS. To be honest, that's 3 pretty strong headliners but it's the under card that will let the festival down. Calvin Harris will no doubt show up some where to play his 26th TITP on the trot. 

I think KOL for GSS and GD for T as they are touring early year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thing is, Coldplay's dates all but rule out a load of countries with huge festivals so I don't see them playing T and not stuff like Werchter, Rock am Ring, etc.

Biffy were passed on this year so now their declining status has been confirmed, I'm not sure why they'd be rebooked now. Though T isn't as popular as a few years ago either so maybe a good fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dentalplan said:

Thing is, Coldplay's dates all but rule out a load of countries with huge festivals so I don't see them playing T and not stuff like Werchter, Rock am Ring, etc.

Biffy were passed on this year so now their declining status has been confirmed, I'm not sure why they'd be rebooked now. Though T isn't as popular as a few years ago either so maybe a good fit.

But why is Coldplay labeled as only ukstadium show of the year rather than gig.  I guess they could do an arena run but that's unlikely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Muppetmark said:

But why is Coldplay labeled as only ukstadium show of the year rather than gig.  I guess they could do an arena run but that's unlikely. 

it was probably just put there so people didn't wait around expecting Wembley or Etihad to be added at a later date and not really something worth reading far into,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't be sure that T didn't want Biffy for next year rather than this, with this year's headliners in mind.

As for Drake, he's doing four shows in London and one everywhere else. Not ruling him out, but I don't think the four shows in London thing is really much of a pointer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, standfree92 said:

Does anyone else think it might not go ahead? Just thinking about the low attendance this year might mean they cancel it this year. 

 

Was there any offical attendance figures?  

Might be a good thing taking a year out,taking a step back and getting there finger out there arses and find a knew site.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...