Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

TITP 2017


Fezzy_buzzer

Recommended Posts

  • Admin
16 hours ago, DomDom1984 said:

Fair point. Think they'd need strong headliners beside them. But they'd also pull that crowd. It's Queen and folk at festivals love a singalong. 

what they won't do particularly well is sell festival tickets to their own crowd - and a festival headliner that doesn't sell tickets is the wrong headline act.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 357
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Is T on next year ? I thought early birds would of been on sale by now ? Plus have they not usually named a headliner by now also ? sure the roses had been announced this time last year.................Was thinking of going for a day again ! Maybe the whispers i heard are true!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, LOCHLAND5 said:

Is T on next year ? I thought early birds would of been on sale by now ? Plus have they not usually named a headliner by now also ? sure the roses had been announced this time last year.................Was thinking of going for a day again ! Maybe the whispers i heard are true!

My personal feeling is that it will be off. Don't know what the official attendance was but they would of defiantly made a loss. If i was them i would rebrand the festival too much of a ned fest 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, standfree92 said:

My personal feeling is that it will be off. Don't know what the official attendance was but they would of defiantly made a loss. If i was them i would rebrand the festival too much of a ned fest 

I don't know, the fact that Radiohead have yet to announce a Scottish date next year makes me think they're about to be announced as the first headliner, although I'm not sure how that will go down with the usual T attendees.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, addicted2noise said:

I don't know, the fact that Radiohead have yet to announce a Scottish date next year makes me think they're about to be announced as the first headliner, although I'm not sure how that will go down with the usual T attendees.   

Yeah maybe they will do Glasgow summer sessions later on.  Was surprised they didn't play at the hydro as they didn't play in Scotland on their last tour.  I've got tickets for Manchester as i didn't want to miss out on seeing them live. I just don't think they would appeal to the T in the park attendee now. TITP really needs a coldplay/ foo fighters to help shift tickets.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, standfree92 said:

Yeah maybe they will do Glasgow summer sessions later on.  Was surprised they didn't play at the hydro as they didn't play in Scotland on their last tour.  I've got tickets for Manchester as i didn't want to miss out on seeing them live. I just don't think they would appeal to the T in the park attendee now. TITP really needs a coldplay/ foo fighters to help shift tickets.  

 

 

Yeah there's no way Radiohead will headline TITP these days -  if The Stone Roses pulled a shit crowd then Radiohead'a would be abysmal. Much more likely they're either playing elsewhere, or even that they just can't be arsed doing a full tour and are leaving it at this years London dates, Glastonbury and Manchester

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, standfree92 said:

My personal feeling is that it will be off. Don't know what the official attendance was but they would of defiantly made a loss. If i was them i would rebrand the festival too much of a ned fest 

The loses were huge apparently! I was told it's gone as a camping fest and likely to come back as a day/days event only .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greenday, Radiohead and Arcade Fire all available as well as all your usual fare. Trouble is that incompetence and fuckwittery have cultivated a small crowd of school leavers and neds that just want to fight and watch Calvin Harris. Money thrown after good bands would be just wasted now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, devilman said:

Greenday, Radiohead and Arcade Fire all available as well as all your usual fare. Trouble is that incompetence and fuckwittery have cultivated a small crowd of school leavers and neds that just want to fight and watch Calvin Harris. Money thrown after good bands would be just wasted now.

The bookings of late have followed a specific path with DJ's being the choice.  The move to Strathallen was poorly managed and basically the people who would pay to see the three bands mentioned have long since sailed.  I'd watch all 3 but wouldn't go back to T.  Sad because I used to love the weekend but over a period of a few years Geoff and his crew made it less and less attractive so I went elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, LOCHLAND5 said:

The loses were huge apparently! I was told it's gone as a camping fest and likely to come back as a day/days event only .

I've got this from a pretty good source, next year being the final year camping with the Strathallan contract before it moves to Glasgow Green.

Can't see a massive turnaround in success, the damage is done IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Louis1 said:

I've got this from a pretty good source, next year being the final year camping with the Strathallan contract before it moves to Glasgow Green.

Can't see a massive turnaround in success, the damage is done IMO

Ah would be happy with that

Easy to get to,plenty hotels something to do after 12.

Anythings better than strathallan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 06/11/2016 at 7:16 PM, LOCHLAND5 said:

The loses were huge apparently! I was told it's gone as a camping fest and likely to come back as a day/days event only .

 

48 minutes ago, Louis1 said:

I've got this from a pretty good source, next year being the final year camping with the Strathallan contract before it moves to Glasgow Green.

Can't see a massive turnaround in success, the damage is done IMO

Will be sad to see T finally roll over and die if any of this is true but this does all make sense in a rip it up and start again kind of way.

No camping hassle for the organisers and Glasgow Green coped ok with the Roses the other year.

Is it not the same folk that run the summer sessions though at Bellahouston ?

Would guess that the Polis and Council would be happier for them to continue out at Bella away from the city centre.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, comfortablynumb1910 said:

 

Will be sad to see T finally roll over and die if any of this is true but this does all make sense in a rip it up and start again kind of way.

No camping hassle for the organisers and Glasgow Green coped ok with the Roses the other year.

Is it not the same folk that run the summer sessions though at Bellahouston ?

Would guess that the Polis and Council would be happier for them to continue out at Bella away from the city centre.

 

It's sad because camping at balado was fantastic

Brilliant laugh from start till finish,strathallan has been a absalute nightmare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the one day events will be better suited as you can tailor a bill to the acts i.e you can have a rock day and then the bams can have all there EDM push on another. 

 

Still a shame that this has happened to Scotlands biggest festival. I wonder what DF concerts would do different now with TITP?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
44 minutes ago, standfree92 said:

Still a shame that this has happened to Scotlands biggest festival. I wonder what DF concerts would do different now with TITP?

erm ... Festival Republic, not DF.

Management of the festival got transferred to FR for the last festival, presumably to use Melvin's experience to help lessen the issues with the site.

I'm guessing that Melvin is going to keep that oversight, tho whether it goes as far as booking policy I'm not entirely sure. His success at 'modernising' Reading/Leeds certainly looks like something T could use tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...