Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2016


thewayiam

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 15.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Foo Fighters

Royal Blood

Disclosure

Muse

Taylor Swift

Ed Sheeran

Coldplay

[insert band here]

Nine Inch Nails

Muse won't play, they've already started their tour and Glasto wasn't involved so it won't be next year, that's how Glasto does things, they don't get acts on their 2nd year. Don't think Royal Blood will quite sub and I can't see Taylor doing it next year. Putting Biffy Clyro in is as good a chance as any, still think the Mac have a chance. Foo's have been around for a long time but they are still loved by a young demographic as well. FM would be the only one really aimed at the older generation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Muse won't play, they've already started their tour and Glasto wasn't involved so it won't be next year, that's how Glasto does things, they don't get acts on their 2nd year.

That's not even remotely true though, is it? Arcade Fire did it on the 2nd year of their tour, so did Mumford & Sons, and I'm certain there'll be other examples if you go further back, I've only checked the last 3 years.

I really don't understand why people think there's all these invisible rules about whether & when the Festival is willing to book specific acts - it might be that acts are less likely to play the Festival on the 2nd year of touring an album, but it's certainly not a policy decision from the Festival, that'll be something the artist decides.

Likewise with the fact that other acts may be headlining elsewhere - Glastonbury has never cared what other festivals are doing. If an act is ruled out of contention because they're headlining somewhere else, it's because that festival has insisted on exclusivity not because of any policy on the Glastonbury side.

Edited by incident
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Foo Fighters (making up for this year)

 

Radiohead (if new music appears by then, which it should)

 

Lady Gaga (Bit of an outside bet seeing her recent commercial mishaps, but a new album in the next year, and seems to slowly be regaining the media after her Jazz album with Tony Bennett so I think it could happen). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not even remotely true though, is it? Arcade Fire did it on the 2nd year of their tour, so did Mumford & Sons, and I'm certain there'll be other examples if you go further back, I've only checked the last 3 years.

I really don't understand why people think there's all these invisible rules about whether & when the Festival is willing to book specific acts - it might be that acts are less likely to play the Festival on the 2nd year of touring an album, but it's certainly not a policy decision from the Festival, that'll be something the artist decides.

Likewise with the fact that other acts may be headlining elsewhere - Glastonbury has never cared what other festivals are doing. If an act is ruled out of contention because they're headlining somewhere else, it's because that festival has insisted on exclusivity not because of any policy on the Glastonbury side.

You'll have to go a very long way back to find an act doing Glastonbury on their second Summer of touring festivals, which is what he meant.

It doesn't have to be some kind of rule/pattern, it just seems that Glastonbury doesn't want headliners who've brought the same show to different festivals the year before, because it makes it less special. I really doubt they'll book Muse next year, and will instead get acts who are bringing a new show to festivals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'll have to go a very long way back to find an act doing Glastonbury on their second Summer of touring festivals, which is what he meant.

No, you really don't have to go far back at all. Unless 2 years is a long way back. Mumford and Sons toured their new material throughout 2012 including at Rockness, released the new album in September, then headlined Glastonbury in 2013.

And again, it's absolutely not a decision on the Glastonbury side. It might seem that way because it definitely makes more sense from the artists perspective to do Glastonbury first time round - they get the exposure, the initial record sales, and bump up their prestige so the following year they can ask for more money from Reading/Leeds/IOW/whoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, you really don't have to go far back at all. Unless 2 years is a long way back. Mumford and Sons toured their new material throughout 2012 including at Rockness, released the new album in September, then headlined Glastonbury in 2013.

And again, it's absolutely not a decision on the Glastonbury side. It might seem that way because it definitely makes more sense from the artists perspective to do Glastonbury first time round - they get the exposure, the initial record sales, and bump up their prestige so the following year they can ask for more money from Reading/Leeds/IOW/whoever.

Meant to say the second Summer after bringing out an album. It never happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meant to say the second Summer after bringing out an album. It never happens.

The only time I can remember it happening was when U2 were booked in 2010, although that's obviously different to bands like Muse and Coldplay given they normally don't play festivals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meant to say the second Summer after bringing out an album. It never happens.

Right, so you need to keep adding caveats? Regardless of whether the album was on the shelves yet they were certainly touring it throughout European Summer Festivals, and playing large amounts of the new material every show.

I'm not saying it's not rare - I'm just saying that from the festivals side, precisely when an act last released an album isn't and has never been an obstacle to them headlining.

If you're seeing a pattern, it's for the reasons I said before, ie it makes much more sense from a promotional aspect to play the big pulicity but low fee gig first in order to boost awareness, record sales, ticket sale, and the asking price for other events to come.

Yes, to do Glastonbury on the 2nd year of touring an album doesn't happen as much as there's far less upside from the artists perspective - but certainly in the case of Muse which is the post I was responding to I don't think even that's an obstacle as there's a historic relationship / connection between the band and the festival. Same would apply for Coldplay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he was just trying to explain it how everyone else recognises it while you were trying to be stubborn about it.

I'm not sure what there is to recognise - by any standard they were touring Festivals promoting the album in Summer 2012?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mumfords played almost as many songs off Babel at Glastonbury 2011 as at Rockness 2012, so you could argue it was just a continuation of that tour rather than the start of the Babel tour. They seemed to tour pretty much constantly up until that point anyway bar a couple of 2-3 months gaps so it's not like they suddenly started touring in summer 2012 to promote Babel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what there is to recognise - by any standard they were touring Festivals promoting the album in Summer 2012?

 

the thinking is:

 

- release album in 2015

- play other UK festivals in 2015

- headline Glastonbury in 2016

 

isn't something that is likely to happen based on recent years.

 

 

how true it is, i don't know, but it's certainly been the way for many headliners recently.

personally i think it's a completely daft policy, if it actually is a policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'll have to go a very long way back to find an act doing Glastonbury on their second Summer of touring festivals, which is what he meant.

It doesn't have to be some kind of rule/pattern, it just seems that Glastonbury doesn't want headliners who've brought the same show to different festivals the year before, because it makes it less special. I really doubt they'll book Muse next year, and will instead get acts who are bringing a new show to festivals.

 

Pretty much.

 

No, you really don't have to go far back at all. Unless 2 years is a long way back. Mumford and Sons toured their new material throughout 2012 including at Rockness, released the new album in September, then headlined Glastonbury in 2013.

And again, it's absolutely not a decision on the Glastonbury side. It might seem that way because it definitely makes more sense from the artists perspective to do Glastonbury first time round - they get the exposure, the initial record sales, and bump up their prestige so the following year they can ask for more money from Reading/Leeds/IOW/whoever.

 

You can't compare a Rockness show to a Glastonbury show. Glastonbury 2013 was a bigger set and it was their time to headline, Glastonbury wouldn't have booked them in 2014 had they did somewhere else in 13.

 

I honestly can't think of anyone due to release a new album that is also due a headline spot... Only really Biffy Clyro. Maybe Iron Maiden?

I personally think Taylor Swift has done so much over the last year or two that she'll take a break next year.

I reckon we'll probably get 3 curveballs. Like, 2 first festival headline shows and 1 old-timer.

 

I think you'll get 2 first Glastonbury headline shows, possibly even 3. I don't see Taylor, very much the case of Muse in that respect, just probably wasn't ready for her this year.

 

I think one thing for certain is that is won't be Foo Fighters, maybe a couple of years down the line again, but not next year

 

I think it's closer to certain than not. If they are at Pinkpop and Werchter next year, it is ideal. Even more so as anyone that didn't get a Glasto ticket will have to pay for their own shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly can't think of anyone due to release a new album that is also due a headline spot... Only really Biffy Clyro. Maybe Iron Maiden?

I personally think Taylor Swift has done so much over the last year or two that she'll take a break next year.

I reckon we'll probably get 3 curveballs. Like, 2 first festival headline shows and 1 old-timer.

Coldplay and Rihanna. Those two, plus Biffy, are the only current acts I can see releasing albums and being possible headliners. Maybe Foals, but if they headline anywhere I think it'll be R&L.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mumfords played almost as many songs off Babel at Glastonbury 2011 as at Rockness 2012, so you could argue it was just a continuation of that tour rather than the start of the Babel tour. They seemed to tour pretty much constantly up until that point anyway bar a couple of 2-3 months gaps so it's not like they suddenly started touring in summer 2012 to promote Babel.

Fair enough, but, if Glastonbury have a policy whereby they don't want to book bands on the second summer after they've released an album, are they really going to be aware that Mumford were playing new songs off the album the year before, and be checking their setlists?

Also might not be about being the first festival to hear those songs, but being the first festival to have them after they've released a new album, got back into the limelight, amassed a load of new fans and got some excitement about them.

I'm not really sure how to explain it to justify it, but the reality is, you'll be going back a long way to find a headliner who did Glastonbury on their second Summer after releasing an album.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough, but, if Glastonbury have a policy whereby they don't want to book bands on the second summer after they've released an album, are they really going to be aware that Mumford were playing new songs off the album the year before, and be checking their setlists?

Also might not be about being the first festival to hear those songs, but being the first festival to have them after they've released a new album, got back into the limelight, amassed a load of new fans and got some excitement about them.

I'm not really sure how to explain it to justify it, but the reality is, you'll be going back a long way to find a headliner who did Glastonbury on their second Summer after releasing an album.

Will I was agreeing with you!

My point was that they didn't just start playing those songs in 2012 to promote Babel so those summer 2012 were not really for promoting loads of new material. So Glastonbury still got them on their first summer after releasing the album and their first summer properly touring the album.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will I was agreeing with you!

My point was that they didn't just start playing those songs in 2012 to promote Babel so those summer 2012 were not really for promoting loads of new material. So Glastonbury still got them on their first summer after releasing the album and their first summer properly touring the album.

Oh I misread haha. Thought you said Glastonbury 2013, not 2011!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really think people on here overestimate the popularity of Foals. I may be wrong, but I can't ever see them headlining the Pyramid unless they absolutely blow up in the next couple of years. I can see them subbing or third down maybe, or headlining the other stage, but that's probably their peak in my opinion.

 

I know chart success isn't the be all and end all, but Foals haven't had a number 1 album or single. The Pyramid tends to host legends or those with mass popularity. Even Arcade Fire have two number 1 albums, had headlined many other festivals around the world before Glastonbury, but by all accounts had a pretty small crowd for a headliner.

 

I'd like to see them, I like their music, but not at the top of the bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how true it is, i don't know, but it's certainly been the way for many headliners recently.

personally i think it's a completely daft policy, if it actually is a policy.

Yep, it would be a daft policy.. But I'm pretty certain it's not a policy, it just works out that way because it makes more sense for the band from a marketing etc perspective.

Here's what I was trying to get at last night, and explaining badly, in hopefully a more concise way -

There's very little chance that Glastonbury would turn down a viable headliner soley because of when their last album came out or what shows they played last year. If Muse want to play next year, and the Festival has a free slot for them, then Muse will likely be booked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's very little chance that Glastonbury would turn down a viable headliner soley because of when their last album came out or what shows they played last year. If Muse want to play next year, and the Festival has a free slot for them, then Muse will likely be booked.

 

You are still missing the point though that it's likely when a band plays Glastonbury off the back of a new album, they most likely want to do it that way. Bands will have a fair idea of how Glastonbury works/tries to work in this case as well and I doubt it's just co-incidence how it works out. Muse are touring early this year in Europe quite excessively, provided they do that arena tour in the UK early next year I'd imagine there is less chance than there already was that they'd be around doing festivals early year. Later on in the year however, where no European festivals are being done by them and the pay packets are around I'd say is a closer call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...