Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2013 Headliners


Guest shangri-la_steward

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 11.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Admin

Tax reasons? Full payment always conveniently falls the other side of April.

I maybe wrong and being very cynical.

you're right about the April sale (which is when the full sale always used to happen) is about the tax issues. But it's not quite how you're thinking.

The tickets get sold, but Glastonbury don't get the money from the ticket agent until after the Festival (that's the standard way of agents handling ticket money, in case it needs refunding) - but whether they have the money or not the VAT is due is in the tax quarter that the sales are made in. So by holding the ticket sale in April it means that Glastonbury don't have to borrow millions of pounds to pay the VAT bill (because the ticket money will be in their hands before payment is due).

I'm not sure how having the sale in October alters things, but I'm guessing (now that they only do deposits) that there's no VAT consequences from taking 'deposits' because they are not (in legal terms) a 'sale' from which VAT is due.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think arctics, stones and mumfords are our headliners guys. Personally I think Mumford leaves it on an underwhelming note. But they are very solid. I just hope we get some female bands/ solo undercards. It seems abit male dominant.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

you're right about the April sale (which is when the full sale always used to happen) is about the tax issues. But it's not quite how you're thinking.

The tickets get sold, but Glastonbury don't get the money from the ticket agent until after the Festival (that's the standard way of agents handling ticket money, in case it needs refunding) - but whether they have the money or not the VAT is due is in the tax quarter that the sales are made in. So by holding the ticket sale in April it means that Glastonbury don't have to borrow millions of pounds to pay the VAT bill (because the ticket money will be in their hands before payment is due).

I'm not sure how having the sale in October alters things, but I'm guessing (now that they only do deposits) that there's no VAT consequences from taking 'deposits' because they are not (in legal terms) a 'sale' from which VAT is due.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you're right about the April sale (which is when the full sale always used to happen) is about the tax issues. But it's not quite how you're thinking.

The tickets get sold, but Glastonbury don't get the money from the ticket agent until after the Festival (that's the standard way of agents handling ticket money, in case it needs refunding) - but whether they have the money or not the VAT is due is in the tax quarter that the sales are made in. So by holding the ticket sale in April it means that Glastonbury don't have to borrow millions of pounds to pay the VAT bill (because the ticket money will be in their hands before payment is due).

I'm not sure how having the sale in October alters things, but I'm guessing (now that they only do deposits) that there's no VAT consequences from taking 'deposits' because they are not (in legal terms) a 'sale' from which VAT is due.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I take it the acts don't get paid until after the festival then?

smaller acts do (or at least did) get paid in cash on the day.

For bigger bands, the norm is that a deposit is paid of half the fee a month before the show, and the other half just afterwards. I presume that Glasto work to this normal system, but don't know for sure.

What I do know is that Eavis has to take out a massive loan each year for the advance funding of the fest. Something that was recently reported somewhere said that he's borrowing £15M from a Dutch bank to fund this year's festival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Eavis must have been worrying in 2008 then!

he did - the effect on him was clearly visible, to the point of him looking unwell.

A few months after the fest he looked significantly better. So much so that when I met him then the first words that left my mouth (in some sort of auto-pilot way) were "you're looking well".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he did - the effect on him was clearly visible, to the point of him looking unwell.

A few months after the fest he looked significantly better. So much so that when I met him then the first words that left my mouth (in some sort of auto-pilot way) were "you're looking well".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suffering from headlineritus; CBA TBH :)

I think the only question left is whether the Mumfarts sub The Stones Sat and either Gaga/Prince/Madonna plays Sun, or (heaven forbid) Mumfarts actually headline Sun; that's my current interpretation, taking into account we're on P472 :)

Back to looking busy.............

Edited by oneeye
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Me too.  Reckon they must have more this year.   Not bad is it - ended up paying same price as this year.  It still represents great value for me.  Well, until I check my bank account the Monday after the weekend.
    • Well mayors have more powers to do that sh*t...but they have to make the numbers add up.
    • We'll see. Bristol and Leeds are both massively overdue big public transport investment - 2 of the cities with the worst transport infrastructure per capita in Western Europe. If this works to help support investment projects great and fair play to Burnham.
    • The Bródy Day was his idea because Sziget has always been late when it comes to this kind of concert. They would only organize farewell performances or tribute shows after an artist had passed away. Since Bródy is one of the country's greatest singer-songwriters, they wanted to honor him while he is still alive. (He didn't say it exactly like that, but the man is 80 and has just stopped playing large concerts.) He never understood why anyone would focus exclusively on one generation, especially Gen Z, who have less disposable income, drink less, and are, in his words, "afraid of partying." He explained that in the past, people loved festivals because of the nonstop partying, whereas many younger people today find that experience overwhelming or exhausting. That's one of the reasons why Sziget will introduce more chill zones and sensory-friendly spaces. They also want to attract older generations, who are generally more willing and able to spend money. The Sziget Icons days are aimed at this audience, and in the future they hope to create a more balanced lineup that appeals to people over 35 as well.   It was a long interview. If anything else comes to mind, I'll share it.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...