Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2013 Headliners


Guest shangri-la_steward

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 11.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Admin

Tax reasons? Full payment always conveniently falls the other side of April.

I maybe wrong and being very cynical.

you're right about the April sale (which is when the full sale always used to happen) is about the tax issues. But it's not quite how you're thinking.

The tickets get sold, but Glastonbury don't get the money from the ticket agent until after the Festival (that's the standard way of agents handling ticket money, in case it needs refunding) - but whether they have the money or not the VAT is due is in the tax quarter that the sales are made in. So by holding the ticket sale in April it means that Glastonbury don't have to borrow millions of pounds to pay the VAT bill (because the ticket money will be in their hands before payment is due).

I'm not sure how having the sale in October alters things, but I'm guessing (now that they only do deposits) that there's no VAT consequences from taking 'deposits' because they are not (in legal terms) a 'sale' from which VAT is due.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you're right about the April sale (which is when the full sale always used to happen) is about the tax issues. But it's not quite how you're thinking.

The tickets get sold, but Glastonbury don't get the money from the ticket agent until after the Festival (that's the standard way of agents handling ticket money, in case it needs refunding) - but whether they have the money or not the VAT is due is in the tax quarter that the sales are made in. So by holding the ticket sale in April it means that Glastonbury don't have to borrow millions of pounds to pay the VAT bill (because the ticket money will be in their hands before payment is due).

I'm not sure how having the sale in October alters things, but I'm guessing (now that they only do deposits) that there's no VAT consequences from taking 'deposits' because they are not (in legal terms) a 'sale' from which VAT is due.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you're right about the April sale (which is when the full sale always used to happen) is about the tax issues. But it's not quite how you're thinking.

The tickets get sold, but Glastonbury don't get the money from the ticket agent until after the Festival (that's the standard way of agents handling ticket money, in case it needs refunding) - but whether they have the money or not the VAT is due is in the tax quarter that the sales are made in. So by holding the ticket sale in April it means that Glastonbury don't have to borrow millions of pounds to pay the VAT bill (because the ticket money will be in their hands before payment is due).

I'm not sure how having the sale in October alters things, but I'm guessing (now that they only do deposits) that there's no VAT consequences from taking 'deposits' because they are not (in legal terms) a 'sale' from which VAT is due.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I take it the acts don't get paid until after the festival then?

smaller acts do (or at least did) get paid in cash on the day.

For bigger bands, the norm is that a deposit is paid of half the fee a month before the show, and the other half just afterwards. I presume that Glasto work to this normal system, but don't know for sure.

What I do know is that Eavis has to take out a massive loan each year for the advance funding of the fest. Something that was recently reported somewhere said that he's borrowing £15M from a Dutch bank to fund this year's festival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Eavis must have been worrying in 2008 then!

he did - the effect on him was clearly visible, to the point of him looking unwell.

A few months after the fest he looked significantly better. So much so that when I met him then the first words that left my mouth (in some sort of auto-pilot way) were "you're looking well".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he did - the effect on him was clearly visible, to the point of him looking unwell.

A few months after the fest he looked significantly better. So much so that when I met him then the first words that left my mouth (in some sort of auto-pilot way) were "you're looking well".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suffering from headlineritus; CBA TBH :)

I think the only question left is whether the Mumfarts sub The Stones Sat and either Gaga/Prince/Madonna plays Sun, or (heaven forbid) Mumfarts actually headline Sun; that's my current interpretation, taking into account we're on P472 :)

Back to looking busy.............

Edited by oneeye
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...