Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, MEGABOWL said:


It really is. Even if they finish up going for Rodrigo, Fender and Again, tickets for those 3 in Arenas would comfortably set you back £200+


£200+ underselling it really. Rodrigo £120 at BST, Fender £80 on December tour, that's your £200 there. Dunno Fred Again prices (not my speed) but £250+ much closer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Wildglastotheo said:

O-Rod playing BST on Friday is the first evidence proving that ‘The Post’ is/was not correct…. 

It is, every chance though that photo was correct at some point though with BST not in the frame or something. I'm absolutely sure that Fred, Olivia and one of Rihanna, Stevie and if not Fender would have been in the frame. I messaged my friend ages ago when the odds first appeared saying I think Fender might do it hence I put a bet on at 6s. 

 

Also, even Mcfcok believed originally although not totally solid that Olivia was the Friday. I would hazard a guess that she was the Friday and with Fred pulling out probably she could move to the Saturday which was an option anyway and more so with the BST booking. That's the theory. I think Fred would make more sense on the Saturday for the festival if they got Rihanna to split then up but I guess it comes down to more than that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Avalon_Fields said:

I probably value the experiences I’ve had at the festival with friends etc. much more than the acts I’ve seen, and those experiences remain priceless and unforgettable

All my friends just sod off and leave me, every time I've been. Swings and roundabouts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Ben7amin_ said:

 

 

 

I dunno its £30-40 to see academy size bands these days - so if you see 10 £40 sized acts - the you are quids in - and I could do that at Glastonbury in one day

 

£400 For Glastonbury is still incredible value regardless of if you watch headliners or not

Although i fully agree with this statement in terms of comparison to the cost of a gig these days. It does say more about the pricing structure of tickets (£100+ for stadiums, £80 for arenas and so on) when the grass roots venues are closing ten to the dozen. 

 

I will always defend Glastonbury because its not just a performing arts festival, its also an experience like no other but its not really £400 is it. Most times my total spend is nearer £1000 than £400. To some people that really is a vast amount of money.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, jonnytee1 said:

Although i fully agree with this statement in terms of comparison to the cost of a gig these days. It does say more about the pricing structure of tickets (£100+ for stadiums, £80 for arenas and so on) when the grass roots venues are closing ten to the dozen. 

 

I will always defend Glastonbury because its not just a performing arts festival, its also an experience like no other but its not really £400 is it. Most times my total spend is nearer £1000 than £400. To some people that really is a vast amount of money.   

I could never spend that much but I can see how it could be done. I think the price comparison though like that reflects more on people that are willing to pay the structure involved now than anything. The fact we are still paying that price and getting more and more average lineups vs other acts bands we might want that won't agree to do it for the lesser fee because of what they can earn elsewhere says a lot more about it.

 

A bit like Dua Lipa and many now, Olivia will be a one and done. When you're on tier 3 pricing of BST within 20 minutes and it's only people with Amex cards that could buy that tells you she could have could do 2 easily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Muse would indeed be very samey as a multi repeat booking. However I'd rather watch Muse any day of the week over Dua Lipa and Olivia Rodrigo but that's just me. I like live bands and rock / indie music far more than Pop.

 

Don't think they will be playing though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Benjsh said:

Muse would indeed be very samey as a multi repeat booking. However I'd rather watch Muse any day of the week over Dua Lipa and Olivia Rodrigo but that's just me. I like live bands and rock / indie music far more than Pop.

 

Don't think they will be playing though. 


Agree with all of this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Benjsh said:

Muse would indeed be very samey as a multi repeat booking. However I'd rather watch Muse any day of the week over Dua Lipa and Olivia Rodrigo but that's just me. I like live bands and rock / indie music far more than Pop.

 

Don't think they will be playing though. 

 

I'd watch Muse if it was an anniversary performance of any of the first 4 albums with a few greatest hits but their output has progressively got worse up until the last album which almost seemed to be a parody of their whole career.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jonnytee1 said:

 

I'd watch Muse if it was an anniversary performance of any of the first 4 albums with a few greatest hits but their output has progressively got worse up until the last album which almost seemed to be a parody of their whole career.

 

 

I actually thought the last two albums were a big step up on the three before. Especially the last one.

 

The others still have their highlights too. I'd always happily hear the likes of Mercy, Madness and Undisclosed Desires. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Benjsh said:

Muse would indeed be very samey as a multi repeat booking. However I'd rather watch Muse any day of the week over Dua Lipa and Olivia Rodrigo but that's just me. I like live bands and rock / indie music far more than Pop.

 

Don't think they will be playing though. 

 

O Rod plays with a live band

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...