Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

Olivia Rodrigo, Foo Fighters, Taylor Swift

Legend: Robbie Williams

Rayes subbing any of the days

 

Im doubtful on Gaga for 2025, seems more like 2026; when she spins up her next album era likely own shows first before festivals the year after. 2025 might be too soon as she is going to be focusing on promoting Joker 2 later this year.

It still baffles me that she hasnt done it yet. Could have easily done the top slot around Born This Way over 10 years ago.

 

Edited by FrogLobster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, charlierc said:

This was the time to try and get a special reduced version of Eras tbf, but I'm aware it was pretty quickly ruled out by the mega-tour block-booking Dublin for a Glasto weekend. I think she'll do it but not for a few years at best.

No idea whether they had that conversation or not, but it wasn't ever plausible and so isn't a "miss" from the festival. There realistically couldn't be a reduced version of Eras, at least not without gigantic artistic compromises from an artist who has a clear vision and doesn't like to make compromises at all.

Only need to watch the concert film to see what a huge production it is with all of the custom staging and a show tightly choreographed around it. 80% of the show doesn't even take place at the traditional "end stage", and that's just about all they'd have available at Glastonbury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, incident said:

No idea whether they had that conversation or not, but it wasn't ever plausible and so isn't a "miss" from the festival. There realistically couldn't be a reduced version of Eras, at least not without gigantic artistic compromises from an artist who has a clear vision and doesn't like to make compromises at all.

Only need to watch the concert film to see what a huge production it is with all of the custom staging and a show tightly choreographed around it. 80% of the show doesn't even take place at the traditional "end stage", and that's just about all they'd have available at Glastonbury.

Hence why I was assuming any such conversation was a short one if at all. Presumably the planned 2020 tour that didn't happen would've been a slimmer set-up given that was intended to play a quite other festivals alongside Glastonbury (BST Hyde Park, NOS Alive and Mad Cool were planned I think?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, charlierc said:

Hence why I was assuming any such conversation was a short one if at all. Presumably the planned 2020 tour that didn't happen would've been a slimmer set-up given that was intended to play a quite other festivals alongside Glastonbury (BST Hyde Park, NOS Alive and Mad Cool were planned I think?)

Yeah, 2020 was only due to be about 15 dates total across 3 continents, with most of those (at least in Europe) being existing festivals so fairly safe to assume it would have been massively pared back in production terms compared to the enormous stadium tours like Reputation or Eras.

I do think she plays eventually, but certainly not until the dust has settled on Eras and not until the current insane hype has died down a fair bit. Probably it'll need to be outside of a full scale tour, or the tour would need to be a much simplified affair.

Which probably rules her out until 2026 at the absolute minimum and my gut feeling is that it'll be much longer than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, incident said:

Yeah, 2020 was only due to be about 15 dates total across 3 continents, with most of those (at least in Europe) being existing festivals so fairly safe to assume it would have been massively pared back in production terms compared to the enormous stadium tours like Reputation or Eras.

I do think she plays eventually, but certainly not until the dust has settled on Eras and not until the current insane hype has died down a fair bit. Probably it'll need to be outside of a full scale tour, or the tour would need to be a much simplified affair.

Which probably rules her out until 2026 at the absolute minimum and my gut feeling is that it'll be much longer than that.

I don't think she'll be doing it next year tbf. If nothing else after 2 years more or less all about the tour, she's probably earned time off. So yeah, if she is in the chat, it won't be for a little while.

I'm less sure as to who 2025 might be though. I guess we'll see if anything happens like this time when it was clear fairly early on that Dua Lipa and Coldplay would be 2 of the 3 and the other ended up being a bit of a "This guy, no this guy, no this guy, no actually her"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, FrogLobster said:

Olivia Rodrigo, Foo Fighters, Taylor Swift

Legend: Robbie Williams

Rayes subbing any of the days

 

Im doubtful on Gaga for 2025, seems more like 2026; when she spins up her next album era likely own shows first before festivals the year after. 2025 might be too soon as she is going to be focusing on promoting Joker 2 later this year.

It still baffles me that she hasnt done it yet. Could have easily done the top slot around Born This Way over 10 years ago.

 

Foos at Reading. If this is direction wise how they are going and they've allowed the weaker bookings to happen for that to happen then any chance of Olivia, Foos and Swift is a no go. Swift can still milk tour galore plus I doubt she'll be active in 2025.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Aromaticmusic1 said:

What’s making people think foos are at reading

Literally just the one guy above and he’s being over dramatic about Glastonbury‘s pulling power because of this years lineup. Foos could easily still do it. I don’t think it will be them next year, but if the festival asked I’m sure they’d agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aromaticmusic1 said:

What’s making people think foos are at reading

 

2 hours ago, FloopFiller said:

Literally just the one guy above and he’s being over dramatic about Glastonbury‘s pulling power because of this years lineup. Foos could easily still do it. I don’t think it will be them next year, but if the festival asked I’m sure they’d agree.

Not a lot imo. I think it's a hunch more than anything.

I think there's every possibility Foos will be off for 2025 given I think they're still adjusting in a way to losing Taylor plus they toured a lot in 2023/24. But then they are the kind of band that would just carry on touring regardless.

... saying that I told a friend I could get tickets to their Cardiff show so that's on the list of riddles to figure out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, charlierc said:

 

Not a lot imo. I think it's a hunch more than anything.

I think there's every possibility Foos will be off for 2025 given I think they're still adjusting in a way to losing Taylor plus they toured a lot in 2023/24. But then they are the kind of band that would just carry on touring regardless.

... saying that I told a friend I could get tickets to their Cardiff show so that's on the list of riddles to figure out.

Given how long their tours usually are and htey are only just hitting the UK this June after the album out last June, my bet would be Reading 2025 to wrap up the tour.

7 hours ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

2025: Dave / Olivia Rodrigo / Foo Fighters
2026: The 1975 / Sam Fender / Beyonce
2027: Raye / Harry Styles / Radiohead

If Sam Fender is writing again as I just read then I don't see Glastonbury not going in for him and him not saying yes, it's not like he's going to be doing Reading and BST doesn't rule out Glastonbury.

But there is going to be an all female lineup in the next two years I think. Raye, Rihanna and Ariana Grande to all play over the next two years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, northernangel said:

 

If Sam Fender is writing again as I just read then I don't see Glastonbury not going in for him and him not saying yes, it's not like he's going to be doing Reading and BST doesn't rule out Glastonbury.

He's already said a new album is coming this year. Both previous albums have long legs and just keep selling. Listening to the snippets on his SM he's not going leftfield and it sounds like him but even bigger so 2015 would be perfect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, danbailey80 said:

He's already said a new album is coming this year. Both previous albums have long legs and just keep selling. Listening to the snippets on his SM he's not going leftfield and it sounds like him but even bigger so 2015 would be perfect. 

What his new song?, I've heard Iris and the one with Noah Kahn?

Yeah I'd put him down as very likely myself and I don't think Dave is returning to do anything but headline....to big for anything else now except for BST which again doesn't rule him out and he only did Reading in 2022. Add Olivia to that and you've got a new young rapper, female pop star and singer male guitarist....I'm not really sure what he classes as. But the only person I see taking one of those places is Rihanna. I couldn't justify those 3 personally and wouldn't probably take the hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...