Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Superscally said:

Didn't lose anyone near us. Complainers more likely to post.

Set list was bob on. You weren't at the Bootleg Beatles lad.

 

Aye, was one of the busiest crowds near us all weekend from start to finish. 

Entirely different proposition to when Gorillaz played - they hadn't at that point worked out the stagecraft with the animation, so there was no connection with the audience, so we left in droves. 

Entirely different to when Damon headlined with Blur, or even when he played the Park with The Good, The Bad and The Queen. 

Edited by clarkete
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Festival Liam said:

All the arguments back and forth about Eminem, and nobody ever seems to counter the "he's shit live" point. Is that just universally agreed upon?

Yeh… No arguments here.

But then I’m used to that, lots of hiphop artists are poor live 🙈😂 I’d still love it. 

Having said that Jurassic 5 were decent, and I have high hopes for de la soul in feb… 🤞

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Alvoram said:

Yeh… No arguments here.

But then I’m used to that, lots of hiphop artists are poor live 🙈😂 I’d still love it. 

Having said that Jurassic 5 were decent, and I have high hopes for de la soul in feb… 🤞

J5 and DLS are always great live, that sort of more chilled, beats heavy hip hop translates much better live than a guy with a hype man shouting over a backing track.

Not to say it can’t be done, Kendrick nailed it for example, but it was clear how much thought, effort and artistry went into that show. Is Eminem capable of performing to that standard? Not from my experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Alvoram said:

Yeh… No arguments here.

But then I’m used to that, lots of hiphop artists are poor live 🙈😂

yeah, some geezer shouting at you is not fun. 😛 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd actually counter this, he was fantastic at Reading 2013 - as you've said it's more of a hype man style (we had Mr Porter also on stage) but it went down very well. I've seen most of the greats and Eminem was probably one of the most intense, up there with Travis Scott.

For Glastonbury, I'm not sure if Eminem would use a hypeman as I'd class it as a more mainstream show, so I'm not sure the format would work. I'd love to see a revolving door of affiliated artists as he's done some great collaborations.

Kendrick was a rare one because it was artistically driven, I'd say to an extent maybe too much as there were some periods where you wondered what was going on - bit different in a festival setting. He's up there in my top 5 for hip hop performances though!

Edited by discgoesmic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheFieryFurnace18 said:

I really hope gorillaz get another chance to headline 

I don't, they were bloody awful in 2011 and also terrible at Lollapalooza in Paris in 2018. In 2018 they were only interested in playing their new songs (from The Now Now), all of their classics just played on a screen behind them including a lot of the vocals. It's a shame because I saw them on the Plastic Beach tour in 2010 and it was great, but they seem to have gone downhill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, discgoesmic said:

I don't, they were bloody awful in 2011 and also terrible at Lollapalooza in Paris in 2018. In 2018 they were only interested in playing their new songs (from The Now Now), all of their classics just played on a screen behind them including a lot of the vocals. It's a shame because I saw them on the Plastic Beach tour in 2010 and it was great, but they seem to have gone downhill.

That's interesting, I saw them at rock werchter 2018 and it was one of the funnest experiences I've had at a gig. They did play off the back of QOTSA though and I was wasted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, GrumpyRaver said:

Is he back AGAIN??? Jesus, John… make up your fucking mind!

Fucks sake.  Isn't it every time he gets clean they take him back and then he starts on the drugs again?  Besides, you ever read or heard any interviews with him?  He's such an arrogant olympic standard bellend.

10 hours ago, Superscally said:

Unbridled joy where we were. 

Same.  Whereas when we tried to leave the field for Gorillaz after 30 mins or so, you couldn't get out of the pyramid field because it was log jammed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TheFieryFurnace18 said:

That's interesting, I saw them at rock werchter 2018 and it was one of the funnest experiences I've had at a gig. They did play off the back of QOTSA though and I was wasted. 

Last time I saw them was the £5 Brixton show, and they were great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, strummer77 said:

They’d be great Other Stage headliners I think. 

Wonder if they could be convinced to do it? I'd see that as a bit of a hit to their stock honestly - globally they are pretty stable headliners.

They were great at Boardmasters in 2021 and their APE show had good reviews too - i think they would smash either slot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gfa said:

Wonder if they could be convinced to do it? I'd see that as a bit of a hit to their stock honestly - globally they are pretty stable headliners.

They were great at Boardmasters in 2021 and their APE show had good reviews too - i think they would smash either slot

They were only ever stand-ins for U2 on the pyramid anyway. Should never have been there. Other is the ideal slot. Saw them at Primavera this year and they were excellent, tons of amazing guests. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Superscally said:

Unbridled joy where we were. 

Somewhere towards the front by any chance?  I would have loved to have been there, but not at the festival at all sadly, so can't say how I'd have managed with the setlist.  I loved Radiohead last time they played, I was fairly central and forward so everyone around me was staying put and loving it, but I fully accept that further back I think the general reception was 'meh'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, p.pete said:

Somewhere towards the front by any chance?  I would have loved to have been there, but not at the festival at all sadly, so can't say how I'd have managed with the setlist.  I loved Radiohead last time they played, I was fairly central and forward so everyone around me was staying put and loving it, but I fully accept that further back I think the general reception was 'meh'.

You shouldn't accept it, I'm an old git so pretty much always at the back and the reception was great. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 4AssedMonkey said:

Fucks sake.  Isn't it every time he gets clean they take him back and then he starts on the drugs again?  Besides, you ever read or heard any interviews with him?  He's such an arrogant olympic standard bellend.

No? He’s been clean since the late 90s. His departure from the band over the last decade was due to him perusing a career in electronic music.

Dunno what interviews you’re talking about either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, clarkete said:

You shouldn't accept it, I'm an old git so pretty much always at the back and the reception was great. 

This changes everything!  Haha - I probably would have loved that one from the back too 🙂  I think there are some acts that will entertain the majority of the crowd, I know a few who weren't bothered with Radiohead, and there are plenty of people whose preferred spot to watch from is at the back.  Acts that lose the crowd though, I assume it's the fringes where the movement is greatest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SomeoneListeningIn said:

No? He’s been clean since the late 90s. His departure from the band over the last decade was due to him perusing a career in electronic music.

Dunno what interviews you’re talking about either.

When he left around 2009 he was talking about his drive and creativity being from another plain and his music being inspired by guiding spirits as a gift to the world or some bullshit.  Then when asked about his beliefs or spirituality he said he couldn't talk about it.  Either as high as a motherfucker or a complete pretentious w*nker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eminem is well past his best, but he is arguably the greatest hip hop artist of all time so I'd imagine he could be one for the Eavii to tick off the list.

Oh, and while we're on the subject of RHCP, they absolutely suck live.

Edited by VCK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 4AssedMonkey said:

When he left around 2009 he was talking about his drive and creativity being from another plain and his music being inspired by guiding spirits as a gift to the world or some bullshit.  Then when asked about his beliefs or spirituality he said he couldn't talk about it.  Either as high as a motherfucker or a complete pretentious w*nker.

Flea & AK aren't short on spiritual bullshit at the best of times.  I'm sure they've indulged him lots over the years and presumably a bigger impact on who he is than any impact he's ever had on them.  Difference is Flea & AK sort of pull it off / get away with it, whereas I can imagine someone a bit younger growing up around them is only ever going to end up as you've described.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 4AssedMonkey said:

When he left around 2009 he was talking about his drive and creativity being from another plain and his music being inspired by guiding spirits as a gift to the world or some bullshit.  Then when asked about his beliefs or spirituality he said he couldn't talk about it.  Either as high as a motherfucker or a complete pretentious w*nker.

Never read that interview, do you have a link?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, 4AssedMonkey said:

When he left around 2009 he was talking about his drive and creativity being from another plain and his music being inspired by guiding spirits as a gift to the world or some bullshit.  Then when asked about his beliefs or spirituality he said he couldn't talk about it.  Either as high as a motherfucker or a complete pretentious w*nker.

Is every musician required to explain in detail their religious beliefs when asked in an interview?

Edited by Florian Saucer Attack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Florian Saucer Attack said:

Is every musician required to explain in detail their religious beliefs when asked in an interview?

No.  But all the interviewer did was react to the direction Frusciante took the conversation.  If asked about his new material/album and he starts spouting about being inspired by guiding spirits, of course the interviewer is going to go with it.  Then to shut it down just makes him look like a prick tease or a c**t.  Or both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SomeoneListeningIn said:

Never read that interview, do you have a link?

Can't recall.  It was a guitar magazine I bought for a flight or for long train journey but don't remember which one.  Just after his solo release following leaving RHCP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...