Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Taylor swift


brettredmayne

Recommended Posts

Just now, WestCountryGirl said:

Only just saw that Would've is a Swift&Dessner track. They can do no wrong.

Would've... is a clear favourite for me right now. Listened to the 3am Edition four times now, and like others have said, once you get your head around the chilled synth vibe of the album and the fact it's not full of party bangers or the Soft Rock/Stevie Nicks-inspired masterpiece a lot of people were hoping/expecting (myself included), its an incredibly strong set of songs that are unfurling and penetrating more and more with each listen. The few tracks that didn't really grab me the first time around have started to take hold and hook into my brain. It does help that I really liked it after the first listen as I was a little worried after the initial reviews started to drip through on here last night. 

I will always be a Folklore/Evermore fan more than any of the other 'eras' of her career, but the production throughout is outstanding and i'm glad we've got the EP/Vault tracks straight away as they are shaping up to be some of my favourites from the whole set. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, jparx said:

Each to their own! Just a catchy, fun song for me. I don't get repulsed by individual song lyrics in that sense.

Karma is quite clearly her way of saying that the simple things in her life outweigh the drama / rivalries she’s been exposed to in the past. Best revenge is getting happy with Joey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

‘Good pop album’ is all she needs at this stage tbf. If she transitions into a legacy act then the setlists going forward will be banging, it’s a win-win. 

This. Make it so! (It won't happen.)

Standouts after two spins are MaroonAnti-HeroYou're on Your Own, Kid and Mastermind. It is very Melodrama Pt. II when it comes to Jack Antonoff's work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 minute ago, Matt42 said:

Karma is quite clearly her way of saying that the simple things in her life outweigh the drama / rivalries she’s been exposed to in the past. Best revenge is getting happy with Joey.

Speaking of Joey, I love that she’s still persisting with using his alias in the songwriting credits even after everyone busted that little ruse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harmonic Prospector said:

Would've... is a clear favourite for me right now. Listened to the 3am Edition four times now, and like others have said, once you get your head around the chilled synth vibe of the album and the fact it's not full of party bangers or the Soft Rock/Stevie Nicks-inspired masterpiece a lot of people were hoping/expecting (myself included), its an incredibly strong set of songs that are unfurling and penetrating more and more with each listen. The few tracks that didn't really grab me the first time around have started to take hold and hook into my brain. It does help that I really liked it after the first listen as I was a little worried after the initial reviews started to drip through on here last night. 

I will always be a Folklore/Evermore fan more than any of the other 'eras' of her career, but the production throughout is outstanding and i'm glad we've got the EP/Vault tracks straight away as they are shaping up to be some of my favourites from the whole set. 

 

Very well put - completely agree.

I adore Folklore / Evermore, but for me nothing can beat 1989 / Rep so it has probably taken me a little bit longer than you to accept the more chilled vibe and lack of party bangers, but now I have it is a really strong album.  Started at a 6.5, but yeah it does hook into your brain with each listen and is now a very good 8/10 for me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm quite comfortable at this point in slapping on a strong 9/10 on this record. It's resonated with me big time, a number of the tunes have already been stuck in my head and I'm just discovering more on each listen. It was really quite jarring based on the initial rumours and it threw me a bit, but now we've settled in to this direction I think it's tremendous.

Lots of comparisons being drawn up to Lorde and Melodrama. For me it's not as good as that album, but if you slapped a Green Light on it then you're right in the ball park. I'm not in the camp of bemoaning bangers, Taylor already has more than enough in her catalogue and I'm happy to go along this journey of exploring new eras, but if you had a Cruel Summer/Green Light type belter on here it would just finish it off perfectly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three albums in a row with no out and out party anthems. I think the combination of a settled personal life, and being on a label which is less reliant on ‘just her’ to survive, has probably ensured that those days are done. And that’s fine. As said above, there’s enough bangerz already in her arsenal that any more just means the old ones being pushed further out of setlist contention, which is not what anyone wants to see. 

Edited by Rose-Colored Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

Three albums in a row with no out and out party anthems. I think the combination of a settled personal life, and being on a label which is less reliant on ‘just her’ to survive, has ensured that those days are done. And that’s fine. As said above, there’s enough bangerz already in her arsenal that any more just means the old ones being pushed further out of setlist contention, which is not what anyone wants to see. 

Agreed. If Midnights had a Green Light level banger, it would edge it closer to perfection for me. But equally it doesn't need that to still be a great album. And Folklore certainly didn't need a banger to be an absolute classic. 

2 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

Although that said, this album being played more or less in full in a stadium setting will be.. eh 

I'd wait and see on that. She's not daft, she knows the audience and venues she'll be playing. Reputation was considered by some to be a nadir of sorts but the material was received really well live. Wouldn't surprise me if some of these tunes come across as much dancier/more energetic in a live setting. And you know the Swifties will be in to it regardless - it's festivals where it could be an issue (maybe that's why she might not be doing them..?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jparx said:

Agreed. If Midnights had a Green Light level banger, it would edge it closer to perfection for me. But equally it doesn't need that to still be a great album. And Folklore certainly didn't need a banger to be an absolute classic. 

I'd wait and see on that. She's not daft, she knows the audience and venues she'll be playing. Reputation was considered by some to be a nadir of sorts but the material was received really well live. Wouldn't surprise me if some of these tunes come across as much dancier/more energetic in a live setting. And you know the Swifties will be in to it regardless - it's festivals where it could be an issue (maybe that's why she might not be doing them..?)

Dunno. We live in hope obviously but it was very easy to see how the likes of Getaway Car and I Did Something Bad would work in stadium sized venues, and there’s almost nothing on here which really compares to those in spectacle and ‘Oomph’. If she made it a Lover/Folkmore/Midnights Mega Tour, with some anthems from the re-records sprinkled in, that’d work, but her usual setlist formula would bomb hard I fear. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

Dunno. We live in hope obviously but it was very easy to see how the likes of Getaway Car and I Did Something Bad would work in stadium sized venues, and there’s almost nothing on here which really compares to those in spectacle and ‘Oomph’. If she made it a Lover/Folkmore/Midnights Mega Tour, with some anthems from the re-records sprinkled in, that’d work, but her usual setlist formula would bomb hard I fear. 

Again it depends on the setting. Festivals - yes, 100% agree. Her own headline shows, which are likely going to sell out quickly after 5 years without touring, in front of a rabid Swifty audience? I'm not sure it's possible for her to bomb in that setting even if she played Endgame 20 times over on a penny whistle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jparx said:

Again it depends on the setting. Festivals - yes, 100% agree. Her own headline shows, which are likely going to sell out quickly after 5 years without touring, in front of a rabid Swifty audience? I'm not sure it's possible for her to bomb in that setting even if she played Endgame 20 times over on a penny whistle.

😂😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

Dunno. We live in hope obviously but it was very easy to see how the likes of Getaway Car and I Did Something Bad would work in stadium sized venues, and there’s almost nothing on here which really compares to those in spectacle and ‘Oomph’. If she made it a Lover/Folkmore/Midnights Mega Tour, with some anthems from the re-records sprinkled in, that’d work, but her usual setlist formula would bomb hard I fear. 

I would be quite happy for the usual formula for her Tour, and then Greatest Hits at Glasto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, jparx said:

Endgame 20 times over on a penny whistle.

Sensational

17 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

Dunno. We live in hope obviously but it was very easy to see how the likes of Getaway Car and I Did Something Bad would work in stadium sized venues, and there’s almost nothing on here which really compares to those in spectacle and ‘Oomph’. If she made it a Lover/Folkmore/Midnights Mega Tour, with some anthems from the re-records sprinkled in, that’d work, but her usual setlist formula would bomb hard I fear. 

With an album like 1989, the formula of the new record in full and a handful of old cuts worked - because it was maximum, singalong pop all the way to the bank.

There's a few tracks here where you can imagine them flying with a bombastic arrangement in stadiums - see Anti-Hero - but otherwise will concur, could do with a more judicious approach.

When I did my mock setlist a few pages back, tried to roughly balance those ideas for being hits-friendly. (See: We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together - and I was still missing big cuts like Blank Space off there.) If this cycle could represent the start of her playing old material as it sounds, with no tweaks, no mashups, I'd be elated.

But imagine she'll stick to the pop show formula. Prepare for most of this, a swathe of Lover, choice cuts from folklore and evermore, topped off with three or four old hits (one of which will definitely be All Too Well.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jparx said:

I reckon she's doing a Midnights focussed tour next summer, then a greatest hits focussed tour either the year after or when the re-releases are finished, and that's when she honours the festival bookings.

if this is the case i really do feel for your Swift fans, potentially having her headline 4 years after she was supposed to is a real kicker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, scatteredscreens said:

if this is the case i really do feel for your Swift fans, potentially having her headline 4 years after she was supposed to is a real kicker.

Oh mate I'm desperately hoping she doesn't headline next year, I'm probably not going to be able to go!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...