news & politics:discussion

[Crazyfool01]

who is this knob talking about the rules ?  

[DareToDibble]

You could quite easily replace Boris with a soundboard and there would be no difference. The same few answers on repeat for hours on end. 

[Guest]

I want a hug from Ian Blackford.

[jparx]

Who's this utter weapon?

[Guest]

This whole thing shows that the structure of Parliament needs big changes. 

[DareToDibble]

I am genuinely staggered by that answer about drug use. Holy shit he's losing the plot.

[Guest]

So you can’t call out a liar but you can accuse the opposite bench of doing drugs?

[Ayrshire Chris]

I see a lot of his back benchers have pissed off to the  bars. 

[Crazyfool01]

1 minute ago, Ayrshire Chris said:

I see a lot of his back benchers have pissed off to the  bars. 

to snort some coke after a tough day is more likely 

[ian the worm]

Seen the headliners, off to SE corner. 

[DareToDibble]

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

So you can’t call out a liar but you can accuse the opposite bench of doing drugs?

Very good point. Hoyle is useless.

[Ryan1984]

The top Mail stories on their site are not positive reading for him. Will he also lose the Express?

[fatyeti24]

6 minutes ago, Ryan1984 said:

The top Mail stories on their site are not positive reading for him. Will he also lose the Express?

Doesn't matter.  Nobody reads the Express. 

[squirrelarmy]

The headlines are writing themselves tomorrow, some words that rhyme:

Lies + Dies. Lying + Dying, Lied + Died. I'm expecting to see lots of variations on that theme.

[Ryan1984]

Just now, fatyeti24 said:

Doesn't matter.  Nobody reads the Express. 

The Scum, however, lead with ‘I’m sorry’. They want the apology to be the end of it.

[Guest]

 

 

[Guest]

 

 

[Homer]

So I counted that as five tories who went for him?

May, Baker, Mitchell and the two backbenchers sat next to each other and went one after each other.

[Guest]

 

This is shocking.

[found home in 2009]

2 hours ago, Ozanne said:

So I was right all along. The report is pretty useless and doesn’t really tell us anything we didn’t know already. It doesn’t say anything specific. This will exonerate Johnson, which is what it was intended to do. 

It lists 12 parties and say that 8 of them have enough evidence for the police to conduct a criminal investigation.

We also know it's absolute fact now as it's based on "emails; Whatsapp messages; text messages; photographs and building entry and exit logs". Any Tory supporters that were trying to kid themselves on that it was a media witch hunt now have to accept that its been confirmed as factual by the civil service.

We also know that Johnson wont be getting a sneak preview of the evidence: 

"I will not be circulating the information internally within government, it has been provided in confidence to the Cabinet Office investigation team and it is important that this confidence is maintained to protect the integrity of the process."

And this isn't even the report, it's an update about the progress of the report. It does sound like maybe more will come out with the full report.

[fatyeti24]

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

 

This is shocking.

Shocking, and yet completely unsurprising.

He's lower than a snake's belly, this fucker.

[Guest]

Just now, fatyeti24 said:

Shocking, and yet completely unsurprising.

He's lower than a snake's belly, this fucker.

Why bring up Saville? It's just disgusting to even go there. 

[Crazyfool01]

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

Why bring up Saville? It's just disgusting to even go there. 

deflect from things isnt it ? 

[steviewevie]

 

[Guest]

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

 

In Starmer we trust.