Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Ozanne said:

Guido is a renowned far right site, but interesting that it's tighter than previously thought. It seems it's because voters have put smaller parties as their first choice.

 

 

"complacency from voters" is quite the quote lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SwedgeAntilles said:

Retire some old codger and parachute Burnham in. 

yeah...maybe...but soon as Burnham is there he will be restricted by the same old shit of trying not to offend anyone and in the end not pleasing anyone. Burnham wasn't that left wing or anything...he was Blairite then Brownite...and has the luxury of being able to be normal as Gtr Manc mayor, well spoken northern guy, but being labour leader is whole different ball game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SwedgeAntilles said:

"Immigration, brexit, too woke, too left wing" all charting pretty fucking low there lads....

 

And 2 of the 3 top reasons for voting Tory: “most competent” and “best on pandemic”

Just give up now everyone. Games over. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

yeah...maybe...but soon as Burnham is there he will be restricted by the same old shit of trying not to offend anyone and in the end not pleasing anyone. Burnham wasn't that left wing or anything...he was Blairite then Brownite...and has the luxury of being able to be normal as Gtr Manc mayor, well spoken northern guy, but being labour leader is whole different ball game.

I said it in here the other day but I think Starmer's big issue at the moment is that he's not seen as being genuine. There's too much of his public persona that looks contrived. He was at his strongest during the brexit negotiations when you could see he was passionate about what he was fighting for. He doesn't have that same passion as Leader of the Party and it shows.

Burnham has, at least, that "man of the people" aura about him, certainly since he's been mayor if not before, so it gives him a fighting chance.

Plus, like you say, he's northern. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SwedgeAntilles said:

Retire some old codger and parachute Burnham in. 

There are people there but I don't think they should be looking at changing leader, they need to focus on putting together policy ideas that appeal to the public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SwedgeAntilles said:

I said it in here the other day but I think Starmer's big issue at the moment is that he's not seen as being genuine. There's too much of his public persona that looks contrived. He was at his strongest during the brexit negotiations when you could see he was passionate about what he was fighting for. He doesn't have that same passion as Leader of the Party and it shows.

Burnham has, at least, that "man of the people" aura about him, certainly since he's been mayor if not before, so it gives him a fighting chance.

Plus, like you say, he's northern. 

yeah...I mean, I like him. I voted for him this morning. But I just can imagine everyone slagging him off 6 months after he becomes labour leader because he isn't left/centrist enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

The top reason people didn't vote Labour last December was corbyn. Wonder if the people pushing the Starmer thing have accepted that yet

I don't have a horse in the Corbyn/Starmer race but it seems a lot like that the problem is a lot bigger than either of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

I am currently looking to buy a bunker and emerge once a year for Glastonbury  even better if its a bunker in Pilton ... any rightmove links would be greatly appreciated ... Ive had enough of wrong moves and this bloody govt 😞 

Not seen any bunkers, will a fort in the sea do? Might need a lotto win first.

https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/81841306#/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jparx said:

I’m reaching the point where I just want to throw my hands up and say fuck it. People are now consistently voting directly against their best interests in terms of social and economic policy out of fear and a desire for “change”, without acknowledging they’re voting for more of the same. A Tory government is, economically speaking at least, fairly decent for me, so what’s even the point in fighting it anymore? I grew up in the north and I totally get the frustrations, but they’re going in totally the wrong direction and I almost just want to watch it play out until they realise exactly what they’ve voted for time and again.

I won’t throw in the towel because that’s precisely what they want, but damn it’s getting more and more tempting.

This argument is actually really refreshing - in a strange way.

They will call you a disconnected wokie despite coming from the same communities - but yeah nothing is going to change unless things get noticeably worse for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

I always find it weird that people say that the electorate won't vote for Starmer because he's too much part of the London elite, forgetting that they vote for Johnson who is there epitomisation of the London elite.

Yeah - I think it’s because when they say elite they mean middle class socialists. Not Tory bankers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

There are people there but I don't think they should be looking at changing leader, they need to focus on putting together policy ideas that appeal to the public.

They should have gone with Lisa nandy but I think she fucked it when she said she was anti-royalty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • I got in for £11.25 in the end, which was absolutely ridiculously good value, and made the queues and overselling of the venue much more tolerable! Sniping in on other people’s unwanted tickets on the day of an event might become my new hobby I think 🥳
    • Ann and Nancy Wilson are planning a final world tour for HEART starting next year. They were never at Glastonbury. They should do it. 
    • sub yes I could see but I don't think they get 1hr 15, a headliner starting at 18:15 though is unlikely. Even the recent co-headlines that have had like 1hr 15 then a 1hr 30 after were on 8pm or just before, you are trailing behind more than 1.5 hours then. In that scenario some 3rd down bands are only starting at 18:15 and some haven't lol. I agree they won't not book them due to this but it won't be 6 headliners. It would be 5 headliners and you wouldn't want to see 5 headliners booked but Biffy were to not be thouhgt of as an option for one. Wolf Alice on the other hand could sub no bother and you'd think nothing of it. I'm not so sure Biffy would get headline though after the festival choice in Kendal this year.
    • Definitely. UKIP also used Merkel welcoming 1 million Afgans to Europe in 2015 during the brexit vote.   Politicians in other countries within the EU know the are going to lose voters to parties to the right of them over stuff like this and they've no control over it.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...