Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, zahidf said:

Moderana to start April deliveries, so small amount of first doses then

I imagine this is going to be very low doses to start, so perhaps used in the efforts to ensure everyone in the top 9 groups has had at least their first dose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jcatley said:

I imagine this is going to be very low doses to start, so perhaps used in the efforts to ensure everyone in the top 9 groups has had at least their first dose.

45k a week, so yeah i guess. But hopefully some movement in the 40-49 can be made

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

To be fair they are also the group that was hit hardest with all the death. 

For me it's not the risk of not being able to fly. It's the risk of getting it once on holiday. Without at least one jab, and it circulating around everywhere if they've opened up tourism, chances are going to be high. And even if it only knocks me around a bit, that's a shitty few days of holiday. Probably followed by another shitty few days as my partner gets it. And if you do end up being hospitalised... will travel insurance cover that? 

I was only thinking in terms of after one - I agree I don't think insurance would help you if you went unvaccinated

The negative test should really just be for one dosers- that's where the fairness aspect crosses over with economic reality I guess, that they've shown a willingness to get vaccinated for the good of others, very unlikely to clog up other country's health system (not with covid anyway...) but the timing of their second vaccine is out of their hands. 

Though easiest is still "stay in the country till you've had two" - everyone knows where they stand then. I definitely won't be going abroad this year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, zahidf said:

Lockdown extension vote renewal next thursday. Interesting if the CRG rebel again

 

30 minutes ago, zahidf said:

Lockdown extension vote renewal next thursday. Interesting if the CRG rebel again

Won't make any difference.  Labour will support it so will easily have votes to pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Oboy82 said:

 

Won't make any difference.  Labour will support it so will easily have votes to pass.

I'm sure Johnson would rather not have to rely on labour votes.

I don't think many tory MPs will rebel, especially now as a pause in vaccination supplies. As far as I can see the public is mostly supportive of the roadmap, and the tories are polling well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting that's it apparently Indian government that have blocked shipments to uk. With their rising case rate, I see it as unlikely they will suddenly start allowing shipments for next few months.

That in addition to eu blocking shipments then uk roll out is going to come to a shuddering halt soon enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hancock says he wants to clear up some rumours circulating.

He says there will be no weeks in April when people will not be getting first doses.

He says there will be no cancelled appointments.

And he says second doses will go ahead as planned.

 

Hancock says the UK has been providing Gibraltar with vaccine, and Gibraltar has become the first nation in the world to vaccinate its entire adult population, he says.

Edited by zahidf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
4 minutes ago, Oboy82 said:

Interesting that's it apparently Indian government that have blocked shipments to uk. With their rising case rate, I see it as unlikely they will suddenly start allowing shipments for next few months.

That in addition to eu blocking shipments then uk roll out is going to come to a shuddering halt soon enough.

India isn't using all of the supplies it has available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eFestivals said:

India isn't using all of the supplies it has available.

Have to assume they are ramping up vaccination programme.  If the manufacturers themselves are coming out to say this is the reason we can't export.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Oboy82 said:

Statement put out by manufacturer reported by the guardian.

yes, just saw it...

Indian government responsible for hold-up in vaccine supply to UK, says manufacturer

Adar Poonawalla, head of the Serum Institute of India, which is manufacturing the AstraZeneca vaccine in India, has told the Daily Telegraph that a decision by the Indian government is to blame for a hold-up in supplies to the UK, not production problem. He said:

It is solely dependent on India and it has nothing to do with the SII. It is to do with the Indian government allowing more doses to the UK.

The Telegraph says the Indian government is temporarily holding up exports because of a concern about rising cases in the country.

SII has already exported 5m doses to the UK, but another 5m are on order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...