Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Mr.Tease said:

I can imagine- I'm fortunate to not have to work in an office, but I do think the thought of going back to working in an office full time with long train commutes etc must seem like a horrible prospect for a lot of people who have got to experience life without all that wasted time travelling. Commuting to work was really getting to me before all the covid stuff took off- just hours and hours of wasted time, stress, money, cancelled and delayed overpacked trains, worry about being late, not able to get home- it feels like another lifetime ago!

It’s not the commute for me, as I have a 20 minute walk to work. I don’t like the office environment with bickering over temperature, climate control systems that circulate bugs round the floor and seeing people that I don’t really want to see for 8 hours a day. WFH or more importantly the option to still do it gives me that freedom to flexibly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr.Tease said:

I can imagine- I'm fortunate to not have to work in an office, but I do think the thought of going back to working in an office full time with long train commutes etc must seem like a horrible prospect for a lot of people who have got to experience life without all that wasted time travelling. Commuting to work was really getting to me before all the covid stuff took off- just hours and hours of wasted time, stress, money, cancelled and delayed overpacked trains, worry about being late, not able to get home- it feels like another lifetime ago!

Leaving my house at 6.45am to get to a meeting in Bristol at 9, which is about 20 miles from my house, seems ludicrous now.

Did it many times but didn’t think about it at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mr.Tease said:

I can imagine- I'm fortunate to not have to work in an office, but I do think the thought of going back to working in an office full time with long train commutes etc must seem like a horrible prospect for a lot of people who have got to experience life without all that wasted time travelling. Commuting to work was really getting to me before all the covid stuff took off- just hours and hours of wasted time, stress, money, cancelled and delayed overpacked trains, worry about being late, not able to get home- it feels like another lifetime ago!

Yeah I'm not looking forward to the commute. I used to do two days in, two days out at my main employer, with the fifth day being a mix depending who I was working for. While that is the right fit for me in terms of office time, the tube journey used to fill me with dread. It's a pretty short journey but I hate being packed in like sardines. Already used to give me anxiety some mornings, no idea what it will be like now. Will likely start back in with just one day a week and see how it goes.

Also not looking forward to getting up a whole hour earlier again on those days! 

In my case, though, if I wanted to work from home forever I could (I'm freelance so can set my own terms to a degree) but I do miss the office chat and social side now. I'm torn between anxiety at going back to the way things were and wanting to get the fuck out of the house!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

Yeah I'm not looking forward to the commute. I used to do two days in, two days out at my main employer, with the fifth day being a mix depending who I was working for. While that is the right fit for me in terms of office time, the tube journey used to fill me with dread. It's a pretty short journey but I hate being packed in like sardines. Already used to give me anxiety some mornings, no idea what it will be like now. Will likely start back in with just one day a week and see how it goes.

Also not looking forward to getting up a whole hour earlier again on those days! 

In my case, though, if I wanted to work from home forever I could (I'm freelance so can set my own terms to a degree) but I do miss the office chat and social side now. I'm torn between anxiety at going back to the way things were and wanting to get the fuck out of the house!

I want to get out of the house, but not to go to the office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

I want to get out of the house, but not to go to the office.

This. I want to go to the gym, I want to go to the pub, I want to go to a gig, I want to see my friends, I want to go on holiday. Office is low down the list.

That said I'm happy to wait and follow the old roadmap too. A few weeks more after the year we've had feels doable to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ozanne said:

It’s not the commute for me, as I have a 20 minute walk to work. I don’t like the office environment with bickering over temperature, climate control systems that circulate bugs round the floor and seeing people that I don’t really want to see for 8 hours a day. WFH or more importantly the option to still do it gives me that freedom to flexibly. 

I used to be the same on on that - with the added issue of not actually feeling capable of getting my work done in the hours I was there due to pointless meetings and constant distractions. I used to be so moody with people when I had stuff to do! 

Since going freelance I actually slightly enjoy my work

Edited by efcfanwirral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, zahidf said:

 

 

2 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

It seems like the UK is doing well at understanding the risk associated with inaction can be greater than the risk of action with incomplete knowledge. We're in a pandemic, normal rules don't apply.

Question is - will that be just the second dose for some of us, or are we having 2 in quick succession?

And also of course brings the question of will this include advice to delay the 21st June measures until this is done?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

 

Question is - will that be just the second dose for some of us, or are we having 2 in quick succession?

And also of course brings the question of will this include advice to delay the 21st June measures until this is done?

I imagine the boosters will be for those in the high-priority groups. Not sure if it will extend to the whole population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

 

Question is - will that be just the second dose for some of us, or are we having 2 in quick succession?

And also of course brings the question of will this include advice to delay the 21st June measures until this is done?

these are for over 65s only at the moment, so presumably would be a third dose a few months after theyve already had their second dose. 

I don't think thats in the JVCI's purview with reagrds to delaying June 21st. Thats up to SAGE. Id be surprised though, my reading of it is that its a precaution so they DONT have to lock us up over winter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, zahidf said:

these are for over 65s only at the moment, so presumably would be a third dose a few months after theyve already had their second dose. 

I don't think thats in the JVCI's purview with reagrds to delaying June 21st. Thats up to SAGE. Id be surprised though, my reading of it is that its a precaution so they DONT have to lock us up over winter

booster with vaccine tweaked for most dominant variant? like flu...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, zero000 said:

I imagine the boosters will be for those in the high-priority groups. Not sure if it will extend to the whole population.

 

6 minutes ago, zahidf said:

these are for over 65s only at the moment, so presumably would be a third dose a few months after theyve already had their second dose. 

I don't think thats in the JVCI's purview with reagrds to delaying June 21st. Thats up to SAGE. Id be surprised though, my reading of it is that its a precaution so they DONT have to lock us up over winter

I agree they'll only be needed for the priority groups, though I wonder if, when "pandemic" ends and we go back to the normal rules of profit, whether AZ will lobby/bribe for everyone to need one so they can actually make some money from it. 

Not saying that's a bad thing or anti vaccine or anything about restrictions, just that this is generally how the world works. It'll change from supposed altruism to big business very quickly. 

Edited by efcfanwirral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

and I guess they don't have to go through all the different phases of trials for these updated vaccines...and can fast track approval...

Yeah they've already said that adapted booster shots will be fast track approval

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, sisco said:

From what I read it didn’t appear to have any other caveats.  Oh and a test after the event too

that makes sense as a pilot but if we end up with lateral flow being needed for festivals, it's kind of saying no festivals to me. Logistically its impossible plus once all restrictions are lifted the virus realistically will be spreading everywhere so how many might get turned away? Interesting if this is the route they're going down - feels like it may fail at this hurdle 

Edited by efcfanwirral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

that makes sense as a pilot but if we end up with lateral flow being needed for festivals, it's kind of saying no festivals to me. Logistically its impossible plus once all restrictions are lifted the virus realistically will be spreading everywhere so how many might get turned away? Interesting if this is the route they're going down - feels like it may fail at this hurdle 

It's probably more to assess how any virus spreads at the event rather than an indicator of the future. Free lateral flow test a few days before the event is fine 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

that makes sense as a pilot but if we end up with lateral flow being needed for festivals, it's kind of saying no festivals to me. Logistically its impossible plus once all restrictions are lifted the virus realistically will be spreading everywhere so how many might get turned away? Interesting if this is the route they're going down - feels like it may fail at this hurdle 

To me it’s more of a effort to show That a massive % didn’t contract something at the even as a way to show June 21st is a date to open things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Sasperella said:

"That X-thing was dreadful" 

Hypocrite 

? Is that a quote of mine? Even if I disagree with a particular protest that doesn't mean I think all protest should be restricted we already have laws to deal with criminal behaviour during a protest we don't need new ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sisco said:

20,000 in for the FA cup final as one of the test events.  Lateral Flow negative test needed before

Is that it? If that’s as far as they expect to be on test events by the middle of May. A socially distanced cup final even with testing then the idea we’re going back to normal 5 weeks later is a bit of a reach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...