Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, xxialac said:

They went up, then down.

We went up, then down, then up again (and still rising).

To the untrained eye, it looks like our measures were nowhere near tough enough.

Would people be more willing to follow stricter rules if their healthcare wasn't free at the point of use? Could the fact that the NHS is always just there fore you play a part in causing some complaint behaviours in individuals and in government? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

Would people be more willing to follow stricter rules if their healthcare wasn't free at the point of use? Could the fact that the NHS is always just there fore you play a part in causing some complaint behaviours in individuals and in government? 

It's not gone that well in America

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

Would people be more willing to follow stricter rules if their healthcare wasn't free at the point of use? Could the fact that the NHS is always just there fore you play a part in causing some complaint behaviours in individuals and in government? 

Hard to say that the US (appalling health system) has been more compliant...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

Would people be more willing to follow stricter rules if their healthcare wasn't free at the point of use? Could the fact that the NHS is always just there fore you play a part in causing some complaint behaviours in individuals and in government? 

I don't think it's that...I think a lot of people are just sick of restrictions when they feel like it only affects a small minority...and we have a tory government who's instinct is for state not to intervene in people's lives. 

Edited by steviewevie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

Is there a real risk that NHS will be overwhelmed this time? I guess flu less of a problem this year because of all the social distancing and masks...?

 

Honestly? With the numbers we've been consistently seeing while in the height of winter, rising every day AND Christmas mixing? I think its guaranteed at some hospitals now in the next few weeks. Maybe days. 

We're watching the last days of the NHS. Got a feeling they won't struggle to get the doctors they need when they get paid private amounts. The government certainly won't be complaining at how this is going 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, xxialac said:

South Africa have just announced measures to tackle it:

  • total ban on alcohol sales
  • cancelling of events
  • mandatory wearing of masks in public

 

They banned alcohol in their first lockdown I seem to remember. Never quite sure what the logic behind it is as surely it just encourages dodgy home brewing.

Reports from the NHS looking really grim 😞

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

They banned alcohol in their first lockdown I seem to remember. Never quite sure what the logic behind it is as surely it just encourages dodgy home brewing.

Reports from the NHS looking really grim 😞

I have a colleague in South Africa and she said the townships are obviously much more densely populated and drunkenness leads to less concern about the distance between people.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, gigpusher said:

I have a colleague in South Africa and she said the townships are obviously much more densely populated and drunkenness leads to less concern about the distance between people.  

Yeah but as I say surely leads to dangerous home brewed stuff? I guess less people would drink that though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

If they banned alcohol here then I really would have got upset.

More would die from withdrawal than the virus would kill. Definitely something we need to address as a nation, and I do think alcohol based lifestyles are the main reason for both spread and health outcomes but now is definitely not the time! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

 

It’s because they get away with pumping out their various BS propaganda all year round. Unfortunately for them, with COVID-19, it’s basically a mathematical formula, so it’s harder to deny the reality over a long enough period of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

Yeah but as I say surely leads to dangerous home brewed stuff? I guess less people would drink that though.

Still the hope is probably less people mixing together and home brews take a while to make don't they. Let's be honest a lot of lockdown measures make a lot of people do the wrong thing. I know a lot of people over here think mixing in pubs would probably be safer than people having mates around to their houses but I suppose most countries just hope it puts enough people off to not overwhelm the health service. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...