Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Sziget 2020


jj200

Recommended Posts

I'm curious how much Paul McCartney, Bob Dylan or Bruce Springsteen would ask for a show, compared to Stevie Nicks, if they really want to play the "legends" card. :) I would be more interested in them instead of Fleetwood Mac, to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, #1SzigetFan said:

I'm curious how much Paul McCartney, Bob Dylan or Bruce Springsteen would ask for a show, compared to Stevie Nicks, if they really want to play the "legends" card. :) I would be more interested in them instead of Fleetwood Mac, to be honest.

Dylan 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another idea would be Paul Simon, but he is semi-retired. He was at Outside Lands Festival in the US last year and he donated all the net proceeds from his performance to local environmental non-profit organizations.

Edited by #1SzigetFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, So Sad Simon said:

Stevie Nicks is one of the three in shortlist for last place

I'm going to call BS on this. You seem like a genuine guy who's trying to help us all out but there are a couple of things with your leaks that just don't add up.

1. Selena Gomez seems too 'out there' an option. As previously pointed out, she isn't someone who appears to enjoy playing live and for her to suddenly present herself to tens of thousands of people at a festival thousands of miles away from home just doesn't ring true. Plus, she's not been announced for Bottlerock, Governor's Ball or Bonnaroo.

2. Stevie Nicks - sadly, Sziget has no real history of booking heritage/legend acts. For them to suddenly do so in a kneejerk way also seems very 'out there'. Plus, if they were to suddenly do this then surely Paul McCartney or Springsteen would make more sense.

I hope I'm wrong as I'd love to see Stevie Nicks there. I'm sure you're a sound bloke and I'm confident you're posting in good faith but I really think your friend is winding you up.

No offence meant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, swelsbyuk said:

sadly, Sziget has no real history of booking heritage/legend acts

You're right regarding recent years, but they had Prince in 2011, R.E.M. in 2008, even David Bowie in 1997. :P I think anything can happen at Sziget!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, #1SzigetFan said:

You're right regarding recent years, but they had Prince in 2011, R.E.M. in 2008, even David Bowie in 1997. :P I think anything can happen at Sziget!

Sorry, yes you're right. Even as I typed it I was thinking of Prince so should have stated 'recent history'. I hope I'm wrong, I really do, as I love a heritage act or two!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, I just mentioned Steve Nicks in response to the Governed festival and a mention that 6 will be coming. Personally I think she would be great and would she be so much different to Pink a few years ago or florence?. I take on board that she may be too expensive and there are loads of so called nostalgia acts I would like to see like.

So sad Simon your info sounds more like guess work from your pal than inside info. Tame not coming, is what I said and that just working out the dates from his USA tour. Also i think they will announce something in the next few weeks one way or another as they need to do something soon.

I think we can guess or pick from most of the acts floating about Europe at that time that appeal to the target audience. LG, C Harris, Rapper, Foals,Biffy,tones, Lewis, Mable, disclosure.   I am just wondering if they pull a rabbit out the hat. 

If RHCP they may not do the last day as it was only a few years ago they had a dance act on the last night. 

One thing is for sure they will do what they want and we can all guess all night long . 

 

 

Edited by Davidoff
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davidoff said:

Hi, I just mentioned Steve Nicks in response to the Governed festival and a mention that 6 will be coming. Personally I think she would be great and would she be so much different to Pink a few years ago or florence?

Pink and florence are a world away from Stevie Nick's. Pink and florence are very popular with young fans, which is the festival's main core audience.

Edited by thetime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, #1SzigetFan said:

Billie Eilish announced an Asian tour between the 23rd of August and the 5th of September. I think that now there are less chances to see her at Sziget.

Who are we actually left with as a possibility of headlining?

Ignoring predictions of Selena Gomez, there seems to be a real lack of potential headliners around. Even RHCP are looking unlikely now.

I guess they're going to have to pay big bucks to bring a couple of big names back to Europe, be that Taylor Swift or The Killers or Tame Impala.

If Sziget is also waiting on a 'big' name announcing a tour (as is rumoured), who could that be?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, there was a conference at Eurosonic a few days ago where Tamás Kádár (Sziget CEO) was one of the speakers. He said that August 2020 is really weak in terms of 'big' names and all major festivals in August are struggling to get solid headliners. The line-up is reportedly still not done, especially when it comes to bands at the top of the poster.

I think we'll have to wait a little longer for the announcement (February?) and I'm not really expecting 'amazing line-up'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Newjem said:

Well, there was a conference at Eurosonic a few days ago where Tamás Kádár (Sziget CEO) was one of the speakers. He said that August 2020 is really weak in terms of 'big' names and all major festivals in August are struggling to get solid headliners. The line-up is reportedly still not done, especially when it comes to bands at the top of the poster.

I think we'll have to wait a little longer for the announcement (February?) and I'm not really expecting 'amazing line-up'.

Yeah, I found that on Festileaks. It's pretty readable with Google Translate (they didn't post the article on their English page). In that case we might get a lineup as Reading & Leeds had in 2018 with Fall Out Boy, Kendrick Lamar, Kings of Leon, Travis Scott, Panic! at the Disco & Courteeners as their main acts... R&L announced most of the acts on the 13th of February back then.

Edited by #1SzigetFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, #1SzigetFan said:

I'd really like to read the transcript of that interview but that doesn't appear to be the correct link.

If he's saying that they're struggling to fill the top spots that sounds like they are at least two or three headliners short of a full line-up.

Festivals nowadays live or die by their headliners but how do you solve such a problem? I assume you only have three options:

  1. Give a good, smaller act the opportunity to headline their first festival (ala Dua Lipa in 2018) and use the money saved to strengthen the undercard
  2. Book a headliner that you don't really want but has some recognisability factor (probably loads of options here but I'm thinking of Kings of Leon as prime culprit!)
  3. Throw money at a couple of big, decent headliners and take a financial hit for having not sorted all of this out months ago!

Problem with options 1 and 2 is if you choose these it may affect ticket sales - and they are already affected because of the delay in announcing anything!

 

Edited by swelsbyuk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, swelsbyuk said:

I'd really like to read the transcript of that interview but that doesn't appear to be the correct link.

Yes, sorry!!! This is the correct link. :) Sadly I can't edit my previous comment anymore. It's not exactly a transcript, but it's more like a summary of what they discussed there. The part we are most interested in is this one (translated with Google Translate):

Quote

 

Lesson 6: We have to wait a little longer for the Sziget 2020 line-up

If you look at the 2019 line-up , Sziget seems to have little trouble fishing in world class players. Sziget boss Tamás Kádár also confirms that, but also says directly: before 2020 it will not work out that way. The festival is still a long way off with the program, especially at the top of the poster. According to Tamás, they are not the only ones at Sziget: according to him, August 2020 is not a very fertile period for large touring acts. Again, increased competition is mentioned as an important cause. "We're competing with all the major festivals in Europe, not just our surroundings." And, as he himself says, that competition is almost killing every weekend in August. “If [an artist] has to pick a festival in that time period, they might pick Sziget. "

 

 

Edited by #1SzigetFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, #1SzigetFan said:

Yes, sorry!!! This is the correct link. :) Sadly I can't edit my previous comment anymore. It's not exactly a transcript, but it's more like a summary of what they discussed there. The part we are most interested in is this one (translated with Google Translate):

 

The worrying thing about all this is it appears we are not waiting for a big act to announce a tour. Rather, Sziget is just struggling to book decent headliners. At least they are honest about it. I couldn't imagine Melvin Benn at Reading and Leeds being so candid about their inability to attract the big names.

I'd love to know who is on the shortlist though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is interesting is that other festivals also announce the lineup kind of late... let's take Primavera Sound for example. The festival takes place between the 3rd and 7th of June, but they posted the whole names only few days ago.

Some American festivals also have a similar strategy... Coachella for example is in April, but we knew the lineup officialy only on the 3rd of January.

What I'm trying to say is that Sziget might struggle with the headliners, but might want to apply the above PR strategy too. At the previous edition, after the second announcement (the first being Ed Sheeran only), we already knew 6 out of 7 headliners + most acts. Let's see what happens. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, #1SzigetFan said:

Yes, sorry!!! This is the correct link. :) Sadly I can't edit my previous comment anymore. It's not exactly a transcript, but it's more like a summary of what they discussed there. The part we are most interested in is this one (translated with Google Translate):

 

Thanks for sharing this, its very interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In light of that statement by Sziget staffer I wonder when we will get first announcement now then? 

If I was a betting man I would say we aren't going to hear anything for another month or so. 

If they haven't managed to book seven headliners in the five months since the 2019 festival finished then it's unlikely it's a problem that will be solved in the next few days!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, #1SzigetFan said:

What I'm trying to say is that Sziget might struggle with the headliners, but might want to apply the above PR strategy too.

Don't think that's the case because they are in competition with the other August festivals and the Sziget crowd is not local so their 'customers' might travel somewhere else or in case of BeNeLux or English people just go to their own local August festivals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...