Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Boomtown 2019: Chapter 11


vintagelaureate

Recommended Posts

Well the predicted Facebook grumbling has certainly arrived. A poll was created on the Boomtown Chat Facebook page.

Currently at 396 agaisnt, 152 for. So it would certainly be an uphill battle if they tried to go ahead with it.

And Lak's original post on his Facebook about the matter has attracted over 800 comments already....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it a bit hypocritical to be honest. Boomtown is an event which, despite certain initiatives, is ultimately bad for the planet. 

People travelling all over the country, being entertained by generator power, creating loads of waste - and it’s only people that eat meat that are the problem. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
11 hours ago, stu_kent said:

I find it a bit hypocritical to be honest. Boomtown is an event which, despite certain initiatives, is ultimately bad for the planet. 

that's the case with all ultimately-pointless activities, nothing unique to boomtown.

But despite that all are able to take measures to lessen the impact. I don't think it's hypocrisy for Boomtown to want to lessen their impact.

I'm guessing, but I think boomtown helping push just one person to be a lifetime veggie or vegan would have a hugely bigger effect than (say) using a bit less diesel for power at the festival. It's not only about the difference made only inside the fence of the festival.

I think Boomtown are probably going about this wrongly by being preach-y to a probably-unsuitable audience. They're the ones who book the traders, so they could choose to offer up a much greater proportion of veggie stuff without having to bring in a rule of no-meat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

I think Boomtown are probably going about this wrongly by being preach-y to a probably-unsuitable audience. They're the ones who book the traders, so they could choose to offer up a much greater proportion of veggie stuff without having to bring in a rule of no-meat.

I think this is right. It's an extreme jump, and could come across as preachy.

They already announced around a month ago that for the 2019 festival they are giving priority to vegetarian, vegan and sustainably sourced meat vendors, but not going entirely meat free. That was met with very little controversy, and it's probably the right way to approach the issue for the time being.

I think the idea was always to do this as a gradual process, but Lak sort of let the cat of the bag, perhaps a bit sooner than people were ready for it. Of course, there has been no announcement from the festival officially on the matter, so perhaps putting this out there on unofficial channels, has just been a litmus test to gauge opinion. 

Edited by Sku
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, stu_kent said:

I find it a bit hypocritical to be honest. Boomtown is an event which, despite certain initiatives, is ultimately bad for the planet. 

People travelling all over the country, being entertained by generator power, creating loads of waste - and it’s only people that eat meat that are the problem. 

 

Didn't realise they'd been announced. Definitely up for getting a ticket now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/15/2019 at 9:31 PM, Alex Winstone said:

Any Chance of Beck, Massive Attack and The Prodigy headlining the Town Centre? Can see Frank Carter, The Bronx, Refused, Cancer Bats in the Earache Express. 

Id be shocked at Beck.

Massive attack wouldnt suprise me.

Im going for Prophets of Rage, Aphex Twin & someone not on the radar. Limp Bizkit came from nowhere. Someone like the offspring (Id love that so maybe Im just hoping)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah Beck would be very out there even for their booking strategy but they do like to mix things up so never say never.

Frank Carter anywhere on the bill would be a lot of fun. The other EE bands there seem realistic to me too. 

I get the impression Prodigy wont be around this year though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mr flow said:

For those that were asking previously, SW4's announcement this weekend might have something to do with why a certain act's not playing this year at Boomtown. :ph34r:

No real shock.

Leftfield, The Chemical Brothers & Underworld are all active this summer. I think they'd all fit it well at Boomtown.

Not long to wait now til 8th Feb. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FuzzyDunlop said:

No real shock.

Leftfield, The Chemical Brothers & Underworld are all active this summer. I think they'd all fit it well at Boomtown.

Not long to wait now til 8th Feb. 

Leftfield played a few years ago (2016), and headlined the Town Centre.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a veggie I hope boom town doesn't go meat-free. I don't think its the way to go about changing peoples attitudes because forcing your own views on to someone else just doesn't work. However I think giving vegan and veg priority to certain locations, discounts on the pitches whatever is a good idea as it would promote veganism by more subtle means. AMI can subvert our stomachs  by putting all the meat stalls in weird locations.

Did chase and status get ruled out, I see they're playing SW4?  So many big dance acts (+massive attack) active at the moment the line-up announcement is sure to be big. 

Roll on Chase and Status, Massive Attack, Chemical Brothers and Prophets of Rage. 

Edited by Radi0Head
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, FuzzyDunlop said:

I saw them at a global gathering in the mid / late 2000s and on the west holts at Glastonbury in 2016. They'd go down a storm at BT.

Yeah, they were excellent at Glastonbury in 2016. I managed to catch them twice on that tour and really enjoyed them. Although, i'd say they're more suited to the Town Centre at Boomtown over the Lions Den. As it's just the two of them on stage, they might get a little lost on the Lions Den.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gonna give it another go 

Lions Den: Fatboy Slim, Massive Attack, Chase & Status, Underworld, Chemical Brothers, Pete Tong.

Earache Express: Behemoth, Naplam Death, Death Grips,Marmozets, Shame, Møl, Basement, Milk Teeth, Puppy, Remo Drive, Viagra Boys

Others bands: Run The Jewels, New Order, Public Enemy, Aphex Twin, Bring Me The Horizon, The Specials, The Interrupters, The Skints, Loyale Carner, Young Fathers

Edited by Alex Winstone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Alex Winstone said:

Gonna give it another go 

Lions Den: Fatboy Slim, Massive Attack, Chase & Status, Underworld, Chemical Brothers, Pete Tong.

Earache Express: Behemoth, Naplam Death, Death Grips,Marmozets, Shame, Møl, Basement, Milk Teeth, Puppy, Remo Drive, Viagra Boys

Others bands: Run The Jewels, New Order, Public Enemy, Aphex Twin, Bring Me The Horizon, The Specials, The Interrupters, The Skints, Loyale Carner, Young Fathers

I would literally lose it if Behemoth or Mol played. 

 

The Interrupters would also be sick, but with Slam Dunk, I'm not sure I would see it happening.

Highly expecting Holy Goof present globes to be somewhere at this. Crucast is hot property at the moment, but not sure they will be back after being on Sector 6 last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope fat boy slim is nowhere to be seen at boom. I was bemused when I saw him live and all he played was EDM? His light show was pretty intense though so he has that going for him.

the specials headlined 2 years ago so I don’t think they’d be back just yet.

loyle carner is getting busy again with a tour so this is a good call. He’s fantastic live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...