The state of the ground.

[Franky]

4 minutes ago, Quark said:

They tried to set up camp but Michael Stipe threatened to shank them for being on his patch

lol I would be happy with either tbh but would literally shit myself if The KLF came onstage.

[Quark]

Just now, Franky said:

lol I would be happy with either tbh but would literally shit myself if The KLF came onstage.

If this whole thing is announced as a proper last minute secret set I am going to find you and watch just in case it's the KLF.  I demand proof!

[Sasperella]

21 minutes ago, Franky said:

Thanks you  any sign of the KLF yet ? 

For the state of your health, I kind of hope the big surprise isn't KLF. Lord knows what would happen 

[Quark]

1 minute ago, Sasperella said:

For the state of your health, I kind of hope the big surprise isn't KLF. Lord knows what would happen 

We've already established that. He'll soil himself.

[Sasperella]

4 minutes ago, Quark said:

We've already established that. He'll soil himself.

From my understanding of reading these boards, that isnt actually that uncommon at glastonbury! Expected more somehow. Not sure it's worth being there to witness Quark....unless you plan on having a plate to hand?

[Franky]

6 minutes ago, Quark said:

We've already established that. He'll soil himself.

That was a very long way to get the word "soil" back into this lol 

very good hahahaha

[Franky]

1 minute ago, Sasperella said:

From my understanding of reading these boards, that isnt actually that uncommon at glastonbury! Expected more somehow. Not sure it's worth being there to witness Quark....unless you plan on having a plate to hand?

Meet you at thier ice cream van Sas lol

[Quark]

1 minute ago, Sasperella said:

From my understanding of reading these boards, that isnt actually that uncommon at glastonbury! Expected more somehow. Not sure it's worth being there to witness Quark....unless you plan on having a plate to hand?

I'm curious, not hungry!! :

Something about the use of the word "literal" just drives me to be a pedantic arse!  Most of the time I'm just a pedantic arse for fun  

3 minutes ago, Franky said:

That was a very long way to get the word "soil" back into this lol 

very good hahahaha

[Sasperella]

8 minutes ago, Quark said:

I'm curious, not hungry!! :

Haha i wasnt suggesting you ate it!

I'm half expecting @Franky and his KLF love to show up everywhere now....neatly shoehorned into the Quechua Fresh and Black thread would be pretty impressive

[Franky]

1 minute ago, Sasperella said:

Haha i wasnt suggesting you ate it!

I'm half expecting @Franky and his KLF love to show up everywhere now....neatly shoehorned into the Quechua Fresh and Black thread would be pretty impressive

Representing the KLF on efests since 2005 Sas 

[Sasperella]

38 minutes ago, Franky said:

Representing the KLF on efests since 2005 Sas 

Hahahaha good work...a seamless link indeed. I doubt they even noticed 

[Fork_UK]

I'm banking on that statistically, we can't have two of the wettest years in a row. I'm relying on maths. Maths is real. Maths is FACT. The weather will be good. 

PRAY TO THE WEATHER GODS. 

[Slugworth]

12 minutes ago, Fork_UK said:

I'm banking on that statistically, we can't have two of the wettest years in a row. I'm relying on maths. Maths is real. Maths is FACT. The weather will be good. 

PRAY TO THE WEATHER GODS. 

Maths is real, Gods are not. Which one you going with?

[justperfect]

My god is definitely real

 

 

 

(Pulls pin, throws grenade,walks off casually)

[Untz]

18 minutes ago, Fork_UK said:

I'm banking on that statistically, we can't have two of the wettest years in a row.

Yes we can. Blind hope isn't maths.

[Junglist1981]

It could easily be even wetter this year.

If it wasn't for all the glorious sunshine wot we will be having, of course.

[Johnnyseven]

3 hours ago, Fork_UK said:

I'm banking on that statistically, we can't have two of the wettest years in a row. I'm relying on maths. Maths is real. Maths is FACT. The weather will be good. 

PRAY TO THE WEATHER GODS. 

1997 and 1998 are fact too.

[stuartbert two hats]

3 minutes ago, Johnnyseven said:

1997 and 1998 are fact too.

2010 is fact.

[Johnnyseven]

Just saying that 2 very wet years can and have happened in a row. How many really hot years have we had? That's the only 1 I can think of since I started going in 1998.

Edited May 18, 2017 by Johnnyseven

[Johnnyseven]

I guess it could be time for another then?

Edited May 18, 2017 by Johnnyseven

[Smeble]

4 minutes ago, Johnnyseven said:

Just saying that 2 very wet years can and have happened in a row. How many really hot years have we had? That's the only 1 I can think of since I started going in 1998.

It doesn't need to be hot, just needs to be dry

[waterfalls212434]

13 minutes ago, Smeble said:

It doesn't need to be hot, just needs to be dry

this 10000 times......a bit of a breeze over the site will actually be pretty damn perfect. we just need dry ground,....not to much to ask for....is it?

[stuartbert two hats]

17 minutes ago, Smeble said:

It doesn't need to be hot, just needs to be dry

Or even dryish.  I think the total dryness of 2010 has confused people.  There have been lots of years with great weather.  Off the top of my head, we have

 

1997 - Awful
1998- Awful
1999 - Great!
2000 - Great!
2002 - Don't know
2003 - Great!
2004 - Not good
2005 - Awful! followed by Great!
2007 - Awful
2008 - Good
2009 - Good, if not great
2010 - Great!
2011 - Not good (maybe awful, I wasn't there)
2013 - Again, I wasn't there - this was ok, wasn't it?
2014 - Not good, not awful
2015 - Good, if not great (again wasn't there)
2016 - Awful

And yes, some rain fell on some of the years I said were great.  But on the whole, they were great!

I can no longer read the word 'great'. 

 

[Zoo Music Girl]

1 minute ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Or even dryish.  I think the total dryness of 2010 has confused people.  There have been lots of years with great weather.  Off the top of my head, we have

 

1997 - Awful
1998- Awful
1999 - Great!
2000 - Great!
2002 - Don't know
2003 - Great!
2004 - Not good
2005 - Awful! followed by Great!
2007 - Awful
2008 - Good
2009 - Good, if not great
2010 - Great!
2011 - Not good (maybe awful, I wasn't there)
2013 - Again, I wasn't there - this was ok, wasn't it?
2014 - Not good, not awful
2015 - Good, if not great (again wasn't there)
2016 - Awful

And yes, some rain fell on some of the years I said were great.  But on the whole, they were great!

I can no longer read the word 'great'. 

 

Great!

[Titters]

2002 was Great!