Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2015/16


TheGayTent

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

£10.9m fee agreed between Chelsea and Arsenal for Cech.

 

Have to say, im surprised its that high. He's quality yes but I thought it would be £7-8m tops

I think I read Cech is the same age as VDS when he went to Man utd. Chelsea probably would have sold abroad for 7-8 million, but Arsenal have had to pay a premium to convince them to sell to a side who could potentially compete with them. It looks a good transfer to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I read Cech is the same age as VDS when he went to Man utd. Chelsea probably would have sold abroad for 7-8 million, but Arsenal have had to pay a premium to convince them to sell to a side who could potentially compete with them. It looks a good transfer to me.

Cracking signing, don't see the fee being that extortionate with what there getting. It's someone arsenal have been crying out for years, probably a striker short of realistic challengers. Edited by thetime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cracking signing, don't see the fee being that extortionate with what there getting. It's someone arsenal have been crying out for years, probably a striker short of realistic challengers.

I think they're any good signing short. Giroud/Walcott/Sanchez as strikers have enough firepower IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need that bit of steel, a Vierra type. I also think they need a leader at the back, a commanding CB. Thats it really. Id like to see Arsenal challenge for the title again. Their fans pay so much for their season tickets, they deserve a good title challenge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/33265323

I personally feel that if a player isn't prepared to make themselves available for U21 level then we should be much tougher and tell them they won't have a future in the senior squad. Its all about commitment or the lack of it from our national team players.

Agree,but the idea that England would have easily won the tournament with those players is rubbish. Does lawrenson watch young players outside the premiership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pearson sacked, strange one that.

Wasn't his son involved in that Thai thing and sacked? Maybe he's been telling the board exactly what he thinks about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

could be possible that it has something to do with that, however what annoys me is everyone seems to have taken his side after being sacked even though they know no details as to why it has happened.

 

anyway in more positive news we've sold out for the europa league qualifier thursday, and Lutisans are only bringing 82 away fans, think people are possibly excited for the future, as if Sam Allardyce was still in charge I think it wouldn't have sold out at all...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking more and more certain that LFC are signing Benteke. Villa fans, what are your thoughts on him at the moment? Does he suit a pressing game?

I think he is about as good as Liverpool could get in the domestic market. There are better players abroad, but they are also more of a gamble. When Villa got rid of Lambert he started scoring and Im sure he will do ok given the right supply.

 

 

Wasn't his son involved in that Thai thing and sacked? Maybe he's been telling the board exactly what he thinks about it.

His son was at loan at wrexham last season and wasn't close to the level to be at a premiership club! Pearson has had a few incidents and I imagine in a corporate premiership world his face may not fit. He did a decent job keeping Leicester up, but I suspect he wont get another premiership job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Looking more and more certain that LFC are signing Benteke. Villa fans, what are your thoughts on him at the moment? Does he suit a pressing game?

A very decent player, but defo not one for the pressing game. Will be a dreadful waste of money I reckon.

I'm starting to think that Origi will be the man, cos while he has his skill issues his pace with those two Brazilian's behind could have a surprising impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

So Citeh have signed Sterling etc etc.

Have they?

The spending so far doesn't need Sterling sold, I don't think. They'll offload a few and get a few quid back, plus the £50M-ish that Fenway seem happy to invest each season.

Of course, that's dependent on Fenway actually being willing to invest a chunk each season, but I wouldn't be surprised. The rise of players such as Sterling is *exactly* their game-plan, and their game-plan doesn't work if they don't keep the improving players.

(they can't keep Sterling forever of course, but they ideally need to get greater benefit from him before he's off).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyway in more positive news we've sold out for the europa league qualifier thursday, and Lutisans are only bringing 82 away fans, think people are possibly excited for the future, as if Sam Allardyce was still in charge I think it wouldn't have sold out at all...

35,000 in early July to watch Westley play the youth team against some pub team?

Mad or stupid...probably both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...