Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2016


thewayiam

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 15.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 minute ago, JoBalls said:

News of the Coldplay petition is in the papers today.

I'm tempted to start a petition calling for this "Felicity Martin" to return her ticket and stop moaning at the Eavii...

You do understand that petition is satire, don't you? It's word for word the same petition as there was for Kanye last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, theouterlimits said:

You do understand that petition is satire, don't you? It's word for word the same petition as there was for Kanye last year.

No I did not know that, I didn't read the Kanye petition last year, and the media haven't picked up on it being satire either. 

Satire or not, I'd be a bit miffed at the media coverage it's caused if I was Emily or Michael.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JoBalls said:

No I did not know that, I didn't read the Kanye petition last year, and the media haven't picked up on it being satire either. 

Satire or not, I'd be a bit miffed at the media coverage it's caused if I was Emily or Michael.

It's all part of the build up these days. It should have a place on The Thingy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe that Coldplay petition has got this much attention. It was so obviously a joke, how come hardly anyone has noticed?

Maybe cos people seem to find it easier to go along with outrage about the modern world rather than actually read the source.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bradders said:

I can't believe that Coldplay petition has got this much attention. It was so obviously a joke, how come hardly anyone has noticed?

Maybe cos people seem to find it easier to go along with outrage about the modern world rather than actually read the source.

Nah.  Because there are knobheads everywhere starting ridiculous petitions, so nothing seemed out of the ordinary about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bradders said:

I can't believe that Coldplay petition has got this much attention. It was so obviously a joke, how come hardly anyone has noticed?

Maybe cos people seem to find it easier to go along with outrage about the modern world rather than actually read the source.

The problem with the internet/social media is that it's very difficult to convey that you're joking/being sarcastic in writing... Especially when writing for people who don't know you. 

She should have added a :D to the petition to make it obvious that it was just for lols.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, JoBalls said:

The problem with the internet/social media is that it's very difficult to convey that you're joking/being sarcastic in writing... Especially when writing for people who don't know you. 

She should have added a :D to the petition to make it obvious that it was just for lols.

But if people have found the time to get angry about the Kanye petition and now this one, they could also find the time to actually read the petitions. If they had it'd be blatantly obvious it was a parody without having to put "lol j/k" at the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair sensible people would not even read a petition to get an artist removed from a festival. If a sensible person was that unhappy about a line up surely they would just not go?

I personally think Coldplay for the 4th time is a bit of a poor booking. I do appreciate though that it will make a lot of people happy so fair play as it makes me happy seeing other people happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/16/2016 at 11:48 AM, russycarps said:

The pyramid stage is the best place to watch a headliner for most people. That's why they are upset when one of the coveted slots has been taken by a band that are complete droppings.

 

I've got a friend who recently told me his three favourite acts live were Flaming Lips, Leonard Cohen and Bruce Springsteen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, A Guy Called Matt said:

In an ideal world, given we have Coldplay on Sunday, who would people now choose to headline the Pyramid the other two nights?

My choice would be

AC/DC - who I would watch

Adele or Radiohead - who I would not watch

That, for me, gives a good and varied set of headliners.

In an ideal world, Aphex Twin and RDF. 

Edited by fatyeti24
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Vanderlyle said:

I've got a friend who recently told me his three favourite acts live were Flaming Lips, Leonard Cohen and Bruce Springsteen.

Well that's a pretty eclectic mix I have to say!

They just need to get rid of springsteen and bring nick cave into the mix for a flawless trio.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...