Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2016


thewayiam

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, ericlered said:

Good info, thanks. This means New Order headlined a few months before they even put out their debut album. They only played 8 songs as well. Surely they can't have been headlining?

Edit: Think they played before Hawkwind, blimey.

Hawkwind were the headliners on the Friday night. New Order were still very much akin to Joy Division but didn't look very comfortable on stage as they were faced with thousands of die hard Hawkfans like myself. Dave Brock was very unimpressed with them. The crowd started to get angry when Hawkwind's set was cut short because of the curfew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi, new here so please don't hate! Just wondering if there is actually any credibility behind the radiohead rumours? I personally don't mind muse or coldplay but given this will be my 8th glasto I just feel it's a bit samey booking two bands that have both headlined in the past 6 years. At least with Adele they'd be mixing things up a bit, not a big fan of her music but I'd be intrigued 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SwedgeAntilles said:

Don't get Biffy Clyro at all. Not even in a "ach they're Scottish so I should at least pretend to like them" way. Nah. Not for me. 

Not sure if its my age or owt but I couldn't name a single song by them/him. I am familiar with the name but thats about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, chown95 said:

Hi, new here so please don't hate! Just wondering if there is actually any credibility behind the radiohead rumours? I personally don't mind muse or coldplay but given this will be my 8th glasto I just feel it's a bit samey booking two bands that have both headlined in the past 6 years. At least with Adele they'd be mixing things up a bit, not a big fan of her music but I'd be intrigued 

Neil (guy who runs this site) has had info that they're playing (playing - not neccasserily headlining) and their tour dates line up nicely; but there's been more stuff pointing to it being Muse so who knows? Sure do hope it's Radiohead though. Would make my festival 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, chown95 said:

Hi, new here so please don't hate! Just wondering if there is actually any credibility behind the radiohead rumours? I personally don't mind muse or coldplay but given this will be my 8th glasto I just feel it's a bit samey booking two bands that have both headlined in the past 6 years. At least with Adele they'd be mixing things up a bit, not a big fan of her music but I'd be intrigued 

No hate here :) Yes, there is some credible evidence, it was supplied by the same anonymous tipster that told Neil (the site admin, posts as 'efestivals') that Radiohead were playing The Park in 2010. 

Unfortunately, there is lots of noise about Muse and Adele playing and despite a very strange tip that Muse would be playing a non-secret, non-headlining slot it seems to be looking increasingly unlikely that it's Radiohead. Still, you would expect them to play at least one UK festival and there is still a suitable gap in their schedule, so who knows? I certainly hope they will play.

Welcome to the forum, come over to the Radiohead thread and post a list!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, H.M.V said:

Not sure if its my age or owt but I couldn't name a single song by them/him. I am familiar with the name but thats about it. 

Same. I know I've heard their stuff on the radio or whatever but nothing makes a lasting impact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Neil (guy who runs this site) has had info that they're playing (playing - not neccasserily headlining) and their tour dates line up nicely; but there's been more stuff pointing to it being Muse so who knows? Sure do hope it's Radiohead though. Would make my festival 

Ah cheers, I agree they'd be a brilliant addition to the lineup! 

5 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

No hate here :) Yes, there is some credible evidence, it was supplied by the same anonymous tipster that told Neil (the site admin, posts as 'efestivals') that Radiohead were playing The Park in 2010. 

Unfortunately, there is lots of noise about Muse and Adele playing and despite a very strange tip that Muse would be playing a non-secret, non-headlining slot it seems to be looking increasingly unlikely that it's Radiohead. Still, you would expect them to play at least one UK festival and there is still a suitable gap in their schedule, so who knows? I certainly hope they will play.

Welcome to the forum, come over to the Radiohead thread and post a list!

Thanks, you've made me feel extremely welcome :) I have to admit Muse playing a non-headlining slot seems very strange, not only because they are a headliner sized band but I can't imagine them playing in daylight. Part of what makes Muse so good live is the extravagant light show they put on, I really can't see them playing an earlier slot but who knows! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biffy are always a weird one on festival bills, i didn't go but their reading set looked incredible. they've said their new stuff will be a return to their roots, which is weirder and less accessible, so i'm assuming by next year we'll be able to have them as a sub easily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ace56blaa said:

Biffy are always a weird one on festival bills, i didn't go but their reading set looked incredible. they've said their new stuff will be a return to their roots, which is weirder and less accessible, so i'm assuming by next year we'll be able to have them as a sub easily.

I think it's definitely safe to say that come the next album after this new one they'll be back as subs/lower than headliners on most festival bills, which is no bad thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, SwedgeAntilles said:

Don't get Biffy Clyro at all. Not even in a "ach they're Scottish so I should at least pretend to like them" way. Nah. Not for me. 

Seen them once. Glastonbury 11.

I'd watched BB King, and wanted to watch Moz. I could either leave or stay where I was and watch Biffy. After 5/6 songs all I thought was "why didn't I go back to the tent to pick some shit up?"

They were shite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, FuzzyDunlop said:

Seen them once. Glastonbury 11.

I'd watched BB King, and wanted to watch Moz. I could either leave or stay where I was and watch Biffy. After 5/6 songs all I thought was "why didn't I go back to the tent to pick some shit up?"

They were shite.

Drugs > the Clyro

Just as I suspected 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GETOFFAMYLAWN said:

Shed Seven is the weirdest band name ever. Did they all used to hang out in a fucking shed or something? Just odd.

This will make me look like the Shed Seven fanboy I was as a young teenager. They first rehearsed in shed number seven of some former railway sheds in York and took their name from it, if I remember correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, jimmyt said:

This will make me look like the Shed Seven fanboy I was as a young teenager. They first rehearsed in shed number seven of some former railway sheds in York and took their name from it, if I remember correctly.

Well, I suppose that's acceptable. I thought there was no way you'd fit a band of 7 in a normal garden shed, but a railway shed, I suppose it makes sense. They're off the hook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Purple aki squat said:

Shed seven?

Headliners thread?

You ok friend?

Made a change from talking about Coldplay and Stone Roses :D

Whilst people bang on about Blur and Oasis, I think Shed Seven were a much better representation of what it felt like to be living though that whole mid-90's brit pop thing.  You can keep your "girls and boys" and your "champagne supernovas", "Getting Better" was the attitude.  Then the millennium arrived and it all went to shit.   I'd go as far to say Maximum High was (in retrospect) a better album for summing up that period than A Great Escape and (Whats the Story) Morning Glory.

So... Parallel Lines to close Sunday on the Pyramid please :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
9 hours ago, theevilfridge said:

Biffy would've been a great headline booking. I think it's very sad that Coldplay and (probably) Muse were given the call again when such a deserving band were in the perfect place to do it.

word I heard is that Glastonbury don't see them as headliners, tho I can't verify that's true.

And if Biffy are co-headining Reading/Leeds this year as I've been told they are, then I think it's fair to say that Glastonbury have a fair point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...