Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2016


thewayiam

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, stuartbert two hats said:

That song delayed my LCD Soundsystem appreciation by several years.  I listen to it and think I'd rather have Daft Punk.  Then I discover the joy of 45:33 and Freak Out/Starry Eyes a few months ago and get it.

Actually I saw them live in 2010 and thought they were brilliant, but still didn't manage to get into their recorded output for some unfathomable reason.

Losing My Edge is my favourite by them! One of only two times in my life I've asked a dj in a club who he's playing. The other being Peaches Fuck the Pain Away. Loved em instantly. Still do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 hour ago, ghostdancer1 said:

same experience with Daft Punk is playing..., disliked it when I heard it, instinctively wasn't interested in LCD Soundsystem for a few years until after Sound of Silver came out.

that and Losing My Edge are 2 of their worst songs for me.

Drunk Girls being by far the worst.

Lyrically all of those are ace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

Losing My Edge is my favourite by them! One of only two times in my life I've asked a dj in a club who he's playing. The other being Peaches Fuck the Pain Away. Loved em instantly. Still do.

SUCKIN' ON MA TITTIES LIKE YOU WANTED ME CALLIN' ME

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DJ Cull said:

Now that Beck is confirmed for Fold festival on the Saturday does that in read his chances of being at Glasto this year? He's always good to see live

He was around last year over Glastonbury but didn't play. Whether that increases chances this year I'm not sure. I've seen him in London the last 3 summers so not as fussed about seeing him anymore, slight overkill for me! But always good so would see again if no clashes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SwedgeAntilles said:

Polly confirmed, New Order TBC, Chvrches and Foals SR based on decent info? 

This pleases me. 

Just need those Radiohead, TLSP and LCD SRs to come to fruition and I'll be a happy camper. 

Tlsp basically self confirmed in an interview

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
Just now, Brave Sir Robin said:

Subbing who, eh?

well, when peeps started posting about them having been changed, I was sure that I'd told Scott to put them on Sunday as subbing Coldplay, but then I hunted down what had been said to me for that update and discovered there was nothing about days.

So now i'm not sure if I invented that Coldplay bit out of nothing, or it's because of something else that was said to me. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Andy0808 v5 said:

Foals into Coldplay would be odd, although a much better option than Ellie Goulding. 

I know this is the second time today I've pushed this theory but is there a chance that because of the (apparent) competition for places this year someone like Ellie G could find themselves 3rd down the bill? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...