Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

Funnily enough, last night I found myself in an indie nightclub, against my better judgement. It was in here that I encountered Becky from Oldham, who told me that Reni was her brother's dog's mate's local butcher's uncle's next door neighbour or something shit like that, and it was through this close relationship she had with Reni, that she knew The Stone Roses would be the final Glastonbury headliner. Take this info with a pinch of salt, because Becky from Oldham struck me as something of a moron.

I work in Oldham so I feel your for the encounter you suffered last night.

Were you out in Oldham or in town?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

This is from the stone roses forum

"Stone Roses Fans Page on FB, lad on there bumped into Reni and his wife yesterday, photos to prove it. Reni's response to being asked if the album was happening was 'That's the million dollar question', accompanied by a "cheeky smile"

Requested to join the page to see for myself, but yet again more rumours bubbling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Roses have had the tunes since they got back together, ive heard them all promise it was coming the year after and it never has.

From what I've heard, they simply don't get on and don't want to tour with each other for the time being. They are unpredictable, but THIS unpredictable? I'm not so sure...of course my source could be wrong and I'll post whenever he says something different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Roses have had the tunes since they got back together, ive heard them all promise it was coming the year after and it never has.

From what I've heard, they simply don't get on and don't want to tour with each other for the time being. They are unpredictable, but THIS unpredictable? I'm not so sure...of course my source could be wrong and I'll post whenever he says something different.

For a moment I thought you said you'd heard all the new songs, I was like what!! But yea they have all promised this year, and there was that rumour a couple of years back that they had split but a spokesperson said "no comment" and that was it. I have complete faith they will have a new album, I don't think they would allow to reunite for the money and then just split up. It was never about that for the. Keep on keeping on with that faith!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funnily enough, last night I found myself in an indie nightclub, against my better judgement. It was in here that I encountered Becky from Oldham, who told me that Reni was her brother's dog's mate's local butcher's uncle's next door neighbour or something shit like that, and it was through this close relationship she had with Reni, that she knew The Stone Roses would be the final Glastonbury headliner. Take this info with a pinch of salt, because Becky from Oldham struck me as something of a moron.

Haha. Which indie club was that then? Manc yeh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure I must know Mani as well, since everybody else has some connection to him it seems

We all know at least one member as best mates, and you may not remember but everyone went to spike island too.

Edited by FrancisH
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno... charlatans tweeted saying '<3 glastonbury' then quickly removed it and are now denying it (surprise surprise)... To me at least it seems like they're clearly playing and have been told to play ignorant about it, and I wouldn't be surprised if most acts just did that as a default answer.

yeah, it's pretty unlikely that Charlatans don't know yet if they're playing.

my friend's band played the Acoustic stage in 2013 and knew in January that they were playing, and the general time they'd be on shortly after.

for well-known bands who are touring, they'd all know at this stage what general time they're on, let alone if they're playing, as many would have travel and logistics for getting to other festivals/countries that would have to be booked months ago.

maybe a DJ in The Rum Shack or somewhere mightn't be 100% yet, but a band the size of The Charlatans would definitely know if they're playing with less than 3 months to go for an appearance in the middle of festival season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's possible they know they are playing but not where or when yet. I know a band who are playing this year and have been moved around a few potential stages and (I think) still not completely finalised their position

Is it the stone roses presumably?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's possible they know they are playing but not where or when yet. I know a band who are playing this year and have been moved around a few potential stages and (I think) still not completely finalised their position

I'm guessing that's Public Service Broadcasting going by your post last night?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glastonbury shifts acts around all the time. Didn't Lily Allen self confirm for the sunday and then she was actually playing the friday?

I'd imagine that unless that's the only days they can do, acts are pencilled in and told you'l be playing here unless something changes or we offer you a different day.

Edited by Matt42
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is no one mentioning the fact that the only remaining possible headliners on the rumours page is Florence and P***** due to not wanting to jinx it? If Emily's denied Florence isn't He the only one left who's likely to do it?! Unless it's just a let down that no one knows about of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is no one mentioning the fact that the only remaining possible headliners on the rumours page is Florence and P***** due to not wanting to jinx it? If Emily's denied Florence isn't He the only one left who's likely to do it?! Unless it's just a let down that no one knows about of course.

I see it like this.

Florence - Possibly filling in.

Stone Roses - Name being thrown around but no evidence they are active.

Madonna - Name being thrown around.

Prince - Name being thrown around.

Someone we haven't thought of yet.

If I was a betting man, I'd say that the reason the third headliner hasn't been announced already, is because who ever it doesn't want it announced yet. A Prince, Stone Roses, one we haven't thought of yet seems to make the most sense.

Fuck knows though :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see it like this.

Florence - Possibly filling in.

Stone Roses - Name being thrown around but no evidence they are active.

Madonna - Name being thrown around.

Prince - Name being thrown around.

Someone we haven't thought of yet.

If I was a betting man, I'd say that the reason the third headliner hasn't been announced already, is because who ever it doesn't want it announced yet. A Prince, Stone Roses, one we haven't thought of yet seems to make the most sense.

Fuck knows though :)

Florence - No chance

Stone Roses - No chance.

Madonna - No chance.

Prince - I would like this but No chance.

Someone we haven't thought of yet - Most have been mentioned at least once but I think whoever it is comes under this heading

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prince or Taylor Swift for me! Would have loved The Who if they weren't busy that day. I think Florence is unlikely but may be there somewhere, and would definitely be elsewhere for the Stone Roses in the very unlikely chance it is them. Bored me to death at Isle of Wight the other year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...